Fair play to broadcaster Alan Corcoran and South East Radio for allowing this important discussion and to Dr Billy Ralph for holding his ground despite being vilified by the Medical Council for rightfully opposing the draconian measures of the Covid era.

On August 10, 2026, the Wexford GP was found guilty of professional misconduct over posts on social media during the Covid scam which were highly critical of public health measures. The reality is the Medical Council are guilty of professional misconduct but in this upside down world of projection and deflection, this is what we’ve got.

Dr Ralph’s interview with South East radio marks a breakthrough moment on Irish airwaves as listeners have been robbed from hearing the other side of the story since 2020, kept in the dark, ignorant of the facts, brainwashed by the constant repetitive messaging of the highly lucrative propaganda machine.

Discussing the excess deaths on air shows beyond doubt that there was no pandemic, just dangerous medical protocols combined with international lockstep policies enforced with an iron fist. No disagreement allowed.

Once the excess deaths since 2021 are acknowledged, it gives Irish people an opportunity to discuss the increase in cancers, clots, heart issues and neurological problems (to name but a few) since the rollout of what was sold as ‘safe and effective vaccines’. Talking about the excess deaths since the injections interrupts the gaslighting the Irish (and the world) have enduring while attempting to broach the subject.

We need to talk about the excess deaths as a matter of fact, just like Dr Billy Ralph on South East Radio. We may disagree on some of the details of the overall interview like whether or not there was a dangerous virus called ‘Covid’ that warranted Ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine but clearly Dr Ralph had patients presenting with ailments that required attention, just like Dr Pat Morrissey of Adare. That much we can agree on. With excess deaths we’re on more firmer ground. You’re either dead or you’re not. It’s easier to quantify. No questionable testing kit involved.

Here’s a reminder of the Eurostat Excess Mortality data for Ireland 2020-2025. Clearly we have a big problem and it’s not being discussed in the Irish mainstream media who are guilty of coercing their audience into entering a dangerous medical trial under false pretences. There was no medical emergency in 2020. No reason to lock down the country. No reason to introduce mRNA gene therapy shots as a solution. Covid was a scam to create more revenue for Big Pharma and fuel the depopulation agenda espoused by Bill Gates and his billionaire buddies.

On hearing Dr Billy Ralph on radio his colleague Dr Marcus De Brun, who was also found guilty of misconduct for doing the right thing, tweeted:

Dr Mick McConville who has also been hauled before the Medical Council for his tweets exposing the Covid scam tweeted:

Once the Irish public figures out that the doctors they were encouraged to hate were the ones who stood up and sacrificed their reputations to protect their patients, perhaps things will change. Perhaps not.

Best we can do in the meantime is remind them, remind them, remind them.

You can find Dr Billy Ralph’s full interview on South East Radio HERE.

Independent journalist Louise Roseingrave has been following the story:

Louise Roseingrave

Broadcast to the Nation: Dr Billy Ralph's radio interview Breakthrough

Dr Billy Ralph’s radio interview is spreading across the country today and it’s causing quite a stir. Broadcast this morning at 10am, South East Radio gave 23 minutes to the topic of the Irish Medical Council’s judgement of ‘professional misconduct’ against the Wexford GP…

Read more

3 days ago · 39 likes · 26 comments · Louise Roseingrave

Related articles:

Ireland's dissident doctors show up to support Dr Pat Morrissey at his fitness-to-practise hearing

Ireland’s persecuted doctors show up to support Dr Mick McConville for his fitness-to-practise hearing in Dublin

Nineteen years of age keeps coming up. Delingpole was apparently 19 when he fancied the Belgian boy in Africa. He was also 19 when he was seduced by a ‘cougar’ in Greece and 19 when he lost his virginity in Venice on a spring holiday during his second year in Oxford.

Miri was 19 when she read his Thinly Disguised Autobiography which she apparently promptly forgot despite singing its praises in July 2023 along with friendly reminders of its contents from March 2025 onwards.

You can be forgiven for a lot when you’re 19. You’re still a big kid. Not quite an adult. You haven’t formed any strong opinions on much. You’re still figuring out how to negotiate this big, bad world.

I’m prompted to return to this divisive Mirigate story again thanks to a comment from long time reader, Catherine Franklin, whose opinion I respect.

So here we go again. Round three. Ding ding.

Please note these exchanges are useful and help us understand the terrain we find ourselves in as blistering as the comments section can become. These interactions inform us and encourage greater accountability, research and clarity.

Catherine is well within her rights to query my motivations in pointing out Miri Finch’s double standards when it comes to Rod Liddle and James Delinpole’s pedo apologist agendas. It’s up to me to show her where I’m coming from. No hysterics necessary. Run of the mill journalism.

So here’s Delingpole on August 20, 2013 reiterating the Belgian boy tale from Africa in the Telegraph.

Article reads:

It would be impertinent of me – and also dishonest – to look back on romantic trysts past and wish I’d ended up with anyone other than my wife. I love Tiffany and I love our children.

But let me tell you instead about a much, much more interesting instance of love at first sight. You could call it my ‘Tadzio from Death in Venice’ moment because my inamorata was, in fact, a beautiful blond youth.

I was 19 at the time, just out of school, still a virgin and, I suppose, mildly uncertain about my sexuality. It happened at a border crossing between Sudan and the Central African Republic.

Waiting interminably with my fellow overlanders to have our passports stamped by the inevitable corrupt customs officers, I spied across the other side of the grass hut one of the most exquisite creatures I have ever seen. Our eyes met and I was smitten.

I thought it was a girl at first, though I couldn’t be totally sure.

She – or was it a he? – was travelling with a man old enough to be its father. God knows what their relationship was but they weren’t family. We got chatting. They were Belgian and I was the only one in our group who spoke reasonably fluent French.

Discovering that the pretty thing was male, I felt surprised and mildly guilty to realise that it didn’t stop me fancying him.

There was an electricity between us. The older man – ruined, malarial – could see this and glowered jealously. It made me despise the older man and wish I could rescue my Tadzio from his sordid clutches. Lust didn’t come into it. (Well, not much.)

It was pure, romantic, all-consuming. As day turned to night (clearly, our border bribe hadn’t been enough), I began fantasising about our escape. My ephebe and I would run off and end up God knew where but it wouldn’t matter – the point was we would be together forever.

Anyway, we didn’t. But imagine how wonderfully, fascinatingly different it would have been if we had! No school fees, no family responsibilities. I could have been bigger than Stephen Fry.

Back to the comments section of my last Substack entitled Breakthrough! Miri AF finally admits the pedo parts in James Delingpole’s book are ‘weird and inappropriate’ and strangely enough, her associate Francis O’Neill is still making excuses for Delingpole’s ‘satire’.

Seems like Francis is going to need as much work as Miri to get an appropriate response about Delingpole’s creepy side. I’ll keep working on it, thank you.

So according to Francis O’Neill’s logic if Delingpole puts it out there in a British newspaper of record for public consumption it’s no biggie. Looks like Francis is missing the point, on purpose. Again.

Surely he knows that putting this stuff out in the newspapers is part of a larger agenda to normalise pedo behaviour using a softly softly approach. I was 19 excuse. It’s not accidental. Surely he’s just read Miri’s article on Rod Liddle. Well apply it to Delingpole. This is not hard.

Delingpole references Tadzio from Death in Venice in his Telegraph article. Who’s Tadzio?

Tadzio is a fictional 14-year-old Polish boy in Thomas Mann's 1912 novella Death in Venice. He becomes the object of a fatal, silent obsession for an aging German writer named Gustav von Aschenbach.

Ew!

Are you still with me, Catherine?

There’s more to come. Sick bags at the ready. Sticking with Venice, in his Thinly Disguised Autobiography Delingpole gives us the excruciating details involved in losing his virginity, something he wanted rid of fast, being 19 and all. Don’t ask Miri about this chapter, she’s more than likely forgotten this bit too.

The lucky recipient is a student (legal age!) known as ‘Camille/Simone/Whoever, let’s stick to Camille, shall we?’ writes Delingpole in a chapter entitled The Comfort of Strangers, a nod to Ian McEwan’s novel most likely based in Venice.

‘Not only is she clever enough to be sitting her Oxbridge exams herself later this year, but also she has a brother at Magdalen. He’s in a the year above me, he’s grand and madly social enough to have been elected a member of the Buller (code for Bullingdon Club) and she’s been to stay with him loads of times…’

Sounds like Delingpole was more excited about the prospect of the Buller brother than poor Camille but he uses her to unshackle himself from the burden of virginity. In the same room is Delingpole’s brother Dick also losing his virginity. Delingpole considers it a race.

He wrote it, not me! There’s no point getting angry with me about these things put out into the public domain for all to read. It’s not my fault for noticing these things.

Shall we go on? Deep breaths. Let’s proceed.

From Africa to Venice and now to Greece - 19 year old James Delingpole sure does get around. In this article in The Telegraph from September 29, 2009, Delingpole again blurs the lines with a softly, softly approach. His ‘cougar’ is 36. He’s 19. A 17 year age gap. What’s the problem? Well there is no real issue between consenting adults but you’d have to wonder about the agenda behind such a headline, hints that the ‘prey’ enjoys it, asks for it, begs for it, learns from it, wants the attention. That creepy agenda again.

Article reads:

“Would you mind awfully if I seduced you?” asked the attractive older woman sitting next to me on the bus, placing one hand meaningfully on my bare, suntanned thigh.

“Er, no,” I replied.

And I didn’t. Not one bit. I was 19; she – it later transpired – was 36, a lecturer at London University. And if there’s one thing you want above all else when you’re 19, it’s uncomplicated, deliciously meaningless sex with a good-looking woman who is totally up for it, knows what she’s doing, and isn’t secretly wishing that you were a bit older and more experienced because that’s not what she’s after. What she wants is your youth.

The woman – I’ve forgotten her name, unfortunately, but then we didn’t waste too much time exchanging CVs – was what I suppose would now be called a “Cougar”. These are the Mrs Robinson types, celebrated in the new Courteney Cox sitcom Cougar Town, who like to prey on the tender flesh of young men half their age.

When you put it like that it does sound slightly vampiric, and I gather that some feminists are up in arms at this “ridiculous and belittling” depiction of the single older woman and female sexuality, which, so they say, owes more to stereotypical male fantasy than reality.

Well they’ve got the “male fantasy” bit right. Until it happens to you, you imagine it’s the sort of thing that only happens in “readers’ true experiences” pages in girlie mags. That’s why, as the seduction progressed, I kept having to pinch myself to be sure I wasn’t dreaming.

It was the summer of my first year at university, and I’d gone to the Greek island of Spetses because I liked John Fowles’s The Magus. There, on a beach, I positioned myself reasonably close to some nice-looking women who turned out to be a bit older than I thought. We got talking; we had an Ouzo or three; we took the bus back into town; and that’s when I received my kind offer.

There’s this great myth among adolescents that older women teach you all sorts of amazing sexual tricks. This isn’t really true – or at least it’s certainly not the most important thing they teach you. What I really learned from this magical, brilliant woman – thank you, whoever you are! – is that sex is something you can enjoy without hang-ups.

Too often in your early sexual years as a man, you’re made to feel as if sex is something you can only really get through trickery (either guile or more usually alcohol), that you’re a bit rubbish at it, and that you’re frankly rather squalid for having insisted on it so soon in the relationship. Older women have no truck with these games. They are as grateful for your efforts as you are for their instruction. It is the perfect symbiotic relationship.

That’s why I’m always deeply puzzled when a female teacher gets had up – and sometimes even put away – for having sex with one of her boy pupils. How can that possibly be right? First, it’s physically impossible for a woman to rape a man: if he’s capable, then he’s interested. Second, at least one – and preferably several – sexual encounters with an older woman is what every heterosexual male needs to make him better in bed and happier in his skin.

Is this not Rod Liddle enough for you, Catherine? Delingpole is excusing female teachers acting in a predatory fashion towards their students because the ‘prey’ should be thrilled to have an opportunity to learn from an older woman. Nothing about the wonky power differential or taking advantage of a minor.

Isn’t it funny how somebody as well researched as Francis O’Neill can play dumb to these articles which take all of two seconds to find on the Internet.

I can’t seem to get a direct response from Francis O’Neill on these simple questions. Mr ‘Just Asking Questions’ has a happy knack of dodging them when directed his way about somebody he’s been making excuses for because of the platform afforded to himself, Miri and Leo Biddle.

I also pointed Francis in the direction of this article which boils down to a piece about sex tourism in Ghana. Here’s the full thing in case it disappears off the Internet.

Article ends.

In other words this is a sex tourism article explaining where you can find disadvantaged young ones to use while making out they’re begging for it so what’s the problem? Unless you believe that poor ole Delingpole was dragged kicking and screaming to the brothel just because he happened to bump into some nameless strangers on the plane. No, there’s another agenda behind articles like these. If I was dispatched to Ghana to write a travel piece, you’re not going to find out where the hot spots are for prostitution. It’s probably why they don’t send me.

It’s not clear what age Delingpole was for his adventure in Ghana. He’ll probably tell you 19.

Anyway there’s a clear pattern emerging from these pieces that can’t be ignored try as some might, even if Delingpole was a shining light during the Covid scam and he was. Sadly that’s not enough. It turns out the truther scene is riddled with competing agendas that involve gaining trust from people considered conspiracy theorists or just those with working critical faculties.

That’s why these bust-ups are useful. Messy but useful.

They help us question those who’ve appointed themselves the arbiters of truth and justice. We get to see how they respond to basic questions. We get to see them playing dumb. We get to see them projecting and spitting the dummy.

It’s intriguingly revealing.

Related articles:

Breakthrough! Miri AF finally admits the pedo parts in James Delingpole’s book are ‘weird and inappropriate’

Blind spot or turning a blind eye? Miri AF and the Delingpole problem

The admission didn’t come easy. It’s fair to say it was forced but at least Miri AF squeezed out the words ‘weird and inappropriate’ after a two-day online battle where she feigned shock and horror at being called out for double standards, firing machine gun rate insults to ward off taking personal responsibility.

Rod Liddle bad. Delingpole? Look the other way.

Some of us could see the hypocrisy straight off. The old schoolers. Others not so much. What’s the problem? Who cares if Miri ignores Delingpole’s book, the one she can’t remember, but focuses on Rod Liddle’s old articles about fancying minors? Who cares if she refuses to acknowledge Delingpole’s pedo parts despite singing the book’s praises in July 2023 before appearing at least three times on his podcast?

