As usual, Hitler and them damn Nazis getting dragged through the mud. It is interesting that Abi worries about history being re-written in real time during the current shitshow but cannot see that the history we have been fed about Hitler and National Socialism is not necessarily all correct and above board.
Every thing is not fake, but it takes effort and critical thinking to exxtract the truth from the many distractions and deceptions foisted on us by a supine and controlled Media.
Only when bellys are hungry and arses are cold will reality once again assert itself.
Too much easy living comfort ,makes people soft and weak, bellys tickled, available for conquest , destroying the basic survival instinct.
Thomas Jefferson figured it out, ' The blood of a Nation needs to be spilt each generation for it to survive and thrive'.
Yep exactly. Using generalisations like “everything is fake” is a Strawman argument levelled against those that are pointing out inconsistencies in the presented narrative. Similarly, to claim there are people out there saying “every victim is a crisis actor” is as ludicrous as claiming that there aren’t any crisis actors. There clearly are both victims and crisis actors. That’s how the nonsense works, by muddying the waters of truth and fiction. There were real victims in 9/11 and 7/7 (and “Covid” for that matter) despite the presented narrative being a pack of lies. The “West” isn’t destroying “itself” either. The people destroying the West aren’t a part of it. They are “Globalist parasites” that have been sucking the West dry while it suited them
Absolutely but as far as I'm concerned Iain Davis demonstrably proved that the Manchester Arena was a psyop. His assertion that there was no bomb seems credible to me. It bothers me that Aisling keeps insisting otherwise. I really believe it's a woman thing. She's obviously jealous of Gemma OD who is a supporter of Richard D Hall but in not separating emotion from fact she's making herself look ridiculous.
Who are the victims of covid exactly? I don't know a single person who was made even moderately sick by "covid". But I know lots who tested positive for "covid" who had absolutely nothing wrong with them.
Of course no one was a victim of Covid....that’s why I said “Covid”. There were genuine victims of Convid though, like the Midazolam murders and the Dr husband of my friend Charlotte who was killed by the jab
There was definitely a disease event where I live. If you're too caught up dissecting the propaganda, you might actually be distracted from what's actually making people ill.
Have you watched the army guy briefing some WEF/Davos type meeting about how you use toxins to infect key influencers in an area, then claim it’s a virus & before you know it all the local hypochondriacs are convinced they have come down with it. He thought it was a real wheeze….dupers delight all over his face
I look forward to listening to this interview, and also to reading the book. I have great respect for this endeavor, and for both of you for standing up and speaking out in the madness of this time.
There's a high probability that all the images and video that were given to the public are all fake anyway. If they create a news story it would be too risky to let anything legitimate get out because certain people would rip it to pieces.
Just like 911, no one saw anything locally because they were using smoke machines to hide the towers, then they released all the fake photos and cartoon footage to the public, and left people to argue over them for the next 10 years.
That's why I don't trust Richard D Hall. The show with the globe earth behind him on his show.
A fair bit of his other work fails the truthermometer also.
In no Universe has anyone anywhere considered '' pale '' people to be less. So Abi heard that conversation ? Really? The blacks are having to be taught by our lefties that they are our equals and indeed are currently maliciously being taught that they are our superiors. It's all just malignant politics. Does any mainland Brit harbour a pathogenic hatred of the conquering Romans? Of course not !!
As long as an individual thinks critically and is always on the search for truth, they can't go far wrong. I've never heard Abi say that there is no evidence that COVID exists.
We don't know what the Israeli population was injected with. We don't know whether or not we can rely on statistics churned out by the Israeli government. We know that the UK government has manipulated the UK statistics. We were openly told about that. It seems likely (to me anyway) that there was a difference in the contents of the various vaccine batches. That, as far as I am concerned, has been satisfactorily established.
I just realised that that you are both not what I thought. I stopped listening to Abi months ago. She blocks people, a bit like YouTube and Facebook do 😂. But after listening to this, I'm soon glad I don't listen anymore. It's all fake guys, and these two are muppets.
Anyone who okays Douglas Murray whilst pearl clutching (for years) that she was arrested for swearing/breach of the peace is a hugely privileged type. Not who I thought she was so unfollowing. PS - the Gazans are being genocided by Israel
/the West whilst you two couldn't give a flying fuck despite all your psuedo Christianity. The execrable ‘Irreverend podcast’ cult hypocrites come to mind.
Thanks for the input. I don't claim to know the truth of the matter but simply share that some are pointing out that Gaza is also fake. I don't spend much time investigating much nowadays, especially as the grip is tightened on the Internet. I used to love it, but alas, it is dead. But you can go to places to see examples. FakeOtube.com is a good start. As I said, I know nothing for sure but I keep an open mind.
Richard Hall seems like a controlled opposition operative and talking about suspicious deaths re Manchester is ludicrous. It was staged and they simply sheepdipped (gave new identities to) the alleged dead people. What surprises me with Rich is that he has a page listing 40 excellent analyses of Manchester by UK Critical Thinker on his website, now that does surprise me. They are wonderful analyses - highly recommended.
With you on everything but the moon landings. That’s like saying “I’m a vegan, I just eat Veal”
The moon landings is one of the easiest lies to expose. I recommend Dave McGowan’s Wagging the Moon Doggie. Both enlightening and hillarious. You can find it on thevoid.uk
First one must prove the moon is a reflective floating ball. The fact that we see the same "face" of the moon and the fact that the moon's "glow" is cool (contrary to the sun's which is hot) suggests it is not.
Also, If you see a light source shining on a bald head there’s a hot spot and then the intensity of the light falls away. What you don’t see is uniform brightness over the whole surface
There are factors causing lack of uniformity but you don't see hot spots and fall off. This is addressed here (it's in Italian but will translate into English after a few seconds):
If we're talking hotspots created by artificial lights you're probably right, however, if there is light which might superficially resemble a hotspot but, in fact, isn't a hotspot then we need to seek understanding.
So-called conspiracy theorists are accused of suffering from the Dunning-Kruger effect and as much as I hate to admit that "conspiracy theorists" are guilty of any wrong kind of thinking, despite being a great disbeliever of official narratives myself, I think the accusation has some merit.
We should avoid as much as possible as thinking we know more than we do and rather than rely on our generally very small font of knowledge when it comes to specialist subjects we should look to others who know more. Of course, just because someone knows more on a subject doesn't automatically mean they're correct but we should at least look rather than simply relying on our very small font of knowledge and common sense which won't always be up to the task of working things out.
Why don't you read what has been written by people who know more above and then get back to me.
Dunning-Kruger effect - a cognitive bias in which people with limited competence in a particular domain overestimate their abilities.
'That’s like saying “I’m a vegan, I just eat Veal”'
No it isn't, that's a completely false equivalence. I do not call myself a conspiracy theorist or think of myself as one, I call myself a psyop analyst ... and what I'm always looking for is how they dupe us but particularly dupe those who disbelieve them - they want to dupe those who disbelieve them (correctly most of time although we have a hard time actually working out the truth because they push out so many streams of propaganda to bamboozle and fragment us) as much as they want to dupe those who believe them ... if not moreso. And they've duped the disbelievers big time with the moon landings hoax. The moon landings "hoax" is a psyop just like the flat earth psyop.
Wagging the Moondoggie is a masterwork of propaganda.
Wagging the Moondoggie seems extremely compelling - I was certainly persuaded on the first step of my moon landings journey when I read it - however, it is just clever propaganda. When you spend a little time reading what more knowledgeable people say on the subject you realise Dave McGowan is just a clever propagandist. Even people who admire Wagging the Moondoggie know he's an agent from what he writes on other stuff - they think, "Oh yeah, he's an agent but what he writes on the moon landings is the truth." As if. They don't have agents telling the whole truth on anything. Agents telling the whole truth on anything is not a thing. In the case of the moon landings though Dave has not a word of relevant truth. He has words of truth but they're not relevant truth and they're used purely as misleading propaganda.
I'm bound to say Steven's comment set me off on a search as I reminded myself once again to always question my assumptions as they are actually what I consider to be fact if I'm being honest with myself. So I found this,13 hours of it. My search for truth continues.
Aisling, as an investigative journaist, have you attempted to contact any of the survivors of the arena bombing? These are real people living with real injuries from this atrocious terror attack. What is there story? What is their version of events? They deserve to have their voice heard, otherwise all these conspiracy theories will continue to propogate.
As usual, Hitler and them damn Nazis getting dragged through the mud. It is interesting that Abi worries about history being re-written in real time during the current shitshow but cannot see that the history we have been fed about Hitler and National Socialism is not necessarily all correct and above board.
Every thing is not fake, but it takes effort and critical thinking to exxtract the truth from the many distractions and deceptions foisted on us by a supine and controlled Media.
Only when bellys are hungry and arses are cold will reality once again assert itself.
Too much easy living comfort ,makes people soft and weak, bellys tickled, available for conquest , destroying the basic survival instinct.
Thomas Jefferson figured it out, ' The blood of a Nation needs to be spilt each generation for it to survive and thrive'.