Well, on an ethical basis, it becomes problematic when one takes the moral high ground writing about these matters, as Miri has in her Substack Psychos, schizos and Rod Liddle. The discerning reader can’t help but notice the omission. It becomes a Delingpole shaped elephant in between the sentences.

Why does Delinpgole get special treatment? Is it because he offers Miri and friends a platform and a larger audience than they’re used to? Is there something else we should know about? A deal of some kind, maybe. It’s distracting, in other words. Thoughts start to stray.

That’s why it’s much better to be clear these things up as they arise, like in March 2025 when I first brought this issue to the table. Imagine if Miri had simply said, ‘Yeah those passages are a bit creepy and inappropriate alright. I must have completely overlooked those parts when reading the book when I was 19. I’ll put it to James in our next podcast’. We could have skipped all this scrapping and nastiness. Instead she chose to ignore the Delingpole elephant and allowed the tension to build. Why won’t Miri acknowledge the passages? I kept thinking. She’d clearly seen them. From time to time, I’d remind her in a respectful manner, to no avail.

An updated response after such glowing praise for the creepy book would have been the right thing to do. Ignoring the pedo parts was the wrong thing to do. At least if ethics applied. This is really basic. Ignoring the pedo parts of Delingpole’s book then focusing on Rod Liddle’s minor attraction excerpts only brings into sharp focus the special treatment that Delingpole’s was getting for whatever reason.

Clearly Miri did not like being held to account. In fact, she flipped. She tried every trick in the book to dodge taking responsibility for her own words and actions. It wasn’t pretty. We got to see the vicious tactics deployed to sidestep this basic ethical issue, one that she had created herself through her own choices. Miri was merciless while attempting to look the victim. Thankfully more and more of us are getting good at recognising this behaviour for what it is: deflection, projection, hysterics. The lady doth protest too much methinks.

Strangely Miri displayed all the traits of the psycho she had written about in her article about Rod Liddle, without any hint of irony. This fact seems to upset her greatly when pointed out. It should. It was like holding a mirror up to her own bad behaviour.

Suffice it to say, this sorry episode has been an excellent example of why ethics are so important in journalism. We’re in this mess because they’ve disappeared from every walk of life and the guilty use similar tactics at deflection when held to account. It gets dirty and underhand. You need your wits about you to withstand the assault and hold firm.

Still, at least Miri has admitted the pedo parts in Delingpole’s book are indeed ‘weird and inappropriate’. Better late than never. If she was to display some personal responsibility and prove she means it, she’d go a step further and apologise for all those rotten insults she flung my way for merely pointing out the obvious. Yes I’m old school. That would be the correct thing to do. If ethics were involved. She was bang out of order for responding in such a vitriolic manner.

Interestingly her associate, Francis O’Neill doesn’t seem to think that Delingpole’s pedo bits in his book are that big a deal. He chose the word ‘satire’ to describe them. Isn’t that revealing? Miri had written that Rod Liddle’s schtick about teachers shagging kids certainly wasn’t satire. I wonder does Francis O’Neill agree. He wrote in the comments about Delingpole:

You’ve got to laugh this point. This really shouldn’t be so difficult. It’s very telling that it’s turned into a bunfight. It didn’t have to be this way. Basic ethics would have avoided all of this.

Another funny one. Miri’s husband Mark Finch hasn’t stopped. He’s probably still in the comments sections letting off steam. He just won’t let go. All because I had the audacity to point out his wife’s double standards. He produced this ‘gotcha’ moment on X. He’s coming at me from many platforms! You’ve got to admire his determination and stamina.

Yes I used to write begging letters to Jimmy Savile as a kid hoping he’d fix it for me to meet Michael Jackson. Thankfully he never responded. This apparently, is on par with Miri giving special treatment to Delingpole, until forced to acknowledge his book. Make it make sense.

I’m beginning to realise most people don’t really get how ethics work and I’m wondering if it’s because we’ve turned our backs on God. This stuff should be easy. New Age thinking must be responsible for the confusion. Your truth, my truth malarkey.

Poor ole Mark he’s frothing at the mouth. Here he is on Substack genuinely concerned about my mental health. Isn’t he lovely?

Anyway there are enough people involved in this bunfight without adding any more but the overarching lesson here is that without ethics, we get substandard journalism. We get lies, misdirection, projection, obfuscation, deflection, gaslighting and lots and lots of frenzied insults.

We need ethics.

We need people who understand them and cherish them. We need people who can call it as it is straight way. No delays. No prodding. No persuasion.

Ethics help avoid so much trouble down the road.

Miri and Mark Finch, feel free to apologise at your ease.

You were wrong. Your response was wrong.

Take personal responsibility.

Do the right thing.

Related articles:

Blind spot or turning a blind eye? Miri AF and the Delingpole problem

Tricky questions: Doc Malik holds James Delingpole to account

Her bout of amnesia concerns James Delingpole’s Thinly Disguised Autobiography, a book she got quite giddy about on July 02, 2023 on her Substack. She wrote:

Back some time in the swirling mists of the dim and distant past (about 2005), I happened to read a very funny book. It was called, “Thinly Disguised Autobiography”, and I was attracted to it because of the clowns on the front cover - little did I know at the time what an apt metaphor for the world stage show that would end up being - and what I could have predicted even less was that, 15-odd years later, I would end up having a rather splendid, and consummately conspiratorial, chat with its author...

He’s one of the consistently best, most eloquent, and incisive voices in our movement, so it was a genuine pleasure and honour to be interviewed by Mr. James Delingpole.

Miri is one of the few people who has actually read the book which I’ve highlighted previously for its creepy bits about Delingpole’s character/himself fancying a child and fantasising about running away with him. The clowns on the cover take on a different teint when the contents are read. Apparently I’m a ‘smear merchant’ for respectfully attempting to get an updated response from Miri about these disturbing passages but it’s supposedly fine if she writes about recently deceased journalist Rod Liddle’s pedo pushing agenda in her latest Substack articles, Psychos, schizos and Rod Liddle. From her reaction on X, it’s unclear which category Miri AF fits into herself.

Double standards always show up on the radar. They blip like anomalies that warrant investigation. It’s just the way it is. It’s journalism. It’s why journalism - basic questions - can be so powerful. Of course the discerning reader spots these things. For daring to point out the obvious, Miri has accused me of being ‘sly and disingenuous, gaslighting and insinuatory’.

I’ve clearly hit a nerve. Why can’t she just admit the pedo bits in Delingpole’s book are weird, just like she did with Rod Liddle’s writing? It’s not exactly a big ask. Instead, she’s pulled the memory loss card and is desperately trying to accuse me of ‘smearing’ her even though what I’m asking is perfectly reasonable. It’s par for the course. She should have corrected the record long ago. I shouldn’t have to ask.

We had quite the exchange on X on Saturday, August 08, 2026. It was easy for me because I know I’m in the right, what I’m saying is grounded in fact, reference marks there for all to read in the public forum. Bread and butter journalism. Miri AF, on the other hand, played dirty, displaying all the traits she claims she’s subjected to by trolls. It was quite astonishing and revealing.

‘As others have said’! I love that bit. I’ve no doubt ‘others have said’ a great deal about me. Asking basic questions tends to get you into a lot of trouble. It’s revealing how upset some people get when asked the most basic questions. It says more about them than the questions or the questioner, it acts as a red flag. It’s why journalism will never die. We need it to survive. It’s how we figure out the wolves in sheep’s clothing.

Do you see the way Miri keeps reframing the conversation to put her in victim mode and to make out I’m the baddie for asking a question that needs to be addressed? Isn’t Miri clever with words? She most certainly is but I’m pretty good at seeing through word manipulation so her attempts to silence and undermine me don’t work. Frankly she was ‘flying off the handle’ and engaging in ‘histrionics’. She had no solid defence so she went with the insults option, a sure sign of losing the argument. Frankly, Miri was no better than the ‘psychos’ she describes in her Substack piece.

One of the most revealing parts of our online spat came when I pointed out that Doc Malik had held James Delingpole to account about the pedo passages in his thinly disguised autobiography (and he hadn’t even read the book!). Anyone paying attention would have detected that James Delingpole has a thing about Doc Malik and so does Miri. It’s like they want to take him down, like he’s getting in the way. Going on zero evidence and attempting to smear Doc Malike as a deflection tactic, Miri went for the troll’s favourite low blow, character assassination. All suggestion and speculation, as we’ve come to expect. No actual proof.

How much longer can Miri pretend she can’t remember the pedo bits in Delingpole’s weird book? As long as her readership allow, as long as they tolerate her sudden bout of amnesia. If they’re ok with letting it slide, slide it will. That’s generally how it works.

Maybe they see her as the victim of a terrible smear campaign. Leave poor Miri alone! She doesn’t deserve to be held to account. That’s her job!

Yes histrionics is the appropriate word.

Berating fair inquiry does not equate to ‘calm, reasonable and measured’ no matter how clever you are with word salad.

So come on, Miri. Tell us what you really think about Delingpole’s book that you chirped so enthusiastically about in 2023. Try to jog that rusty ole memory of yours. I’ve highlighted all the dodgy bits to help you recall, to get those neurons fired up. You don’t have to re-read the full thing. It got quite boring near the end anyway, as you probably don’t remember.

This whole thing is looking more like a case of turning a blind eye than a blind spot and it’s curiously revealing.

The question is why does Delingpole get off the hook while Rod Liddle (or Roddle Liddle as I like to call him) gets the full analysis? Miri’s memory working tickety-boo for Liddle’s lustful thoughts.

Double standards have a funny way of exposing hypocrisy.

Don’t blame me. I didn’t write the weird book that Miri claims to forget. Yet for noticing the creepy bits, I’m gaslighting, apparently. Don’t think it’s me that’s doing the gaslighting.

This is what projection looks like.

Further reading:

James Delingpole, MI5 and his thinly disguised autobiography

Tricky questions: Doc Malik holds James Delingpole to account

A Quare Fellow: James Delingpole has crossed the line

Suspicious behaviour: James Delingpole pretends he’s unaware of RDH’s Saffie Roussos theory

Oh look! There’s RDH telling James Delingpole about his Saffie Roussos theory!

“I’m glad to be here, finally, after almost six years, to face my accusers and I hope to make a good case for my view of how things panned out during the Covid era,” says Dr Pat Morrissey on the first day of his fitness-to-practise hearing at the Medical Council, Kingram House in Dublin.

Dr Pat Morrissey, a GP, husband and father of three sons, based in the village of Adare in Co Limerick, faces seven allegations of professional misconduct and poor professional performance. Among them prescribing Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine to treat symptoms of what can be loosely termed Covid.

“I am heartened by the support here today including fellow doctors and I met a doctor here from Spain as well who happened to drop in to lend her support. So word has seeped out,” says Dr Morrissey.

Dr Pat Morrissey was joined at the top table of the inquiry room by Dr Marcus De Brun who was found guilty of misconduct on June 4, 2026 after blowing the whistle on the nursing home scandal during the so-called pandemic year of 2020. Dr De Brun dramatically resigned from the Medical Council in April 2020 in protest at the way the elderly were being treated under the banner of Covid. He was the first Irish medic to publicly highlight the use of Midazolam and end-of-life protocols in nursing homes.

Also there in a show of support for Dr Morrissey were fellow dissident GPs Dr Vincent Carroll, Dr Gerry Waters and Dr Anne McCloskey who have used their voices to warn the public about the dangers of the Covid injections, at considerable personal cost.

The excess deaths since the rollout of the shots the IMC called safe and effective vaccines has proven Dr Morrissey and his colleagues correct in their early assessment. The injections were too dangerous and unproven to put into anybody’s arm. It’s become painfully obvious that Dr Morrissey was right not to administer the Covid shots, instead he used tried and tested treatments on his patients who presented with symptoms they believed were Covid. Considering the tests to diagnose the mystery virus were untrustworthy at best, fraudulent at worst, there’s no real way of knowing what these patients were suffering from. Nonetheless Dr Morrissey treated their symptoms in the best way he saw fit and by doing so he undermined the subsequent jab hysteria witnessed the world over. Same playbook. Lockstep.

What exactly has Dr Morrissey done wrong?

Ultimately he has undermined public health policies that endangered lives. Reckless public health policies that deserved to be undermined and called out.

They still need to be highlighted and exposed.

And perhaps this is the best way to do it, before the Medical Council. On the record.

Whether or not you agree with Dr Morrissey for treating a mystery virus that has yet to be isolated, it doesn’t really matter. The main thing is he’s a stick in the spokes of the machine and his presence at Kingram House gives us another opportunity to show the excess deaths since the shots and talk about the increase in clots, heart problems and cancers.

Dr Morrissey has already won.

The faceless Medical Council are only exposing their own fitness-to-practise inadequacies by recalling his tweets and rallying cries.

They’re the ones who have put the Irish public in danger by promoting a series of injections that were far from safe and effective for a mystery virus that was no more virulent than the flu, where ever that went.

They are the ones with a case to answer, not Dr Pat Morrissey.

Further analysis:

Independent journalist Louise Roseingrave has all the details on the allegations against Dr Pat Morrissey:

Doctor in the Dock for Treating Covid Patients

Louise Roseingrave

Doctor in the Dock for Treating Covid Patients

Inquiry opens at the IMC, Kingram House, Dublin on Tuesday July 21st and is scheduled to run for three days…

Read more

a month ago · 36 likes · 26 comments · Louise Roseingrave

Artist and writer Francis O’Neill has been like a sniffer dog of late. He’s discovered a trail. He’s not quite sure where it leads but there’s enough of a scent to be onto something worth investigating further. So on he goes. His readers in hot pursuit. A hunt, of sorts.

This is how conspiracy theorist-in-chief Miri AF summed it up: What Francis appears to have uncovered with his diligent research is a large, interlinked network of state operatives and actors who are engaged in psychological operations to manage and subdue the dissident class. ‘Chasing Dissent‘, as police sergeant John Porter’s podcast puts it.

It’s all very interesting. Will the trail run cold? Or will he catch his prey conclusively? No room for escape. The main question for the moment is was there really a funeral for Ed the Techie? Or did his passing signify something else? We’re not quite sure. Doubt has crept in thanks to O’Neill’s investigations. Many of us are left wondering if cartoonist Bob Moran could be a Freemason or a member of some kind of shady secret society considering all the heavy clues he’s dropping. Surely not BOB. Please not Bob Moran too! He’s been one of the most exceptional talents when it comes to exposing the evil plans of the New World Order, a beacon in the dark. His artwork combined with his clear voice and theatre productions have hit the bullseye repeatedly. If he is controlled opposition, what’s his role? What has he done wrong? Where has he misdirected his audience? That’s not exactly clear from O’Neill’s analysis. It’s more guilt by association.