Yep exactly. Using generalisations like “everything is fake” is a Strawman argument levelled against those that are pointing out inconsistencies in the presented narrative. Similarly, to claim there are people out there saying “every victim is a crisis actor” is as ludicrous as claiming that there aren’t any crisis actors. There clearly are both victims and crisis actors. That’s how the nonsense works, by muddying the waters of truth and fiction. There were real victims in 9/11 and 7/7 (and “Covid” for that matter) despite the presented narrative being a pack of lies. The “West” isn’t destroying “itself” either. The people destroying the West aren’t a part of it. They are “Globalist parasites” that have been sucking the West dry while it suited them
Absolutely but as far as I'm concerned Iain Davis demonstrably proved that the Manchester Arena was a psyop. His assertion that there was no bomb seems credible to me. It bothers me that Aisling keeps insisting otherwise. I really believe it's a woman thing. She's obviously jealous of Gemma OD who is a supporter of Richard D Hall but in not separating emotion from fact she's making herself look ridiculous.
100% agree. I have followed and liked Aisling for a few years but she is really damaging her cred as a critical thinker here
Who are the victims of covid exactly? I don't know a single person who was made even moderately sick by "covid". But I know lots who tested positive for "covid" who had absolutely nothing wrong with them.
Covid isn't and wasn't a thing.
Of course no one was a victim of Covid....that’s why I said “Covid”. There were genuine victims of Convid though, like the Midazolam murders and the Dr husband of my friend Charlotte who was killed by the jab
There was definitely a disease event where I live. If you're too caught up dissecting the propaganda, you might actually be distracted from what's actually making people ill.
Have you watched the army guy briefing some WEF/Davos type meeting about how you use toxins to infect key influencers in an area, then claim it’s a virus & before you know it all the local hypochondriacs are convinced they have come down with it. He thought it was a real wheeze….dupers delight all over his face
Yes, I have. I haven't ruled it out as a possibility, although there might have been an easier way to get those results.
5G?
I look forward to listening to this interview, and also to reading the book. I have great respect for this endeavor, and for both of you for standing up and speaking out in the madness of this time.
No one said everything is fake. The premise of this discussion is fake.
exactly #controlledopposition
There's a high probability that all the images and video that were given to the public are all fake anyway. If they create a news story it would be too risky to let anything legitimate get out because certain people would rip it to pieces.
Just like 911, no one saw anything locally because they were using smoke machines to hide the towers, then they released all the fake photos and cartoon footage to the public, and left people to argue over them for the next 10 years.
That's why I don't trust Richard D Hall. The show with the globe earth behind him on his show.
A fair bit of his other work fails the truthermometer also.
In no Universe has anyone anywhere considered '' pale '' people to be less. So Abi heard that conversation ? Really? The blacks are having to be taught by our lefties that they are our equals and indeed are currently maliciously being taught that they are our superiors. It's all just malignant politics. Does any mainland Brit harbour a pathogenic hatred of the conquering Romans? Of course not !!
As long as an individual thinks critically and is always on the search for truth, they can't go far wrong. I've never heard Abi say that there is no evidence that COVID exists.
I don’t know of any. Do you?
We don't know what the Israeli population was injected with. We don't know whether or not we can rely on statistics churned out by the Israeli government. We know that the UK government has manipulated the UK statistics. We were openly told about that. It seems likely (to me anyway) that there was a difference in the contents of the various vaccine batches. That, as far as I am concerned, has been satisfactorily established.
Buiochas o chroi, gratitude from the heart
Big Love and Huge Respect to the both of you. Gra mor agus meas ollmhor oraibh, mile buiochas, a thousand gratitudes....
I just realised that that you are both not what I thought. I stopped listening to Abi months ago. She blocks people, a bit like YouTube and Facebook do 😂. But after listening to this, I'm soon glad I don't listen anymore. It's all fake guys, and these two are muppets.
Anyone who okays Douglas Murray whilst pearl clutching (for years) that she was arrested for swearing/breach of the peace is a hugely privileged type. Not who I thought she was so unfollowing. PS - the Gazans are being genocided by Israel
/the West whilst you two couldn't give a flying fuck despite all your psuedo Christianity. The execrable ‘Irreverend podcast’ cult hypocrites come to mind.
Thanks for the input. I don't claim to know the truth of the matter but simply share that some are pointing out that Gaza is also fake. I don't spend much time investigating much nowadays, especially as the grip is tightened on the Internet. I used to love it, but alas, it is dead. But you can go to places to see examples. FakeOtube.com is a good start. As I said, I know nothing for sure but I keep an open mind.
A fantastic discussion between two great ladies who speak only common sense!👍❤️
2 muppets
A fantastic discussion between two great ladies who speak only common sense!👍❤️
I believe the moon landings. That's about it.
When Revelation of the Method is an essential part of their MO, not to recognise staged events such as the Manchester bombing as psyops indicates something faulty going on, a willful blindness. https://soundofheart.org/galacticfreepress/content/revelation-method-predictive-programming-and-prime-directive
Richard Hall seems like a controlled opposition operative and talking about suspicious deaths re Manchester is ludicrous. It was staged and they simply sheepdipped (gave new identities to) the alleged dead people. What surprises me with Rich is that he has a page listing 40 excellent analyses of Manchester by UK Critical Thinker on his website, now that does surprise me. They are wonderful analyses - highly recommended.
https://www.richplanet.net/richp_guest_menu.php?person=18
They fake stuff ... all the time, it's just what they do. They love duping us ... and seemingly we are happy to be duped. https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/q-how-often-do-they-fake-stuff-a
With you on everything but the moon landings. That’s like saying “I’m a vegan, I just eat Veal”
The moon landings is one of the easiest lies to expose. I recommend Dave McGowan’s Wagging the Moon Doggie. Both enlightening and hillarious. You can find it on thevoid.uk
First one must prove the moon is a reflective floating ball. The fact that we see the same "face" of the moon and the fact that the moon's "glow" is cool (contrary to the sun's which is hot) suggests it is not.
Also, If you see a light source shining on a bald head there’s a hot spot and then the intensity of the light falls away. What you don’t see is uniform brightness over the whole surface
There are factors causing lack of uniformity but you don't see hot spots and fall off. This is addressed here (it's in Italian but will translate into English after a few seconds):
https://moon--beyond-blogspot-com.translate.goog/2019/07/hotspots.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en
Also in a comment here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/SensibleSite/comments/eqfeqs/comment/fsi5wky/
Hot spots don't need to be addressed. Simply use your eyes and think.
If we're talking hotspots created by artificial lights you're probably right, however, if there is light which might superficially resemble a hotspot but, in fact, isn't a hotspot then we need to seek understanding.
So-called conspiracy theorists are accused of suffering from the Dunning-Kruger effect and as much as I hate to admit that "conspiracy theorists" are guilty of any wrong kind of thinking, despite being a great disbeliever of official narratives myself, I think the accusation has some merit.
We should avoid as much as possible as thinking we know more than we do and rather than rely on our generally very small font of knowledge when it comes to specialist subjects we should look to others who know more. Of course, just because someone knows more on a subject doesn't automatically mean they're correct but we should at least look rather than simply relying on our very small font of knowledge and common sense which won't always be up to the task of working things out.
Why don't you read what has been written by people who know more above and then get back to me.
Dunning-Kruger effect - a cognitive bias in which people with limited competence in a particular domain overestimate their abilities.
'That’s like saying “I’m a vegan, I just eat Veal”'
No it isn't, that's a completely false equivalence. I do not call myself a conspiracy theorist or think of myself as one, I call myself a psyop analyst ... and what I'm always looking for is how they dupe us but particularly dupe those who disbelieve them - they want to dupe those who disbelieve them (correctly most of time although we have a hard time actually working out the truth because they push out so many streams of propaganda to bamboozle and fragment us) as much as they want to dupe those who believe them ... if not moreso. And they've duped the disbelievers big time with the moon landings hoax. The moon landings "hoax" is a psyop just like the flat earth psyop.
Wagging the Moondoggie is a masterwork of propaganda.
It's exposed here: https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/wagging-the-moondoggie-a-masterwork
And American Moon is exposed here: https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/american-moon-2017-superficially
Wagging the Moondoggie seems extremely compelling - I was certainly persuaded on the first step of my moon landings journey when I read it - however, it is just clever propaganda. When you spend a little time reading what more knowledgeable people say on the subject you realise Dave McGowan is just a clever propagandist. Even people who admire Wagging the Moondoggie know he's an agent from what he writes on other stuff - they think, "Oh yeah, he's an agent but what he writes on the moon landings is the truth." As if. They don't have agents telling the whole truth on anything. Agents telling the whole truth on anything is not a thing. In the case of the moon landings though Dave has not a word of relevant truth. He has words of truth but they're not relevant truth and they're used purely as misleading propaganda.
I’ll have a look
I so appreciate your open-minded attitude.
I’ll have a closer look later, but on first viewing there seems to be nothing of any substance in the “debunking”
That's fine. Just let me know anything you think is of substance in Wagging the Moondoggie that refutes the moon landings.
Enjoyed this, thanks x
I'm bound to say Steven's comment set me off on a search as I reminded myself once again to always question my assumptions as they are actually what I consider to be fact if I'm being honest with myself. So I found this,13 hours of it. My search for truth continues.
https://us.europathelastbattle.net/watchnow-beta-test.html
Aisling, as an investigative journaist, have you attempted to contact any of the survivors of the arena bombing? These are real people living with real injuries from this atrocious terror attack. What is there story? What is their version of events? They deserve to have their voice heard, otherwise all these conspiracy theories will continue to propogate.