In fairness to O’Neill, he’s within his rights to ask why Moran is charging €33,000 of all figures for his GOTCHA work depicting Bill Gates as a clown holding two syringes with the word GOTCHA overhead? On the front door of the installation there’s an image of a defibrillator kit. It’s devastatingly clever. Very BOB which means very niche. Only those who dodged the shots would be interested in purchasing such a piece, surely. Most of them/us are paying a high price for going up against the machine, many of us still counting the cost of saying NO to the toxic injections. It wasn’t exactly a career move blowing up all those bridges. Can’t see too many dissenters with those kind of readies to spare for an art installation that would offend most of their friends and family who dared to draw near.

It would have been helpful if Moran had rounded the figure up or down and went for a clean €35,000 or €30,000 just to avoid this kind of scrutiny. He must have expected these questions. Maybe the former Telegraph cartoonist is just playing with the number for kicks. If so, I wish he wouldn’t. It’s confusing. For clarity, we really should leave these nods and winks to the Freemasons. Let your no be your no and your yes be your yes. Simple. Avoids these kind of pickles.

O’Neill is also within his rights to enquire about the choice of venue following Moran’s show Pendant’s Revolt. Of all the pubs to choose from in London, why did Moran’s gang end up in Satan’s Whiskers after the show? Satan’s bloody Whiskers! Of course it was going to raise eyebrows. We’re literally dealing with a bunch of psychopathic satanists who are trying to poison and replace us en masse. We’re constantly on the look out for satanic clues and here’s a big juicy one falling straight into our laps. Why be so deliberate? Most people who’ve followed Bob Moran like him a lot and don’t wish to put him under any undue pressure but this is weird and needs to be addressed.

The choice of venue goes beyond being playful. It’s extremely unhelpful and begs for further inquiry. O’Neill has also pointed us in the direction of Bob’s brother Tom Moran, a writer and producer responsible for The Devil’s Hour (2022), an Amazon Prime series that tells the story of Lucy Chambers, a social worker who wakes at exactly 3:33 am every morning, after experiencing terrifying visions. The name Lucy Chambers isn’t far from Lucy Connolly, the mother who supposedly did jail time for a race hate tweet. Miri AF’s excellent dissection of Lucy Connolly’s role embedded in the dissenters camp exposes more strange shenanigans. All is not as it seems.

Miri AF on Lucy Connolly:

I simply don’t believe that there is any risk of anyone, much less an upstanding councillor’s wife with no criminal record, being sent to prison for a Tweet.

I certainly believe, however, that the establishment would like you to think there is such a risk, in order to frighten you out of sharing your thoughts online.

So, how do they successfully sew this behaviour-modifying fear into you?

They do what they always do:

Stage a psyop.

The coincidences keep stacking up. As yet there’s just a whiff that something’s off. Awkward questions are required. No sacred cows.

In the comments section of O’Neill’s forensic study The curious case of Ed the Techie and Bob Moran (June 5, 2026) I reminded him that he has his own blind spots. His 12 part series on Victims or Actors? backed up the ‘no bomb, no victims’ theory propagated by Richard D Hall and his network on the Manchester Arena bombing but failed to provide proof the victims were faking it for the cameras despite the length and detail of the analysis. A false conclusion, in other words, based on ill-informed judgments. The very thing Francis O’Neill warns against.

So O’Neill has yet to secure a case against Delingpole. Really? There’s nothing a little bit suspicious about Delingpole’s operation that might warrant some investigation? I find that hard to believe and it raises questions in the direction of O’Neill’s integrity. Delingpole is the guy who desperately wanted to be in the Bullingdon Club at Oxford along with this pals Boris Johnston and David Cameron. He’s is The Establishment. Are we really to believe he’s still writing for normies who read The Spectator but is also a leading dissident? Come on! This isn’t hard. It’s doesn’t require a 12 part series to figure out. You don’t get to keep your job in the mainstream media while slagging off the mainstream media, unless there’s another deal at play.

Also I would say O’Neill is playing dumb when he says that Delingpole ‘amplifying genuine people suggests he is genuine’. No it doesn’t, it just means Delingpole is using genuine people to look genuine as any good counterintelligence operation would do. He has to gain trust before convincing his audience of misdirection like the ‘no bomb, no victims’ conclusion for the Manchester Arena blast. His audience trust him, that’s why they believe him. That’s why they repeat the lies. They can’t believe darling Delingpole would mislead them.

Did O’Neill not think it was a bit creepy that Delingpole wrote in his Thinly Disguised Autobiography that he fancied a child and had fantasised about running away with him? Did that not strike him as a bit odd? I don’t think O’Neill would let Bob Moran away with such an admission but for Delingpole, that’s ok as long as he gets a platform to air his views. Miri AF writes about the dark side of children’s author Roald Dahl but nothing on Delingole’s sinister side. She even endorsed his creepy little book. Dodgy AF.

Sorry but it’s not just Bob Moran who needs to answer some awkward questions. Looks like the whole scene is riddled with anomalies and question marks. This is why we can’t trust each other and it’s also why we shouldn’t trust each other. There are too many agendas at play. One of them being that ‘everything is fake’ when some things are not. Sometimes there are real victims who aren’t crisis actors. Speculation isn’t enough to convict them as I’ve proven with the Manchester Arena bombing misdirection.

Even Iain Davis who wrote a book ignoring the victims admits people died that night on May 22, 2017. It kind of ruins his ‘no bomb, no victims’ BS conclusion. If people died that night, what killed them? A loud bang? The ‘no bomb, no victims’ conclusion made fools of those who repeated the lie (millions of them) and it exposed as Miri AF might say an interlinked network of state operatives and actors who are engaged in psychological operations to manage and subdue the dissident class.

That’s David A. Hughes flashing the devil horns during the same interview. Apparently that’s how you make the sign for inverted commas these days.

Considering Francis O’Neill also pushed the ‘no bomb, no victims’ misdirection, this means he must also fall under investigation as to why he chose that route without proper proof the victims were actors. Maybe it was just herd mentality. Maybe it’s something else. Yes there are false flags but sometimes real people get killed and dismissing them as crisis actors without proper evidence is satanic in and of itself.

I’m aware that this is an unpopular subject and won’t win me likes or validation due to the level of brainwashing from phoney false flag investigators but the objective Truth must be all we care about if we’re honestly searching for answers. The ‘no bomb, no victims’ lie exposed a network of fake dissidents whose investigations led to a false conclusion.

Richard D Hall’s network for example. His counterpart in Ireland, Gemma O’Doherty, also propagated the lie that nobody died that night and that there was no bomb, that it was all staged, a big budget pyrotechnics show. She said something similar about the Parnell Square stabbings which turned out to be real. It’s her gig, part of her role as embedded fake dissident. Here she is mocking Martin Hibbert’s efforts at rehabilitation while claiming he was an actor in The Bill. Martin Hibbert wasn’t an actor in The Bill. It’s false information and part of the reason why so many critical thinkers believe Martin Hibbert is a crisis actor. Mud sticks.

In July 2022, the Supreme Court of Ireland dismissed an appeal by Gemma O'Doherty and John Waters ending their challenge against the constitutionality of the State's Covid-19 lockdown legislation.

Funny enough it was Bob Moran’s interview with Doc Malik from July 2, 2025 that highlighted how these kind of court cases work in the counterintelligence world. From the outside it looks like the dissidents are sticking up for the little people when in reality they’re ensuring there’s no legal framework to take on the totalitarian creep.

“Simon Dolan, that guy. He just appeared and he was everywhere and with loads of money and he decided to sue the government. And I’ve spoken to other lawyers who do kind of understand since, what the problems are, who said that entire case was designed to fail. That was an absolute staged thing so that people would think, ‘oh we can’t take legal action. There is no legal basis against this stuff. We can’t use the legal system’. Because the way all of those arguments are put together, they said you would not, it’s like they’ve written their arguments on purpose so they wouldn’t get through so the judge would basically throw them out. So it was a complete show trial. It was nonsense”.

Nice red brick freemasonic wall behind Simon Dolan for his Guardian photo. This is how the network operates: gain trust from dissidents, appear to be fighting for the cause but ultimately the aim is to protect the regime and undermine those speaking out against its tyrannical grip. This is why the Manchester Arena bombing serves as a prime example of how those of a conspiratorial mindset can be manipulated into reaching the wrong conclusion by those appearing to be on side. I know many of you out there fell for the Manchester Arena con and this one is particularly difficult to wrap your heads around but wrap your heads around it you must or you’ll be manipulated into another false conclusion by those you thought you could trust. We can’t afford these kind of mistakes at this late stage in the game. We must demand excellence in these investigations. It’s up to the readers and who they choose to support. Look how that’s gone so far. Suggestion and speculation serve a purpose but they’re not enough to form a solid conclusion.

If Francis O’Neill is genuinely looking for answers and I’m not fully sure either way, he’s going to have to reassess his stance on the Manchester Arena bombing. Otherwise he appears to be part of an interlinked network of state operatives and actors who are engaged in psychological operations to manage and subdue the dissident class.

Those are the optics.

We’re deep down the rabbit hole with all of this.

Is everyone a baddie? Well anyone unconcerned about the objective Truth is certainly not a goodie. Anyone misdirecting their audience on purpose is not a goodie. Anyone taking money to mislead is not a goodie. Anyone pretending to be a dissident while working for the other side is not a goodie. The lake of fire awaits.

Just like those normies who love their fake idols and false prophets of influencers, TV presenters, actors and politicians there are those on this side of the fence who’ll defend their fake idols and false prophets to the last breath, just because they say the right things some of the time. Brainwashing works across the board. The ‘no bomb, no victims’ conclusion on Manchester proves that. The fake awake.

Who can we trust in such an environment?

Only God.

Maybe that’s the purpose of the test after all.

Related articles:

A Quare Fellow: James Delingpole has crossed the line

Suspicious behaviour: James Delingpole pretends he’s unaware of RDH’s Saffie Roussos theory

Oxford’s infamous Bullingdon Club includes Candace Owens’ husband George Farmer, Boris Johnson and David Cameron alongside wannabe member James Delingpole

Exposed: another ‘no victims’ phoney false flag conclusion laid bare

John Waters claims Tucker Carlson’s team may have accidentally booked the Freemasons’ Hall in Dublin

Defending convicted sex offenders: the problem with journalist Gemma O’Doherty and Epstein’s former libel lawyer Paul Tweed’s take

Have you noticed how the mainstream media have no problem covering excess mortality if it suits their agenda?

They ignored the shocking levels of excess mortality following the rollout of the safe and effectives but are all over the increase in deaths for the heatwave hitting Europe. This shows us they're aware of the mortality figures but pick and choose how they use them for whatever agenda they're being paid to promote.

There’s no point in talking about man-made climate change without first acknowledging the near constant infusion of chemicals into our atmosphere which we’re supposed to believe are condensation from airplanes or vapour trails. Yet in the US, Tennessee, Florida, and Montana have successfully passed legislation banning intentional geoengineering and solar radiation modification. Legislators in more than 35 states have introduced similar bills. Another conspiracy theory come true. You’ll notice the subject of geoengineering is avoided when mainstream media journalists doomsday report on man-made climate change. Try mentioning it on social media and the bot armies show up to downplay the chemical warfare we’re up against on a daily basis. It’s nothing, move along.

Spray agent Bill Gates and the Epstein predator class have created the overheating problem and will soon offer the solution. In the meantime air conditioning sales are up. Just like the Covid scam, instead of saving Granny, we can expect climate change lockdowns to save the planet along with carbon credits to limit travel and movement. It’s a good excuse to enforce the totalitarian rulebook we glimpsed during the Covid hoax - staying indoors, working from home, having our movements tracked and traced, being criminalised for breathing freely, for merely existing. We are the carbon they want to reduce. Many of us could see the danger approaching then but we were sent tinfoil hat memes by those who truly believed there was a scary virus in the air and who couldn’t grasp the extent of the deceit. Doctors chose the lie because it made them richer. Extract money from the equation and they would have refused to play along with the hoax. They know this deep down. The few who declined the offer to get involved can hold their heads high.

After years of ignoring the excess mortality problem since the Covid injections, the mainstream media are suddenly paying heed to the extra numbers dying as temperatures across Europe sizzle.

This is an opportunity to show those who don’t get it yet that our excess mortality issues started well before the summer of 2026. Wheel them back to 2020 - the year of the supposed pandemic. Show them the one peak in April 2020 related to killer medical interventions, not Covid. Tell them a deadly contagious airborne virus doesn’t behave this way. It would show up each month. It would build, not fall off a cliff. Show them the contrast between 2020 and 2024 as an example.

Excess Mortality Comparison

53.1KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Let them see that excess deaths were significantly higher in 2024 as opposed to 2020, the year we were told there was a deadly virus in the air. By 2024 the safe and effectives were supposed to have worked their magic. Let them see that the death rate had increased and the mainstream media were keeping quiet about the problem because they were complicit in pushing the toxic shots and in keeping the pandemic lie going in the imaginations of the public.

The injections weren’t saving lives as promised by the mainstream media gallery of highly paid presenters, journalists and influencers. They were making matters worse. This was never analysed by those friendly, familiar faces who had told their readers and viewers the shots were safe and effective. They carried on. Business as usual. On to the next story. As if tricking their audience into a dangerous medical trial then ignoring the excess deaths was no biggie.

We must continue to bring up the excess mortality data so more people understand the con. Show them the difference between 2020 (fake pandemic year) and 2023, for example, when we were told by the WHO everything was under control thanks to the injections that skipped the usual safety markers. Clearly not. At this time the mainstream media were busy normalising sudden deaths in our young (no cause of death required) and disseminating cancer stories as if they were just something that happen that we have to deal with. Just one of those things.

A simple glance at these graphs tells us the shots were designed to do harm.

Excess Deaths 2023

51.8KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Year on year, it’s plain to see, our excess mortality problems started with the injections. And yet the mainstream media pretend otherwise. They know. They knew what they were doing at the time too. Convincing their friends and families to roll up their sleeves for the common good, all the while understanding there was no great threat in 2020. The flu hadn’t disappeared. The whole thing was nonsense. Nobody died from Covid. They were killed. On purpose. To fake a pandemic.

Excess Deaths 2022

51.6KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

It is vital that we understand the scam clearly if we’re to take decisive action the next time the parasite class attempt to pull the wool over our eyes, for the next scary virus or more likely a climate change lockdown. So far not enough people are interested in understanding how and why they were scammed from 2020 onwards. Those who haven’t died suddenly or who’ve avoided the long list of after-effects from the shots seem content that they dodged a bullet. That’s enough. Many are still afraid of being labelled a conspiracy theorist if they dare to recognise the extent of the fraud. That’s some level of brainwashing.

We have to help interrupt the programming. Let them see how the excess mortality figures went up after the injections. Let them see they were conned into rolling up their sleeves. Let them understand April 2020, that it was medical interventions, not Covid that caused the spike in deaths. Make them care. That’s our task.

We understand the mainstream media will not do it for us. We know the doctors are caught in a system that won’t allow dissent. We can see the institutions are bought. It’s up to us to expose the corruption or accept its consequences. That means we have work to do.

Compare 2020 (fake pandemic year) to 2021, the year the injections rolled out and watch those excess deaths rise, month on month. It’s an outrage the mainstream media misled their audience into believing it was Covid that was killing more people, when it was really the shots doing what they were designed to do. The anti-vaxxers were trying to prevent this carnage. They were never the enemy.

Excess Deaths 2021

51.6KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

So now with this heatwave or whatever it is, we have the mainstream media finally discussing excess mortality openly which we should take as an opening for further discussion. There’s no doubt the heat does play a role in causing more people to die than usual. The cold too causes excess mortality, that must also be factored in during the winter months. We don’t have to attribute every excess death to the toxic shots but we need to have the conversation and we need to bring it back to 2020. That was the year this major assault on humanity started. We could go back further but as a starting point 2020 works.

If the mainstream media are going to bring up excess mortality, good. We’ll bring it up too. We have plenty to say on the subject, graphs and all.

Turn everything into an opportunity.

Show them.

Related articles:

Timeline of a fake pandemic: Ireland January 2020-June 2020

Timeline of a Fake Pandemic: Ireland, July 2020 - December 2020

You’ll find when analysing these reports that there’s never any mention of Dr Gerry Waters' TV past when he used to appear on shows such as 12 to 1, Live at 3 and Open House with hosts Marty Whelan, Ciana Campbell, Derek Davis, Thelma Mansfield and Mary Kennedy. For about nine years from the mid-90s Dr Waters was a regular on Irish television, even appearing on the Late Late Show. He was interviewed by broadcaster Pat Kenny and appeared on an array of discussion programs.

“Every time they needed a medical opinion in a hurry I was called. Sometimes it was a phone-in or I’d hop on my motorbike and head to Montrose studios,” says Dr Waters.

It’s a sure sign of guilt when mainstream media coverage of Dr Waters’ case omits these details or any photos of this high profile doctor who is far from camera-shy and has a scrap book filled with positive news articles about him. Omitting his photograph is a way of minimising Dr Waters’ relevance and of dismissing his argument, one that blows asunder the Covid scam.

With this in mind I swung by Celbridge in Co. Kildare to spend a few sunny hours with the spritely 76-year-old father of four and to find out a bit more about the man who stood up to the Covid machine and won’t back down. If the established media refuse to show his face, we (those who understand the seriousness of the situation) must fill the gaps as best we can. Mobile phones will do. Interrupting the programming is essential.

On a walk around the grounds of Castletown House where Dr Waters once lived for 12 years with his wife Trish and family, he said:

“I recognised in 2020 that there was no virus of any great pathogenicity. I said it. I said it to my patients. I said it to the ICGP. I said it to the Department of Health. I said it to the Medical Council. I said it to everybody who’d listen. There’s nothing there. I was ringing around my colleagues asking them, ‘What are you seeing?’ and they kept saying they were seeing nothing. ‘There’s nothing there, Ger’.

And I refused to mask. I refused to social distance. I refused to go along with all the hocus pocus that they directed us to. And then when the vaccine came out, I refused to give the vaccine on the principal that I wouldn’t put into your arm what I wouldn’t put into my own arm”.

It’s no surprise the mainstream media won’t show his photo in their coverage. If the wider public understood the extent to which they’ve been manipulated, they’d lose all confidence in the journalists who convinced them they needed a series of dangerous injections for a mystery virus.

The more time that passes, the more obvious it is that Dr Waters was right all along. Again, the complicit mainstream media won’t cover the mounting evidence that the shots were toxic and unnecessary, that the whole thing was a scam run by the Epstein predator class for nefarious ends. Instead they’re busy normalising cancer stories and running tribute pieces for young people who have died suddenly, no cause of death provided. The new normal.

Against this backdrop, there’s Dr. Gerry Waters, still camera-ready, still up for a TV or radio debate with anyone brave enough to take him on.

RTÉ producers don’t call these days. They know what can’t be discussed on their shows. The presenters know what not to ask. More people in the audience are beginning to understand the deal thanks to voices like Dr Waters, unrelenting and insistent.

He’s the TV doc who chose not to sell out and that makes him a formidable force, with or without mainstream media coverage.

You can find Dr Gerry Waters on X HERE

They want to mass test everybody to tell them that everyone has cancer. Then create vaccines off of the back of this fraudulent data. So then inject you and say ‘Ah look! Either you don’t have cancer anymore,’ which is what they’ve done with HIV for a long, long time is take a fraudulent test, tell you that you have HIV, give you a drug that makes the test negative, that doesn’t do anything other than make the test negative and say, ‘Here! We’ve solved the problem!’.

So there is this pipeline of having fraudulent tests, a drug that turns the test negative. You take the drug which also has a few niceties rolled in there that it will cause all sorts of degenerative diseases if you take it for long enough that we can then pass you on to the next department within the medical establishment that can then juice you for all the money and health that you have and then kind of spit you out the other side.

So they are rolling this out with cancer, with PCR tests and with ‘genetically’ designed vaccines.

Jamie Andrews, Virology Sceptic

Jamie Andrews is on a mission to prove virology is a dangerous non-science used to manipulate people through testing scams that range from 'Covid' to cancer. He's project managing the largest Open Source and Crowdfunded experiment conducting controls to expose the flaws in virology and The $cience™ in general. His work is already having a profound effect dismantling the corporate lies of a multi billion euro Big Pharma machine which uses celebrities and influencers to sell its products by any means necessary.

In this interview we discuss the great danger these tests pose to the wider public and why it’s never a good idea to blindly trust The $cience™, especially when there’s vast sums of money involved.

It’s time to test the tests, out in the open, full transparency.

Jamie Andrews wants to show us what’s done in the dark and bring it into the light for proper analysis.

Full interview:

You can find Jamie on X HERE

and on substack.com/@controlstudies

If the greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist and if his second greatest trick was convincing the world he is the good guy, then perhaps his third greatest trick was getting millions to believe Hell isn’t real.

If Hell isn’t real then do what thou wilt.

Life is much easier when you don’t believe Hell is an actual destination for damned souls who’ve allowed sin to keep them from God’s good graces. The fire and brimstone threat is a bit of a downer. It’s feels like a manipulative tool to control the masses and keep them in line. Hell doesn’t chime with the ‘positive thoughts only’ mantra drummed into New Age thinking skulls to ward off any negative vibes. We rarely hear a priest or a pastor mention Hell with a capital H these days from the pulpit. Imagine listening to a sermon like this one from preacher Paul Washer of a Sunday.

“I will not lose sleep, understand this, worrying whether or not you have self-esteem. I will not lose sleep worried about whether or not you feel like you’ve got purpose in your life. I will not lose sleep. I will not be interceding tonight because your cheque book doesn’t balance. It will be because you’re going to Hell. That’s why we preach.”

Would the collective behave differently in life if we knew fore sure that Hell exists? Hell yeah. Would the Covid scam have been possible, for example, if people feared eternal damnation for their sins? There’s not a chance it would have succeeded the way it did if people understood the repercussions of their actions and words in this realm. The fraud was only allowed to take hold because of wonky morals, the absence of ethics, New Age thinking, fake nice combined with fake science and money lust.

An honest Christian could never accept a medical product derived from aborted foetal cell lines no matter who in authority said it was grand. It wasn’t a hard test. An honest Christian wouldn’t close the door on his neighbour because he declined such an abhorrent injection. An honest Christian would have spotted the wolves in sheep’s clothing masquerading as the good guys with their safe and effective solution to the phantom virus that had replaced the flu. The Covid scam separated the wheat from the chaff in some ways although there were plenty of wolves in sheep’s clothing in there too. The refining process has yet to be completed. There remains more chances of redemption if only these errors were acknowledged and acted upon. True mercy. So many opportunities to correct course. There can be no moving on from a test of this magnitude. The consequences play out daily in sudden deaths, cancer diagnoses, heart attacks and clots. We’re being shown how our compliance with tyranny has real-life repercussions. It didn’t have to be this way. We could have said NO. Free will.

So if this life is some kind of test, how’s it going? I’ve been watching Near Death Experience testimonies on YouTube of late, at least one or two a day. Tales from beyond our range of understanding, from people who have been clinically dead and have returned from that flat line with stories of Heaven and Hell, with grave warnings from Jesus to get our act together, that the end really is nigh, the Book of Life is nearing completion. Is it a psy-op? Maybe their stories are being used to push a certain agenda but they seem genuine, from all walks of life, across many nations, over many years.

Here’s one from a man who had a tough start in life which seems a bit unfair but as he says the Devil doesn’t care if you’re a child or a grandparent he will do whatever it takes to undermine the Kingdom of God.

According to these kind of testimonies, Hell is a place devoid of God, devoid of hope, devoid of mercy. No more chances. It’s not a makey-uppy place to threaten people with so they’ll behave. It actually exists. The message from those who return remains constant: it’s our sins that separate us from Heaven, our rejection of God’s offer of redemption. It’s down to us. We get to choose either way.

If we’re doing what thou wilt, over Thy will be done - looks like we’re headed south to join Aleister Crowley in that Lake of Fire. So much for sex, drugs and rock’n roll. It’s a trap.

If we’re at least attempting to do the will of God, we’ve a better chance at making it through the Pearly Gates but it’s our hearts that will be assessed in the end so nothing is guaranteed. If our intentions were impure, there will be no hiding that reality in the higher realms. Every day we have to prove our worth by the sounds of these testimonies. Hell seems to be full of people who thought they were saved but they were only going through the motions without conviction or they fell away from their faith through temptation.

In Luke Chapter 16, versus 19 to 31, Jesus tells the parable of the rich and the poor man named Lazarus who was afflicted by sores and who lay outside the rich man’s house in the hope of some leftovers from the table. They both died. The rich man ended up in Hades ‘where he was being tormented’. The poor man ‘was carried away by the angels to be with Abraham’.

In Hades he lifted up his eyes, being in torment, and saw Abraham far away and Lazarus in his bosom. And he cried out and said, ‘Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus so that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool off my tongue, for I am in agony in this flame.’ But Abraham said, ‘Child, remember that during your life you received your good things, and likewise Lazarus bad things; but now he is being comforted here, and you are in agony. And besides all this, between us and you there is a great chasm fixed, so that those who wish to come over from here to you will not be able, and that none may cross over from there to us.’ And he said, ‘Then I beg you, father, that you send him to my father’s house— for I have five brothers—in order that he may warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.’ But Abraham *said, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them hear them.’ But he said, ‘No, father Abraham, but if someone goes to them from the dead, they will repent!’ But he said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be persuaded even if someone rises from the dead.’ 

Maybe if we all had a Near Death Experience we’d know for sure what lies beyond but from this parable Jesus wants us to listen to the prophets and to pay heed before it’s too late.

Hell sounds so godforsaken I wouldn’t wish it on my worst enemy and I certainly don’t want to be one of those who thought she was saved only to end up there through pride or false doctrine or some such sin. I’ve listened to enough Near Death Experience testimonies to take these warnings of Hell seriously. I’d prefer if the place didn’t exist. I don’t want Hell to exist but I’m not in charge and my range of understanding is limited.

Perhaps we’re better off living our lives being aware of the consequences to sin. Perhaps we’re better off knowing why it’s important to seek forgiveness and mercy for our daily trespasses, to not be led into temptation. The Bible makes much more sense these days. The Covid scam showed us step by step why its teachings are still relevant to this day. We got to see how New Age thinking deceived people into believing they were doing the right thing by rolling up their sleeves, for the common good, for a series of toxic shots made by bad people with bad intentions. We got to see the false prophets, the false idol worship, the call to ‘Trust The $cience’, not God. It was all a sham and we were shown where, how and why. Incredible, really.

Sometimes I think people who fear death are just not ready to pass over. Their souls know there’s work to do and that’s why they fear dying. If they go now, there may be no coming back for a second chance. Better off getting the work done on this side of the divide so that when death comes, there’s no fear, just acceptance. No more clinging on, no more tests for this and that to buy more time.

We’ve just witnessed the consequences of living life like there’s no Hell, no repercussions for bad behaviour. We get a form of Hell on Earth. The Devil wins more souls. The demons run amok. The place starts to look more like a hellscape. People start to look more like zombies. Sin abounds. Life becomes less valuable.

In this context, it makes more sense to care about our words and deeds, understanding that there are consequences to our output. It makes more sense to accept the spiritual protection rather than to reject it out of pride or disbelief. There’s where humility comes in.

Perhaps it’s about time we started to see through the Devil’s trickery to avoid his traps and temptations. He is real. He’s not the good guy and Hell is his domain.

Let’s wrap up with Nirvana’s rendition of Lake of Fire by the Meat Puppets, MTV Unplugged in New York, 1993.

Kurt Cobain opens with:

“Where do bad folk go when they die? They don’t go to Heaven where the angels fly. They go to a lake of fire and fry, won’t see ‘em again ‘til the fourth of July”.

Not sure if we get to see them again. It’s all a big mystery but the more we witness here, the more likely it appears that there’s a lot more to this life than we’re led to believe. We spend more time dead than we do alive so it’s in our interest to consider the options.

What are the chances of TV presenter Jeremy Clarkson being attacked by a cow just four months after quoting the claim that you’d be more likely to be killed by a cow than get blood clots from the AstraZeneca Covid shots?

In his Times column from September 26, 2021, Clarkson wrote:

"Shortly after evidence began to emerge that the AstraZeneca vaccine could cause blood clots, we were told that you'd stand more chance of being killed by a cow. This sounded very reassuring, but the truth is that five people a year are killed by cattle in the UK. This makes them more dangerous than motor racing. A lot more."

It’s as if Clarkson is telling us the chances of getting a clot are a lot more than stated, certainly more than five a year. He’s playing with words. If we look at his own case, Clarkson had to have heart surgery to unblock arteries following his safe and effective AstraZeneca shots in October 2024 before going on to reveal that he underwent treatment for prostate cancer in the season finale of his hit Amazon Prime show Clarkson’s Farm.

By April 22, 2021 the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) had registered 168 people who had suffered blood clots after taking the AstraZeneca shot in Britain, including 32 deaths, as reported on RTÉ News. Not so very rare after all.

Clarkson would have been well aware of these startling figures at the time of writing his column in September 2021. He had brought up the death by cow odds in another of his Times columns on May 2, 2021.

"We read recently that you are just as likely to be killed by a cow as you are by an AstraZeneca-related blood clot, and that heartened us all because, obviously, the only people who are ever killed by cows are men in satin suits in Spain. Not so, it seems. Cows are incredibly dangerous."

Again Clarkson is being mischievous with words. It sounds like he’s saying the AstraZeneca shots are more or less risk-free before his dagger last sentence. If cows were incredibly dangerous, was he admitting the injections were too? It’s all cloaked in humour so the reader is left bemused and disarmed.

In March 2021, in his Sun column, Clarkson again made light of the clotting issue with the injections he chose to promote. He wrote about how ill he felt after the injection he did or didn’t take depending on what you believe:

“I suppose it could be a huge blood clot forming but I seriously doubt that. I suspect it’s more likely to be my bicep getting ready for the day when the pubs open and it’ll be called on to lift a pint”.

Despite the wonders of The $cience™, Clarkson apparently caught Covid a second time in April 2022 after somehow surviving the mystery virus in December 2020. In a message to his 4.6 million followers on Instagram, Clarkson posted a snap of a positive Covid test.

He simply wrote: “B*****s”.

He later wrote in his Sunday Times column:

“With every illness I’ve had, there has always been a sense that medicine and time would eventually ride to the rescue, but with Covid-19 you have to lie there, on your own, knowing that medicine is not on its way and that time is your worst enemy”.

What about the safe and effectives? By this stage it was abundantly clear that the shots were having devastating consequences, not for Jeremy Clarkson. Who knows if he was just hamming it up for the cameras? For real people who had taken the AstraZeneca shots in good faith, on the understanding that you’d a higher chance of being killed by cow than getting a clot from the jab.

By May 25, 2022 the MHRA had recorded 443 cases of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS) including 81 deaths. Most of these events followed the first dose. This figure of 81 clotting deaths after the AstraZeneca jab is still used in the mainstream media to this day but it only gives us an idea of the fallout from the shots. How many more people died as a result of the jabs after May 25, 2022? How many died of non-clotting issues before May 25, 2022? It’s unclear, on purpose.

The Telegraph reports that 51 cases of TTS as a result of the AstraZeneca jabs have been lodged in the High Court in the UK, with victims and grieving relatives seeking damages estimated to be worth up to £100 million.

AstraZeneca bosses are at pains to point out that their product information was updated in April 2021, with the approval of the UK regulator, to include “the possibility that the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine is capable, in very rare cases, of being a trigger for” TTS.

It’s incredible that a personality like Jeremy Clarkson would choose to promote a dangerous medical product in such a jovial, reckless manner. Worse still, that the pharmaceutical industry is allowed to use celebrities to push risky medical products on unassuming audiences. Those years of trust built up over endless episodes and reruns of Top Gear and Who wants to be a Millionaire? are paying dividends for the boardroom suits. This kind of shameless marketing needs to be banned immediately. The public needs to draw the line on this nonsense. No more celebs/influencers/pop stars/tv presenters/tv doctors flogging Big Pharma products that come with a list of side-effects (effects) that could fill a dictionary.

It still hasn’t been disclosed how much Jeremy Clarkson was paid to promote the dangerous injections but we can be certain he didn’t do it for free. No broadcaster/columnist of his rank is going to give that much publicity for free to a multi-billion euro pharmaceutical giant. His agent would have cut him a good deal.

To hammer home the point that the shots were more deadly than advertised in January 2022 we see the mainstream media running headlines about Jeremy Clarkson’s encounter with a cow that had an interest in killing him. The joke is that the bovine left him with smashed testicles. Funny until you consider the fertility implications from the so-called vaccines promoted by Jeremy Clarkson and his celebrity pals, for profit. Clots are only one of the many repercussions from the AstraZeneca shots.

The popular presenter described the incident as“the lowest point in my farming career to date. Being attacked by a cow while on my knees in the mud, in a storm, with smashed testicles”.

Clarkson is a laugh which is why he gets away with so much but when you consider the amount people whose lives have been destroyed by the AstraZeneca shots, perhaps that cow was doing us all a favour in that moment of engagement with Clarkson’s nuts.

“…having failed to connect with her hoofs, she went for another tack — putting her head between my legs and then raising it smartly”.

Here’s a small sample of the lives lost as a direct result of the unnecessary and toxic AstraZeneca injections promoted by the likes of Jeremy Clarkson as safe and effective, kinda.

For the pharmaceutical giant, the Covid shot was a cash cow. By February 2022, profits were up significantly due to jab sales with the company recording revenue of €32.8 billion, €3.5 billion from the dangerous shots for the phantom virus. The lives destroyed along the way, collateral damage.

In a strange twist of cow tales, Jeremy Clarkson has helped to expose the TB testing scam on Clarkson’s Farm. Virology control study project manager and scientist Jamie Andrews explains on X:

Even Jabber Jeremy Clarkson can understand the absurdity with the Bovine TB test. They inject a load of chemical gunk into a cow, if the injection site swells at all they kill the cow.
Just the imprecision of the test alone of how it is measured is noted. But the true scam lies in monumentally stupid assumption that somehow puncturing the skin and injecting a foreign agent *shouldn't* injure.
Really they are taking the most healthy cattle and slaughtering them.
With 1 in 4 healthy people testing positive for TB, this scam is not getting any better with PCR tests either.

Can’t imagine the suits were too happy with that revealing moment or maybe they knew all about it in advance, which is more likely. Clarkson will probably be pushing a bTB jab for cows next that avoids the nasty test. It’s hard not to be cynical when there’s money involved. In the eyes of his fans, Jeremy Clarkson can do no wrong. He’s their pal. Trust levels are high. They’ve been through so much together over the years. In the season finale of Clarkson’s Farm we find out that according to the cow’s post mortem, the animal never actually had bovine tuberculosis (bTB). “They’ve killed my pregnant cow for no reason,” he says in the penultimate scene. “You know that expression, ‘my blood is boiling’?”

Whatever about the poor unfortunate cow, how many humans have been killed and will be put down because of some dodgy test that misdiagnoses them before they’re subjected to a raft of Big Pharma assaults in the name of healthcare? Is this some kind of weird revelation of method performance being played out for our entertainment?

Clarkson being forced to cull his firstborn calf on the farm along with its mother has creepy undertones of a very public sacrifice. You can’t help thinking, ‘What’s the exchange?’ It’s impossible not to go there with everything we’ve learned over the past few years about secret societies and how they operate.

Clarkson is being hailed a hero following his call for men to get tested for prostate cancer, even encouraging them to lie to their GPs. It saw a surge of 640% of men contacting their doctors to get checked. How many of them will be sent forward on unnecessary cancer journeys for Big Pharma profit? Clarkson holds great power among the British public and in Big Pharma circles. He’s very useful.

Interestingly, he waited until the final episode of the show’s fifth series to reveal he was being treated for prostate cancer. This meant he kept the news a secret for more than a year after being diagnosed in May 2025.

Maybe Clarkson will quit farming after winning the hearts of so many with his cow poop and scoop antics on Diddly Squat Farm. There’s a new campaign on X promoting him as some kind of patron saint of Britain, the ultimate legend. What dangerous Big Pharma product will he promote next and for how much? Best we can do is to keep reminding people of the true cost of these paid advertisements and hope they’ll start to understand why it’s a bad idea to put their faith in false idols. Clarkson may be witty and outrageous but he comes with a price.

Related articles:

Senior Clinician on AstraZeneca’s Trial Management Team Dies Suddenly

VOGUE WILLIAMS, ASTRAZENECA, BLOOD CLOTS AND THE DRIVE TO PUSH 400,000 UNUSED DOSES ON YOUNG IRISH PEOPLE

Compensated $6.5 million for his Covid jab injuries, Melbourne man Chris Nemeth says he’d give it all back if he could have his former health

‘No evidence of any kind it’s causing blood clots’ - Professor Luke O’Neill on the AstraZeneca jab, March 15, 2021

How much was Clarkson paid to promote the AstraZeneca shots? You can be sure he didn’t put this ad out for free on X or offer his participation voluntarily in The Sun newspaper’s ridiculous Jabs Army campaign to get as many unsuspecting readers injected as fast as possible. Is Clarkson being paid now to generate cancer anxiety to ensure more Big Pharma clients while he retains his position as lovable uncle of Britain who says it like it is. It’s all highly suspicious, especially his call to his audience to lie to their GPs in order to get tested for prostate cancer. Any TV presenter, no matter how beloved, no matter how endearing, who profited from pushing the Covid shots should be viewed as untrustworthy at best, a traitor at worst. It’s a terrible sign of character, someone who’s willing to put lives in danger as long as he lines his own pocket. We’ve seen it over and over again throughout the Covid scam. The love of money really is the root of all evil.

Now we’re supposed to believe that Jeremy Clarkson has prostate cancer and that it’s under control because he got tested early. It’s easy to say that Clarkson got cancer or heart issues (previously) because of the toxic shots he promoted but that’s presuming he really did roll up his sleeve to take on the scary unidentifiable virus. There’s a high chance he only pretended to get injected like so many other celebrities and influencers who took money to promote the injections for everyone else, not them.

Personally I don’t believe Jeremy Clarkson was daft enough to get injected. I don’t believe his schtick about caring for the nation’s wellbeing. I don’t believe his astonishment at the AstraZeneca Covid shot taking only nine months to get to market. Subtract money from the equation and you can be certain there’d be no amazement at the wonders of The $cience™. Without money there’d be no fake pandemic. It was all based on greed disguised as caring.

Even if Clarkson is genuinely recovering from cancer - it’s hard to know with professional performers - the fact that his promotion of toxic injections that have destroyed so many lives makes it difficult to have too much sympathy. Think of all the young people whose health has been ruined by the AstraZeneca shots, all the children left without a mother or a father, all the unnecessary disabilities and tears never recorded for the cameras. That’s a heavy weight on the soul.

We had a similar hard sell of the AstraZeneca shots in Ireland by Professor Luke O’Neill of Trinity College Dublin. The complicit mainstream media will not hold him to account. They’ve been paid off too, just like nearly everyone else in this corrupted landscape of lies heaped upon more lies for the common good.

In our discussion, Dr McConville helps breakdown a French study comprising 28 million people which claims the Covid shots were not only safe and effective but helped to lower all cause mortality. A wonder injection in other words. What excess deaths? Dr McConville explains how the data was manipulated to secure a positive outcome.

Having an unafraid medical voice interrupt the programming in this way is invaluable at this critical juncture in our history. That’s why he was up before a fitness-to-practise hearing of the Irish Medical Council recently for tweets that undermined public health policy during the Covid scam. In other words Dr McConville dared to point out some of the inconsistencies and anomalies.

Intercepting falsehoods is massively important in this spiritual war. Don’t let those lies fester. We all have a role to play in that regard. Each and every one of us no matter how big or small those interruptions seem. They are powerful.

Dr McConville’s has written a book that serves to upset the propaganda surrounding the Covid scam as he methodically lays out why the health scare was created to bring mRNA nanotechnology to a wider market, by any means necessary.

You can purchase the book HERE.

Full interview with Dr Mick McConville:

You can find Dr McConville on X @reasonoverfear

We’ve got another striking example of misdirection from those phoney false flag investigators I’ve been warning you about on this Substack for some time. Phoney as opposed to genuine false flag investigators who use trustworthy methodology to establish facts to support their theses in an open and fair manner. You can spot the phoney ones because they use deception, suggestion and manipulation to con their audience into the wrong conclusion. They can display wicked traits behind a veneer of respectability and pious Christianity. The aim of the game is to make those critical thinkers who fall for their chicanery look mad and bad in front of their peers. All the hallmarks of counterintelligence.

Think Richard D Hall comparing the aftermath of the Omagh bombing to the aftermath of the Manchester Arena bombing in order to deceive his audience into reaching the absurd ‘no bomb, no victims’ conclusion that was plastered all over the mainstream media. Two completely different bombs, two completely different outcomes but that didn’t stop intrepid investigative journalist Richard D Hall from using the image of the Omagh bomb carnage to suggest to his audience that the Manchester Arena should have looked similar after the explosion that never was according to him. Misleading. Suggestive. Wrong.

Another Richard D Hall associate in Ireland, so-called investigative journalist Gemma O’Doherty (who’s constantly contradicting herself, another sign of deception) did everything in her power to shut down any discussion surrounding the stabbing of three children and school worker Leanne Flynn in Dublin’s Parnell Square on November 23, 2023. She used manipulation and deceptive tactics to convince her viewers it was all staged and that nobody had been injured in the attack. She dismissed video footage of an injured child being attended to on the pavement while accusing eye-witness Anto Boyle of being a crisis actor. I too was accused of being a crisis actor for merely interviewing Anto Boyle about what he saw that day. Asking questions was enough to attract the angry mob. They didn’t want questions. It was all staged as far as they were concerned. No further analysis necessary.

‘Michael’ Freepress joined the ‘Fake!’ chorus. At one point he suggested that the children might have been harmed elsewhere and then transported to the scene. Readers gave him the thumbs up in their droves. Instead of allowing space for the concept that the Irish government had given refuge and citizenship to a man capable of the attempted murder of schoolchildren, the truther community were being corralled into reaching a false conclusion - that the whole thing was faked. They were led to believe that the stabbings were some kind of big performance and that all involved were part of an ostentatious daylight production team. The kind of travelling circus that Ole Dammegard had spoken of on Delingpole, who’d also pushed the ‘no bomb, no victims’ line on Manchester with a Cheshire cat grin.

Now that the trial of Algerian man Riad Bouchaker is underway in Dublin, it’s become abundantly clear the attempted murder of the schoolchildren was very real. There was no such production company in town that day in November 2023. It’s preposterous to conceive that everyone involved was a crisis actor or crew member. Those who fell for the staged scenario got it wrong and now they look mad and bad in front of their peers. See how it works. The authorities wanted to take the heat out of the immigrant crime and so did counterintelligence. They succeeded. The spotlight shifted to the Dublin riots and the critical thinkers dismissed the attack on the children as staged and moved along to the next big thing as if they’d solved the mystery.

Those who joined the chorus early should have observed who was promoting the line that it was staged. They should have noticed the desperation in pushing just one conclusion, mercilessly. Anyone genuinely seeking answers opens the floor to many alternative options. It’s easy to say there was no blood at the scene from the comfort of a sofa. An honest assessment would require getting down there to examine the area close-up and question eye-witnesses. There’s a big difference. Sofa journalism generally leads to mistakes, assumptions and misdirection.

Just like with the ‘no bomb, no victims’ phoney conclusion with the Manchester Arena attack - innocent people get picked on, falsely accused of being crisis actors then mocked by the online faceless mob who believe they’re perfectly entitled to attack victims en masse. Hibbert the Fibbert for example. It’s a pile-on. When he complains of being harassed, it’s another pile-on.

Gemma O’Doherty made a video encouraging her viewers to ridicule Siobhán Kearney, the sister of a Stardust nightclub fire victim, just because she used the word Hubbabulluva to describe the scene outside the school in Dublin. Siobhán Kearney was on a break from an inquest into her brother Liam Dunne’s death when she confronted Riad Bouchaker as he was attempting to kill the children (allegedly), jumping on him and even managing to kick the knife away. Hubbabulluva was enough to convict her in the court of Gemma O’Doherty and her goon squad.

Instead of giving this woman - who has already suffered enough from losing her brother - any kind of empathy, O’Doherty got her followers to mock her valiant attempts at disarming a man trying to stab little ones. Manipulating followers to turn on victims is really dark territory. Satanic, in my view. The bulk of O’Doherty’s viewers are sure everyone involved is a crisis actor so they don’t feel bad about their actions or words. They appear to feel fully vindicated, if their comments are anything to go by. An award-winning investigative journalist has given them the scoop after all. They’ve got the inside track. They’re awake. The sheeple don’t understand. The normies haven’t worked it out yet.

This is why vigilance is required in these matters no matter how compelling the argument presented to us. Most of us have fallen for these tricks at some point or another and probably will again. There’s no shame in it as we attempt to figure out this new terrain where children appear to be the target. Mistakes most definitely will be made. Still. A GoFundMe drive doesn’t necessarily equate to payment for a crisis actor gig. It may or may not be the reason behind its launch. We can’t jump to conclusions. Assume nothing. Sometimes people just want to show support or say thank you. There are other options that can’t be overlooked if you’re genuinely seeking answers. Sometimes the answers don’t come easily. Sometimes you have to wait and see.

In a time of great deception, of course we’re going to continue to ask questions and doubt the official narrative or even the alternative narrative. There are traps laid everywhere. We still haven’t got to the bottom of the Parnell Square stabbings but there’s no way all these people are lying about what occurred that day even if Riad Bouchaker denies the charges. The late Jeff Gallagher was right in his assessment of the child’s condition in hospital. It’s a miracle she’s still alive after weeks in intensive care having suffered severe brain damage as a result of the stabbings. She’s now wheelchair bound and communicates by blinking. Grant it, we haven’t seen the little girl but that’s deliberate. She’s been kept out of view on purpose.

Look at what happened to the victims of the Manchester Arena bombing when they went public. They were accused of all sorts. Richard D Hall made out the parents of eight-year-old victim Saffie Roussos had used the bombing (that never was according to him) as a cover for an earlier incident where they were involved in her death. That’s not ok. James Delingpole backed him up. Laughed at her death as if it was a joke. His audience felt entitled to laugh along because they were fully convinced she was just a crisis actor, that the whole family were just making it up. No wonder Delingpole isn’t up for any online bickering as he hides behind the Psalms, his latest Substack entitled ‘Don’t feed the demons’. Indeed.

There’s too much misdirection to ignore in these circles. Debate, discussion and analysis are necessary to sift through the information, to discard the dross and pinpoint the aspects worth investigating. Who cares if it causes division? Good. Anyone who has attached themselves to the ‘no bomb, no victims’ line with the Manchester Arena bombing has only helped to destroy their own reputations with friends and family. They must take responsibility for that. Anyone who’s said Parnell Square was all theatre has done a similar act of self-sabotage. Best hang back and assess slowly.

We’re never all going to agree on everything, that’s fine but there are those amongst us deliberately putting out dodgy information in order to encourage a false conclusion. That’s been proven with the Manchester Arena ‘no bomb, no victims’ conclusion and the Parnell Square ‘no victims’ conclusion. Both misleading. On the surface, it looked like honest false flag analysis but dig a bit deeper and you get misdirection. The tell tale signs were there all along. We have to get better at spotting them earlier for fear of falling foul of counterintelligence skulduggery.

Related articles:

It’s time to acknowledge the false flag deception is a well funded psy-op designed to mislead and undermine

Oh look! There’s RDH telling James Delingpole about his Saffie Roussos theory!

I tell her that in my research for this interview, I found it hard to find any major interviews after 2019.

Sunday Independent journalist Liadán Hynes on Mairéad Ronan

Why would Sunday Independent journalist Liadán Hynes write such a thing? A quick Google search delivers an array of media interactions with Mairéad Ronan, best known for her role on Ray D’Arcy’s radio show on Today FM (2000-2014). Most prominent among those media appearances, two studio interviews on Virgin Media’s The Six O’Clock Show which went out to a national audience, the first on March 9, 2021, the second on March 15, 2022.

It’s nearly like Liadán Hynes is purposefully ignoring these television interviews in an attempt to tidy up the past. Like in George Orwell’s dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, the memory hole refers to a small chute connected to an incinerator where the ruling party systematically destroys inconvenient or contradictory documents.

The cover story from Life magazine which comes with The Sunday Independent newspaper, offers us Mairéad Ronan anew. We’re supposed to believe she opted out of the spotlight because she wanted to spend time with the children, rather than spend some of that newly acquired dosh from the Covid testing enterprise her husband ran with his father in Co. Kildare. There’s no mention of the holiday home revamp in Co Waterford that got the go ahead despite local opposition. It doesn’t fit with the sob sorry narrative. It’s too hard to pull at heart strings when there’s a big budget construction in the way.

The Life magazine puff piece doesn’t mention Enfer or how former Chief Medical Officer Dr Tony Holohan ended up as the chair of the medical advisory board for the company. Too many conflicts of interest to ignore. Even the Irish Medical Times picked up on the stench of ‘jobs for the boys’.

There’s no talk of numbers in the Life article, just fawning complicity.

We don’t know the exact amount Enfer made from processing Covid tests but we can deduce from Internet scrapings:

The Health Service Executive (HSE) paid the Tipperary-based company Enfer Medical €122.4 million to process Covid-19 tests in 2020, with total state contracts for their services ultimately heading toward €200 million.

The exact profit Enfer generated from these payments is not publicly disclosed because it re-registered as an unlimited company over a decade ago. However, the scope of their testing yielded notable payouts for individuals, including an €800,000 dividend paid to a former state scientist who joined the company.

Operating on a 24/7 basis, Enfer Medical became the largest COVID-19 testing laboratory in Ireland. Throughout the pandemic, the facility processed over 5 million patient samples for the HSE.

Instead of playing a tiny violin for Mairead Ronan in an effort to elicit sympathy, Liadán Hynes should have asked her subject about the conflict of interest of appearing on national television claiming she and the whole family had ‘Covid’ along with the dog. How did they know they had the illness if symptoms weren’t necessary? Did her husband’s business process the tests? Which kits did they use to discover they were ill? The interviewer also needed to ask about her husband making so much money from testing for the mystery virus while his wife claimed to have the thing that had replaced the flu. Basic journalism. Elephant in the room stuff. Not hard.

Instead we get this slop:

“…with Louis I am sure, sure, sure. He is the thing I’m most sure of in my life, him and our relationship.”

That’s nice but what about the conflicts of interest? Mairéad Ronan didn’t look ‘wrecked’ at all on The Six O’Clock Show after her ‘battle’ with Covid. In fact, she appeared positively giddy about the whole episode, like she’d won the lottery.

The Life magazine advertorial informs us she’s back with Ray D’Arcy for a new podcast which can only survive if the audience continues to overlook these awkward bits and agrees to the memory holing process.

They’ll have to acquiesce to George Orwell’s doublethink concept from Nineteen Eighty-Four, the ability to simultaneously hold two contradictory beliefs in one's mind and accept both of them as true. It involves the act of deliberately forgetting any fact that becomes inconvenient, and then knowing it again when it is needed.

We’re here. It’s happening.

Barely anyone notices the contradictions or if they do, they don’t say them aloud. The majority get cross with you for noticing. They want to play along with the charade. The truth is too inconvenient.

"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past."

Another George Orwell nugget to chew on. We have an opportunity to seize the narrative and to reject these totalitarian advances dressed up as friendly interplays.

Who is in control of the past? Who is in control of the present? The mainstream media? Or those of us who demand better standards in public life and who are willing to stand in the way of the machine?

The longer we leave it, the harder it will be to disagree, as the protagonists in Nineteen Eight-Four discovered to their detriment.

Related articles:

CRINGE TV: Mairead Ronan - whose husband made millions from testing kits - giddily talks about her battle with ‘Covid’

Mairead Ronan’s funny money

RTÉ presenters including Ray D’Arcy listen to cancer stories while failing to ask obvious questions about the trial Covid-19 injections and their link to the disease...

Why are the mainstream media and alternative news sources not telling us about Stephen Ogilvie’s 161 previous convictions? It’s a bit of an omission. Of course that doesn’t mean he deserved to get his eye gouged out or his head partially hacked off by a Sudanese migrant, allegedly. These details are simply part of the usual news gathering processes that you’d expect from reporters. These details are usually released straight away, not sat on, not hidden, not buried. It’s like the agenda is to keep the violence going in Belfast. If the thugs burning the place down and terrorising neighbourhoods understood that Stephen Ogilvie is not exactly the ‘vulnerable’ man he’s being portrayed as in the media, they might think twice before throwing that Molotov cocktail at the cops or smashing in those windows. They might take off the balaclavas and go home.

In April 2020, Newsletter reports:

A Belfast man allegedly assaulted a stroke victim within hours of her release from hospital, a court heard.

Stephen Ogilvie is accused of slapping the woman and splitting her partner’s lip after being asked to leave their neighbouring home.

The 37-year-old, of Avoca Street in the north of the city, denies any attack on the couple.

He appeared before Belfast Magistrates’ Court to face charges of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and common assault.

But District Judge Fiona Bagnall rejected suggestions that he could be released if an alternative address is found.

Denying bail, she said: “I think there’s a strong likelihood of re-offending, and I’m very concerned about the capacity of Mr Ogilvie to comply with any conditions.”

The accused was remanded in custody, to appear again in four weeks time.

This Belfast Live article from August 7, 2020, tells us:

A man allegedly wrecked a Covid-19 protective screen in his local garage and then “kicked off” when police arrived, a court heard today.

Stephen Ogilvie is accused of targeting officers during the disturbance in North Belfast on his birthday. The 38-year-old, of Avoca Street in the city, is charged with criminal damage, disorderly behaviour, assaulting one PSNI constable and attempting to assault a second.

Ogilvie was arrested following the alleged incident at a garage on the Crumlin Road on Monday night. A PSNI officer told Belfast Magistrates’ Court: “He went into the filling station, punched a Covid protection screen in the store and destroyed it. Then he kicked off at police.”

Ogilvie was said to have made full admissions during interviews. District Judge Fiona Bagnall noted that he has 161 previous convictions. “You weigh this record, you don’t read it,” she remarked.

At this point I think it’s fair to surmise that Stephen Ogilvie is most likely not a crisis actor. Surely Central Casting would have picked someone that the public would sympathise with, not recoil from in horror. Sounds like his life was dogged in criminality right up to the point where a Sudanese migrant, 30-year-old Hadi Alodid, straddled his shoulders while he lay in the middle of the road on a North Belfast street at 10.30pm and attempted to hack his head off. This was before the Sudanese man was whacked over the head repeatedly by a man with a hurl, all caught on camera. It’s sill unclear why the men were fighting in the first place. There are rumours it was over drugs but that’s unconfirmed.

It’s telling that the Irish Sun newspaper chose to overlook Stephen Ogilvie’s past crimes and focus on his victimhood in this report from June 10, 2026.

The report reads:

A MAN who was attacked in a suspected attempted beheading in Belfast was previously tortured at a flat in Scotland.

Stephen Ogilvie, 44, was allegedly set upon by Sudanese asylum seeker Hadi Alodid on Monday night.

It is understood that he suffered “significant injuries” following the alleged blade attack.

Mr Ogilvie, who was born in Northern Ireland and previously moved to Scotland, was attacked at a property in Livingston in 2001.

At the time, he was staying with drug dealer David McLeave.

The brute, then aged 21, gave Mr Ogilvie the date rape drug GBH and placed a lit cigarette between his toes.

McLeave then removed Mr Ogilvie’s clothes, before dousing him in aftershave and setting him alight.

The victim woke up to find his head and groin on fire and the sickening incident was recorded on video.

After fleeing back to his homeland, Mr Ogilvie later told authorities that he feared for his life after he was forced into a car by McLeave’s associates Barry and Paul Campbell.

The thug was caged for 14 years in April 2003 at the High Court in Edinburgh.

His accomplices Paul Campbell, then aged 20, Thomas Irvine, 21, Edward Lindsay, 23, and Lee Kingham, 21, were jailed for drug offences.

Barry Campbell, then aged 21, was also sentenced to six years in prison for his part in abducting Mr Ogilvie and possessing a rifle without a license.

The criminal gang claimed to be linked to the Belfast wing of the Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF), a loyalist paramilitary organisation.

At the time, Lord Hardie said the case highlighted “the evil associated with the trade in controlled drugs”.

He told the court: “The lives of many people were adversely affected by the actions of this gang from Northern Ireland who sought to try and control the drug trade in the Calders area of Edinburgh and, to do so, took over the lives and homes of the people who lived there.”

Mr Ogilvie lost his left eye in the street horror on Monday evening.

He also suffered severe damage to his right eye as well as injuries to his neck and back.

Alodid has been detained after appearing at court charged with attempted murder, possession of an article with a blade in a public place and threats to kill.

The incident led to widespread protests and in Glasgow city centre a demonstration sparked unrest.

Three men, two aged 18 and one 31-year-old, were charged after five people were injured, including two cops.

It all makes for grim reading. Stephen Ogilvie was in the company of some really dark and dangerous people and with his own 161 previous convictions was not in a good place by the time of the attempted beheading.

We know the Zionist Epstein predator class plan is to have us fight, fight, fight as they sit back and laugh.

Elon Musk tweeted on June 9, 2026: ‘That’s what it comes down to’. He attached this ominous message to an earlier recording from September 2025 when he told Tommy Robinson at a monster London rally that ‘You either fight back or you die’. Really? I don’t think so. The post comes as IDF favourite Stephen Yaxley-Lennon aka Tommy Robinson met with Elon Musk’s Dad Errol in Moscow. You don’t have to be a top detective to figure out there’s foreign influence behind these riots in Belfast that go way beyond the attempted beheading of Stephen Ogilvie.

It’s safe to say at this point we’re being played by people with a satanic agenda and we’d better use our Christian discernment to avoid the pitfalls of believing their propaganda, whether the attack was real or fake.

The guy who came to the rescue with the hurley stick is known as Maitiu Mág Tighearnán on X or Matt. You’d have to wonder if the hurl, a symbol of Irish nationalism, was used as some kind of a prop to unite Catholics and Protestants against the newcomers. Was it premeditated somehow?

“So what I’ll be doing is anything that comes my way with the creator fees will be halved” - Maitiu Mág Tighearnán

This video was posted on X by Matt on June 10, 2026. What does Matt mean by ‘creator fees’? He wrote:

Quick video update and creator fee’s

Still getting use to take videos and that also so allow me being a wreck

Last count, there was nearly £30,000 raised for Matt on GoFundMe. No good deed can go unpaid for these days. A dangerous game.

Since the release of the video, Belfast is looking more like a war zone by the day, a sorry state of affairs. The Troubles brewing again. It’s not good for tourism, not good for business, not good for anyone except those with a hidden agenda of control and manipulation.

Political commentator Jeff Peel reminds us of M15 spook operations and how they’ve wreaked havoc in the region for decades. Let’s not forget.

We must ask ourselves why are the mainstream media and the alternative media ignoring these important details about Stephen Ogilvie’s backstory?

It’s not as if they don’t know, his criminal past is on the record. Looks like they’re choosing to leave out these details to elicit maximum sympathy for Stephen Ogilvie while stirring up racial tensions to keep the fight going.

The Zionist lobby in Ireland, many of whom have won favour during the Covid scam are playing their part in cranking up the fear factor and banging the war drum.

All of this must be observed with a cold eye and cool head.

If we know the end game, we’re less likely to get swept up in the trickery.

Just looking at the mess left behind by the thugs in Belfast it’s clear that violence is not the answer. The wrong people get picked on. The paramilitaries/MI5 run amok.

Tommy Robinson isn’t the answer.

Elon Musk isn’t the answer.

Let’s not fight, fight, fight.

Let’s think, think, think and pray, pray, pray.

Related article:

What’s real and what’s fake? Jeff Peel on social media manipulation and questionable agendas

It's hard to know who or what to trust these days with so many competing online agendas begging for attention and a mainstream media that can’t stop lying. We break down some of the stories of the moment in an attempt to figure out the aim of the game.

Note: A few details have shifted since our conversation earlier today including the timing of the attack. News reports say it was 22.30 (not 02.00) and that the accused man is Sudanese, not Somali.

As ever, author and political commentator Jeff Peel offers his insights with care and caution.

You can find Jeff on X HERE.

The article under which these comments appeared is titled: The Maddest court case ever by Nick Kollerstrom, published May 22, 2026. It churns out the usual conspiratainment non-evidence on the bombing, dismissing the victims as crisis actors while priming the way for yet another fundraiser for poor, persecuted Richard D Hall who was only trying to get the troof out with his ‘no bomb, no victims’ conclusion.

Kollerstrom repeats the lie that wheelchair bound victim of the blast Martin Hibbert is an actor despite my series of articles and videos exposing the misdirection with the furore that followed including a string of writings attempting to disprove my stance that the victims are genuine. Despite the reams and reams of analysis, nothing could prove they were faking their injuries or that the dead weren’t actually dead or even that they didn’t die in a bomb blast in the Manchester Arena on May 22, 2017.

Here’s David A. Hughes flashing devil horns during an interview with Iain Davis and Maryann Gebauer on April 17, 2025. Inverted commas, allegedly. The borefest goes on for more than three hours. Lots of blah, blah, blah but no concrete evidence as per usual.

It’s also odd that Iain Davis would choose a blood spattered smiley face as the symbol for his website. Not exactly appropriate in this dark climate of evildoing, is it? Plain weird.

It seems to be critically important for the secret societies running the intelligence agencies that conspiracy theorists believe there was no bomb and no victims on the night. It’s already worked exceptionally well as a means to undermine critical thinkers publicly. The only reason Richard D Hall’s court case was widely covered in the mainstream media is because his conclusion is wrong. If he was right, it would have been ignored. The spotlight would have steered clear. All of those who agreed with Richard D Hall’s ‘no bomb, no victims’ stance now look stupid and untrustworthy in front of their peers. They’re also picking on a father in a wheelchair and his daughter who’s also in a wheelchair. Not great. Most feel perfectly entitled to mock Martin Hibbert and his daughter Eve and the other victims of the blast because they’ve been emboldened by this apparent investigative journalism, engineered by an easily identifiable network all backing each other up.

Iain Davis is usually not shy about coming forward but he’s gone quiet on this subject despite being active on X.

And again.

Iain Davis wrote a book The Manchester Attck: An Independent Investigation ignoring the victims, something unheard of in journalistic terms, a stunning omission. He dismissed my concerns that his approach could lead to the wrong conclusion during our interview, September 10, 2024. The audience seemed to think leaving out the victims was perfectly fine too, which was troubling to say the least.

It would be good to get some clarification on what’s going on considering we’ve been so public about this debate over the years. Iain’s book is currently unavailable on Amazon. It appears to be still available to buy on his website but the sale won’t go through on Paypal. Has his book been removed from circulation or is it just out of stock?

If it is the case that the families of the deceased have been in touch to put a halt to the book’s distribution, this puts Iain Davis in a bit of a predicament. He ignored the victims because he deemed them irrelevant to the story. A terrible idea as I tried to warn him in September 2024 but he followed in the footsteps of Richard D Hall’s unreliable evidence. Madness! It didn’t make any sense and still doesn’t to this day.

All those pushing the ‘no bomb, no victims’ line on the Manchester Arena bombing must be looked at with suspicion. Either they’ve believed the worst kind of evidence through naivety and groupthink or they’ve actively been trying to hoodwink people into a false conclusion for nefarious purposes. Yes it’s that stark.

This is where David A. Hughes and Iain Davis’ ‘no bomb, no victims’ theory falls to pieces. They can’t explain the deaths or injuries from the night. If there was no bomb, what killed and injured all the people? Also none of the families have backed up their claims. Why do people insist on believing absurdities? Is it because it comes out of the mouths of people they deem to be experts?

I first thought Iain Davis might have just been naive, that he considered Richard D Hall to be a real investigative journalist and blindly bought into his ‘no bomb, no victims’ nonsense but I’m beginning to reassess that presumption. There’s more to it than that. Intellectual dishonesty. He’s playing dumb. Just like David A. Hughes. The whole thing stinks. We need an update from these two. Clarification required.

As for the others who’ve promoted the ‘no bomb, no victims’ line, they need to explain themselves. It’s all looking very dodgy. That’s why the Manchester Arena bombing story remains an excellent filter to figure out who’s who on the Resistance side. If you’ve been conned into believing there was no bomb and no victims that night or if you’ve thrown money into one of Richard D Hall’s black holes, maybe it’s time to reassess or at least pause for thought.

Last month marked the ninth anniversary of the attack on concert goers to the Manchester Arena. Even the victims’ families are still asking questions about what happened that night. Many of them don’t buy the official version of events either. They say MI5 are lying. There’s always room for further investigation when treated honestly. It’s the dishonest methods you have to watch out for lest you fall for a misleading conclusion and end up picking on the wrong people.

Perhaps Iain Davis is finally figuring out why it was a terrible idea to ignore the victims.

Related articles:

Evil: Richard D Hall and Genevieve Lewis Accuse Grieving Mother of Lying and of Covering Up the Death of her Child

Suspicious behaviour: James Delingpole pretends he’s unaware of RDH’s Saffie Roussos theory

The Iain Davis Interview on the Manchester Arena Bombing

There was no need for any injections, old or young. There was no pandemic, only shenanigans, fake sincerity and lots of highly paid for propaganda. The excess deaths since the injections the IMC told the public were safe and effective, prove the Covid jabs were toxic. There’s simply too much evidence in the public domain exposing the fraud for the charges against Ireland’s persecuted doctors to stand. The IMC are relying on public ignorance and a complicit mainstream media to protect their status and act as a cover. Their position is no longer tenable. Best they can do at this point is deflect and pretend the good guys are the bad guys. They’re buying time.

The editorial staff at the Irish Times, the apparent paper of record, are also concealing their tracks on the Covid scam and predictably chose the least flattering photo of Dr De Brun for their coverage of the hearing. Beats the stock shot of a stethoscope as produced for retired GP Dr Michael McConville who was up before the IMC last week for daring to expose the medical fraud of the Covid era.

Dr De Brun was back on X (formerly Twitter) today, defiant as ever:

MISINFORMATION"
Throughout the course of 6yrs of investigations and 7 days of hearings and cross examinations by the IMC's legal team. I was NEVER accused of misinformation. Not ONCE. I don't think the word was ever even used!

Here’s a reminder of The $cience™ according to the Irish Times when columnist and broadcaster Seán Moncrieff had to deal with a guy on the DART train who wasn’t wearing a mask, somebody who could see the whole thing was a sham so had to be shamed publicly.

As ever it’s up to the public to decide if they want to continue to trust The $cience™ and protect the lies of the machine, ignore the excess deaths and pretend the increase in cancers, clots and sudden deaths are all perfectly normal. Or they can finally decide to be honest and acknowledge the extra deaths since the injections and start to correct course as matter of urgency.

As always, it’s a choice.

Play dumb or get smart.

Read the full transcript of Dr Marcus De Brun’s final submission to the Irish Medical Council at his Fitness-to-Practise hearing, the Talbot Stillorgan hotel, June 4, 2026.

Thank you very much, Chair. Just two points before I make my submission. Just this notion that the CEO has suggested that I stand over my tweets;

I think that the Committee and people here should have the benefit of a bit of explanation or expansion on that notion, because it is quite a damning notion to think that a doctor might suggest or feel and stand over the notion that a mother bringing her child to be vaccinated is guilty of child abuse. That’s certainly not something that I stand over.

Whilst I don’t -- I don’t stand over perhaps the tone or the robust nature of the point being made, it is the sentiment of the tweet that I stand over. And for the CEO to suggest that that’s something that I stand over is somewhat of a disingenuous portrayal of me, not just as a physician, but as a human being. Twitter or X or whatever it is, it is like a football match; if I was to start screaming and shouting in here in this room, well, that would be inappropriate for me. But if I shout at a football match, that’s not inappropriate.

And why is that? It is because context.

So, the context of a tweet, and if the language is forceful or engaging or upsetting to people, well, the subject matter is Irish children, and I am a father as well as a doctor --

(APPLAUSE FROM MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC)

So my point being is a simple one; clearly the context of where a statement is made, or even to be called a statement, or where a point is being made, and how it is being made are very, very important facts here that seem to have been overlooked in the CEO’s assertion that Dr. De Brun stands over his tweets.

Once again I reiterate, I stand over the sentiment. I have two small children and two grown children, two adult children, and my two adult children took the Covid vaccine, and my wife took the Covid vaccine. So, to say that I stand over those statements is a grossly unfair characterisation of me. I am a father, I am a doctor and I am also a human being. And I certainly would not suggest in a different forum, perhaps, or in a different way, perhaps, and certainly not in a consultation with a patient or that, I certainly wouldn’t call somebody who brings their child to get a Covid vaccine guilty of child abuse. But there is a point being made, and the point is being made in strong language to exercise the hope that people will start thinking, is there something grossly wrong here? And I remain utterly convinced that those vaccines in respect of children are grossly wrong. So I think context is important.

The second point that I would make; the CEO has just reiterated that I left that public rally and I returned to my practice, and that somehow that this has been constructed to reflect some disregard for my patients. I take umbrage at that assertion, because I was at the rally on behalf of my patients, on behalf of my patients who had died, died in the nursing homes as a consequence of government policy, of neglect. That’s why I was there. So I wasn’t there -- I didn’t return to my practice two days later. I am a physician, I know if I am sick, if I am developing Covid symptoms, if I get a temperature, I know how to behave, and the guidelines apply to me as they apply to everyone else in that regard. So the question really is, is did I -would I have brought, if I had a cold, or if I had symptoms that I was expressing coronavirus, would I have recklessly brought that into my practice and introduced it to my elderly vulnerable patients? I resent that. That’s - it is a disingenuous assertion and it makes little of my education, it makes little of my - it makes little of my humanity, never mind my intelligence. So, I would like to make those two points quite clear. And certainly had I had symptoms after I had attended the rally, or I had thought myself, or ever considered myself to be a risk to my vulnerable patients, I would act accordingly.

I had no intention of making a submission in respect of sanction until those two points were raised, but I did go to the trouble of writing something last night, and I will read it into the record, and it is three or four pages, and then I will finish, because it touches on some of the points that have been raised.

In February 2020, I had my own GP practice in north Dublin. I was also responsible for the care of a nursing home with some 50 elderly residents.

In February and March of 2020, although I followed HSE guidelines, and those issued to me by the Irish College of General Practice, many elderly residents at my nursing home began to die at an alarming rate, and I cared for them as they died.

I broke the news to family members, many of whom stood outside in the rain and the cold and observed what was unfolding through the windows, because they couldn’t get in to see their family members. And I was responsible, I was the agent of the State who was to exercise these policies, and many of these policies were wrong, fundamentally wrong, but I adhered to them and I followed them.

At the time I was a member of the Irish Medical Council. And throughout my medical career, I have always respected the public health guidance and the Medical Council, and I believed that institutions like the Medical Council were here for the public good, that they’re recommendations and guidelines exist to protect patients and promote public health. That’s what I believed, and that’s why I followed the guidelines at my nursing home, and my patients were dying.

In February 2020, the guidance I was issued in respect of my nursing home residents instructed me not to test them for Covid-19. And indeed if I requested a test from the HSE, I was told that if they had symptoms, I was to presume that everybody had Covid-19, and I wasn’t allowed to test patients, because a wave of Covid was expected in the hospital sector and in the general public and tests were not to be wasted on nursing home residents, they had to be preserved for members of the public. Well, I knew that policy was wrong, because we were testing people who weren’t vulnerable, it was the elderly who were vulnerable. I was instructed by the HSE that if one resident at my facility had Covid-19 that no more testing would be provided, and I was to assume that they all had it, and testing was the only manner that I had to isolate the vulnerable, to protect the vulnerable within the care home facility, but that was pulled in February of 2020.

In March and February, these policies were instituted in anticipation of a wave that never arrived, and in March of that year some 15 patients were transferred from the hospital, from Beaumont Hospital over the course of a weekend were transferred into my nursing home. And I arrived for work on Monday morning to do a ward round at the nursing home, and I was informed by nursing staff that there were some 12 or 15 patients there from Beaumont Hospital that nobody told me about, nobody negotiated. And what’s more, they hadn’t even been tested.

And when I called the HSE to request testing, again I was told to assume that they all had it, or organise testing myself. This was the regard that was given to the vulnerable people in our society. These were the guidelines that I was following, I was adhering to, because I had faith, I had faith in the medical establishment, I had faith in the HSE, and I had faith in the Medical Council, which I was a member of. I had faith in the regulatory authority, so I followed those guidelines. I was advised by my colleagues at the Irish College of General Practice to contact family members of the elderly nursing home residents under my care, and to encourage them to sign “do not resuscitate orders”, so that their elderly relatives might not be transferred to the hospital and become a burden. I repeat “a burden”. That’s what my patients were. That’s what the elderly in the nursing home sector in Ireland were, they were a burden.

The only treatment that I was advised to give those elderly residents who were dying was end-of-life care, midazolam for sedation and palliation, whilst at the same time, at the same time in the hospitals, my colleagues were instructed, the consultants were instructed to treat patients with steroids and anti-inflammatories and antibiotics and hydroxychloroquine, all of this I made abundantly clear through my hearing, and it is on the record for this Committee.

But no treatments were encouraged or permitted within the community setting where nursing home patients, nursing home residents reside. We were not even encouraged to administer vitamin D, not even natural sunlight, because they were locked indoors. Why is that? These were the questions, this was the question, these were some of the questions that motivated my so-called inappropriate comments in respect of the pandemic.

Why were they deprived of treatments available to patients in the hospital? Why were they simply sedated and allowed to die? Why was there an orchestrated campaign against treatments for Covid-19 in the community? The very place where those treatments mattered the most, where they would have had the greatest benefit, where even through the benefit of the placebo effect they could and would have given families hope, hope, the single most important ingredient to any therapy in times of great pain and suffering, why werethey even deprived of hope?

Well, the answer is simple, and it is on the record for this Committee, and it is on the record for this hearing. The Covid vaccine was granted. Emergency use authorisation by the European Medicines Agency on the condition that no treatments were available in the community. I repeat that no treatments were available in the community.

So what was I to think? Not just as a physician, not just as a GP caring for nursing homes, so what was I to think? How was I to respond? Somewhere in the region of 2,000 elderly residents died in Irish nursing homes. Ireland had the second highest number of nursing home fatalities in the world, second to Canada. Many of those elderly patients may have simply had the flu, and yet because of financial incentives they were labelled as Covid patients, they were deprived of treatments, deprived of human contact, deprived of the love and the warmth and the affection that the vast majority of nursing home residents depend upon like oxygen. And more importantly, they were deprived of hope. And the evidence for that atrocity is in this hearing and has been put before the Committee.

When the then President of the Irish Medical Council was asked during this hearing to explain why the elderly were being deprived, or what was her opinion that the elderly residents were being deprived of therapeutics that were being made available at the time to patients in the hospital? She replied, and I quote:

“Sometimes not everybody can have what they want when they want it.”

Throughout this hearing I have been accused of inappropriate statements, inappropriate comments, inappropriate emotion, perhaps, or an inappropriate place where I made those comments. But is the Committee not remotely cognisant of the inappropriate content of what has happened throughout this hearing, throughout my hearing of what was said? Let me repeat:

“Sometimes not everybody can have what they want when they want it.”

Tell that to the families of the 2,000 nursing home residents who died in this country and ask any of them do they find that inappropriate? Neither the question put to former President, Rita Doyle, nor the reply itself were printed anywhere in the media, but those words are recorded in the minutes of this hearing.

In April 2020, when I wrote to Minister Simon Harris, as a consequence of what was going on in my nursing home, and I tendered my resignation from the Irish Medical Council, I informed him of what was occurring in the nursing homes. I wrote to President Doyle. This Committee has talked about an exchange between myself and President Doyle. I hope this Committee is cognisant of the full record of that exchange. And I hope this Committee is cognisant of my resignation letter and the matters raised in my resignation letter. I wrote to President Doyle and informed her of what was happening in the nursing homes, of the suffering and unnecessary death; my words were ignored. They weren’t actioned. They weren’t escalated. They didn’t form the basis of any inquiry by the Medical Council. And I was talking about people who were dying. And we are here today and this entire hearing is constructed on the basis of inappropriate tweets, or that Twitter is not the right place to discuss these things, even though there were no other places available to discuss things, because we weren’t listened to, we were pushed out, ignored, vilified.

Why is it that my complaints to the then President of the Medical Council weren’t escalated? Would I be here today if I had have been listened to? I don’t think so. Despite complaints from the public, from myself and several of my colleagues, they ignored us. They ignored those who were suffering. They ignored those families - they ignored the families of those who died. Throughout this hearing you have continued to ignore them to this very day.

Shortly after my resignation, when I attended this public demonstration, in September 2020, and spoke publicly about the deaths within the nursing homes, I was placed under investigation. And my presence at that rally seems to form the substantive basis, a substantive basis for some of the complaints, so-called complaints against me. Yes, it was wrong of me to attend a public hearing, to contradict that would be facile. It was entirely wrong of me to attend, to supervene or go beyond public health guidelines, but the question before the Committee here is: Why did I do it? I have been a physician for 30 years. I have explained to you what was happening in the nursing homes, people were dying.

So yes, I didn’t use hand sanitiser, and yes, I may not have social distanced at a public rally, but is there any cognisance here whatsoever of ends justifying means? Is there any cognisance here of perhaps, yes, I did, I fully accept I overstepped the line? But I put it to the Committee, I put it to anyone in this room: If your grandmother was under my care, or your elderly family member was under my care and died as a consequence of what I was witnessing, would you expect your family physician maybe to speak out, to say something to try and do something?

Because if what happened in my nursing home that I cared for was to happen all over again, I would go to another rally, I would, because the crime, the so-called crime that I committed certainly pales in significance to the crime that I was witnessing. The formal documents, the directives, the physical evidence of these atrocities have been placed before the Council. The Irish Times, RTÉ, and institutions who pushed a blind adherence to all of these guidelines are not interested in that documentary evidence. And no politician or expert has been investigated, or even asked to account for any of these atrocities.

On March 4th 2021, my colleague, Dr. Gerry Waters, was suspended by the Medical Council, suspended from the medical register; he was deprived of his livelihood for refusing to administer Covid-19 vaccines to his patients and refusing to refer for PCR testing, which he correctly recognised as not detecting clinically relevant cases, and it was being used to inflate numbers and instil fear into the general public.

The then President of the Medical Council, Dr. Doyle, issued a written directive that was mentioned today. And the written directive was that doctors had a moral and ethical and professional, I quote: “A professional and ethical duty to promote public health guidelines.”

Not simply to adhere to public health guidelines. And the use of the word promote I have pointed out throughout this hearing was targeted and specific, it was targeted towards me and targeted to my profession. That single word effectively deprived us doctors of any right of criticism, and obligated every doctor in Ireland to follow orders or face the consequences, because any form of criticism is a failure to promote, any form whatsoever is failure to promote.

And the President of the Medical Council to walk upon the Constitution of Ireland and to rewrite the Guide for Ethical Behaviour for doctor, no doctor is morally obligated or ethically obligated to promote a therapy or a drug or a treatment or a guideline if he or she feels that those guidelines are dangerous or detrimental to the health or wellbeing of their patients.

But that single rule, that single rule, first do no harm, that’s contradicted exactly in Dr. Doyle’s directive that was issued to all of us. And Dr. Waters, when he was suspended, what was the purpose of that, if not to send a message to all of us, to all doctors in Ireland, that if you do not administer the Covid vaccine, or you do not promote the public health guidelines, you face similar consequences. So what was happening to the Irish Medical Council? The Irish Medical Council is supposed to exist, when I was a member, according to its raison d’etre is to protect patients, not to order doctors to promote public health guidelines regardless of theirconscience and regardless of their understanding of what those guidelines are and their understanding of therapeutics. But despite the warning issued by the Medical Council in written form and in practical forms of suspending a colleague for refusing to administer the vaccine, a steady stream of my colleagues followed, despite the warning, the censures and despite the erasure, and despite the media slur from RTÉ and The Irish Times and the Independent; Dr. Patrick Morrissey, the late Dr. Martin Feely, Dr. Neville Wilson, Dr. Vincent Carroll, Dr. Anne McCluskey, Dr. William Ralph, sitting here beside me today, Dr. Gerry Waters, Dr. Mick McConville, so was I in isolation? No, I wasn’t, thankfully and fortunately I wasn’t. Fortunately I think for my profession. Some have already been sanctioned, and some are awaiting their hearings with the expectation - with the exception, and with the exception of the late Dr. Martin Feely, all of the aforementioned have come to some or all of these hearings and to my hearing to show their support. And I know that Dr. Martin Feely would be here with us today were he still here.

It is ironic, I repeat, beyond ironic that the raison d’etre, the motto of the Irish Medical Council is to protect patients and support doctors. I have been under investigation by this Council for almost six years now. It is probably one of the longest and protracted investigations in the history of the Irish Medical Council. During my hearing I have not spoken of the toll this investigation has taken upon my family, my friendships, I will only say that at the height of this investigation, myself and my family felt compelled to close my practice, to sell our home and move from our neighbourhood, in part because some of our neighbours didn’t wish that their children should play with the children of the anti-vax doctor.

The Medical Council that I served on, I believe, has a role to play in that, because I did resign, I wrote a resignation letter, and I raised the concerns, but they weren’t listened to, they were dismissed, and so I am here today. Yes, my language may have been inappropriate. Yes, Twitter is an inappropriate forum, but that doesn’t get past the fact that I raised my concerns with Dr. Doyle, with the Medical Council, of which I was a member of, and those concerns were flatly dismissed and ignored.

You have decided to issue your findings some six years after the investigation has begun. I can only presume that the Council feels the public have forgotten some of the atrocities that were presided over, that the Medical Council, I feel, has failed or refused to investigate or consider.

Whilst I must accept the findings, and I will accept the findings of this hearing, if I am to continue to work and to pay my bills, I do not see this as an honest hearing. Those who died avoidable lonely deaths in the nursing homes have not been heard. Those patients who died and were deprived of screening and care during the lockdowns have not been heard. Those who suffered mental health depression and suicide as a consequence of unnecessary lockdowns have not been heard. Those children who were deprived of two formative years of their education and normal development have not been heard. Those who have suffered and died and been injured as a consequence of the so-called vaccines, they have not been heard. The increase in medical mortality in this country and beyond, since the introduction of genetic vaccines, they have not been heard. The increased incidence of cancers since the introduction of these vaccines, theyhave not been heard either.

To my mind and to my conscience this hasn’t been a hearing. There has been no hearing, and for as long as those responsible remain within the positions they occupy today, there will be no hearing. In failing to hear these people, these real people, these patients, the Medical Council, I feel, has utterly failed in its remit. And until those voices are heard, be they alive or be they dead, then I say to you, not as a doctor, but as a man, as a father, as a Christian and as a citizen of the Irish republic, that until there is a full public Inquiry into what has been visited upon the people, it is my honest and humble opinion that the government and its regulatory authorities, who acted on its behalf during this pandemic, have blood on their hands.

And I will finish upon this point; you have issued your findings and your verdict, and whilst I must respectfully accept those findings, I say to you again, I make no apologies for being guided by my conscience. I make no apologies for advocating for my patients. I make no apologies for refusing to administer a drug or a vaccine, which I know in my heart and in my mind and in my education, to be both dangerous and unnecessary.

To paraphrase an old philosopher; one day we will all stand before a different court, a higher court, much higher than this one and any of the Courts of men, and I know in my heart that that is a court where a great many of the verdicts of this world will be resoundingly overturned. And that’s my submission.

Related articles:

The Interview: Dr Michael McConville

Ireland’s persecuted doctors show up to support Dr Mick McConville for his fitness-to-practise hearing in Dublin

“The real pro-vax people call me a hypochondriac and tell me vaccines don’t hurt people and it must have been something else. The really anti-vax people at the other end, they tell me I got what I deserve because I took an experimental gene therapy.

So the people at either ends of the spectrum I can’t really talk to, it’s the ones in the middle that I need to raise awareness with them because a lot of them are not even aware that people like myself exist”.

Chris Nemeth, Covid jab injuries campaigner

In this interview we discuss:

• Channel 9’s coverage of Chris’ compensation award

• Why he’s chosen to fight on for other victims of the injections

• And how censorship meant he didn’t make an informed decision about the shot

Full interview:

Related article:

Melbourne father-of-two Chris Nemeth receives the largest Covid jab injury payout to date, more than $6 million

Former Australian MP Craig Kelly responds to Channel 9's coverage of Covid jab injuries while the station's highest paid broadcaster says sorry

Fresh from walking out of his fitness-to-practise hearing before the Irish Medical Council at a Dublin hotel to ‘catch a bus’, I talk to the retired GP about the devastating fallout from the Covid era.

Accused of professional misconduct over social media posts during the so-called pandemic, Dr Michael (Mick) McConville delivered a power submission before walking out of the session to a standing ovation to jump on his lift back to Co. Fermanagh where he’s now based.

We discuss the fraudulent use of the PCR tests to manufacture a pandemic in the imaginations of the public, the rise in myocarditis in our young since the shots and why we need to talk about cancer causing ingredient SV40 in the injections.

We also look at the increase in young people dying suddenly and unexpectedly and why it’s a doctor’s duty to protect his patients even if public policy dictates otherwise.

You can find Dr Michael McConville on X HERE.

Related article: