Nobody was stabbed in Parnell Square say the phoney false flag investigators. Like nobody was killed in Southport or the Manchester Arena. All lies aimed to misdirect and tarnish...
You often describe yourself as an 'old school journalist'. Bafflingly, you seem do this with a hint of pride. Those of us paying attention all know that The Nooz™️ is agenda-driven propaganda, whether the lackeys who work for these institutions (aptly named) realise it or not. Who decides which stories make the headlines, given the thousands of things happening every second of the day? The answer: Editors who are prepared to go along with the sanctioned narrative, no questions asked. Why you would keep drawing attention to your history of working for these population-level MK-ultra outfits? I would be hanging my head in shame, not claiming that I 'trained with the best'. More worryingly, your line seems to be, 'one is only allowed to question the things that I, Aisling deem acceptable'. Scary stuff, given the situation we are living through. Perhaps if you properly read the 12-part series by Francis O Neill (and openly debated any points you think don't stand up to scrutiny) rather than just sweeping the entire contents off the table because he has a middle name, that might lend you more credibility. Honestly, you generally seem a little shrill and prone to ad hominem attacks when you can't logically substantiate your emotionally driven gatekeeping.
I'll debate anyone on these subjects but they won't debate me. Imagine doing a 12 part series and still NO proof of crisis actors. That's some effort. All these mega long reports popped up after I declared the 'Emperor has no clothes' and they can't prove me wrong. Step in the ring. I'm ready to go. Old school journalism means you weed out the BS in seconds and you condense your opening argument to one sentence, one paragraph max, no waffle. Great training.
I'm open to the false flag narrative but I've yet to find ANY evidence that supports the victims are crisis actors. Imagine doing a 12 part series and still nothing. David A Hughes the same - 12 articles and counting! There must be something in there. Usually it can be distilled into one paragraph, one sentence even. So much waffle and no evidence.
Surely you understand the nature of Secret Services (clue in the name) and NDAs? Please look closely at some of the witness videos linked in the O Neill articles. The paucity of acting skills is laugh-out-loud funny (if the topic weren't so serious). A five-year-old could spot the inauthenticity. In addition, two things at once can be true. These events can have real victims attached whilst also being staged events. When dealing with deep-state psychopathic clubs that work in a pyramidal structure based on Kompromat and compartmentalisation, you have to entertain the notion that collateral damage of the odd dead peasant to serve a purpose is no biggy. If you can entertain the idea that the WMD narrative was fakery and lies, what exactly do you struggle with on other very publicly amplified homegrown terror events?
Spot on again Aisling. I like Mike Yeadon but agree with you that he isn’t getting it right on this one. And with the internet & AI, getting to know exactly what is truth & what isn’t, what is fake & what isn’t, is becoming increasingly difficult. Discernment is needed & many people lack that. I’m beginning to want to detach myself from the ‘world wide web’ which is so appropriately named & probably purposely so. We are all trapped methinks but there might still be time to escape & live up a mountain somewhere with a packet of seeds & a few hens 🙈
Hi Dorothy, yes Dr Yeadon has been a Godsend during the Covid hoax, his knowledge on vaccines was invaluable. He's one of the good guys but this false flag quagmire is nasty. I'm not sure he realises how vicious it is and how it entails being an absolute demon towards real victims (not crisis actors!). Best I can do is interrupt the programming at this stage. So many have fallen for this deception. There's no talking to them. Yes to hens in the mountains. As long as the drones don't show up! What a mess!
I have looked into this subject of the so called false flag stabbings on Parnell Square from every angle now and I have concluded that you're correct about the intent of the government and the security apparatus in Ireland to foster the idea that nothing happened to the children in Dublin on that day . In fact the government are conspiring with bad actors in the alternative media to give the false impression that there's nothing to see here people so just walk on now and mind your own business. The invasion of our country by inimical people is nothing to worry about and also none of your concern so stop sticking your nose into where it shouldn't be.
You are also correct about the A.I. digital panoptigon that's now being pushed as an instrument of safety and protection by the Trump oligarchic technocratic team mates Musk, Besos Zuckerberg and Ellison. It's coming and will be installed in Trump's term because that's why he was chosen for president.
I simply never have trusted Mike Yeadon either as he's been an insider for most of his life and my intuition told me not to fall for his posturing.
Good job and a well written comprehensive article Aisling.
Thanks Tom. It seems to be very important to counterintelligence that us critical thinkers fall for the false flag scenario and convince ourselves the victims of these various attacks are crisis actors. Those relentlessly pushing this narrative have outed themselves in my book. They protest too much. Plus you can see the network and how they endorse each other's BS. They put a lot of time, energy and money into trying to deceive us. We must be awfully important!
Now that the cultish “trust the plan “ Q psy-opped Trump supporters have been tricked into believing that they are winning the message has gone out to the infiltrated alternative media to stall all criticism of Trump with the wait and see dictum . Now anyone who questions the winning team is to be isolated and attacked without any qualms. This has spread far and wide into the consciousness of the dissidents who are now very reluctant to speak their minds on other subjects like the very strange behaviour of the authorities regarding the viscous attack on the children and the teacher in Parnell Square. They now want the faithful to think that the war is over when it's only just begun.
The mind games are off the charts Tom. Another refining process where we see those repeating 'wait and see' about Trump revealing where their allegiance lies. Are they being paid? Are they compromised? How come they're all saying the same thing? Are they just repeating it unconsciously? Yes some subjects like Parnell Square and excess deaths are off the menu for the new social credit score system in who gets ahead in the alternative media. If you want to say Brigitte Macron is a man, you're up three points instantly.
Exactly, Candace Owens is now engaged in this Brigitte Macron business big time, trying to lead us all up a cul de sac of irrelevant nonsense when the real story is Trump and the technocratic oligarchs teaming up to advance bio-digital convergence with the use of A.I. and transhumanist development in “warpspeed “ !
Hi Aisling, I have just watched the latest video by Candace Owen in which she said that she has three young boys under the age of six I believe so I may have been too hard on her in my earlier comment. This makes a big difference to her as her first instinct as a mother is to protect her children and in this instance as she's determined to root out paedophilia and bring into the light the probable grooming of the very young Macron by a teacher , female or male ,of 39 years old. She's a great researcher and presenter so I'm in mind to cut her some slack here on the Brigitte Macron subject.
Hey Tom, Candace Owens is one of the best presenters out there. She's very impressive but she's wrong on Brigitte Macron being a man. Looks like she's been set up to fail. She doesn't speak French and doesn't know the terrain in France. She's been fed this second hand info and has foolishly bet her career on it for some unknown reason. Now Brigitte Macron will end up being the victim and the whole narrative will be reframed.
Aisling What you just wrote above was my first thought and intuition as like yourself I read and speak French very well but when I heard Candace say that she had three young boys I asked a female friend of mine that had three children also about how she and other mothers felt after giving birth and she told me that she was like a protective mother hen for five or six years after the children were born. I was wondering could this be a factor in her being set up like this because we all know that these people have no scruples whatsoever. As a mother yourself does my analysis have any validity or is she just glory hunting?
You say Gemma O’Doherty is “widely discredited.” By who? What? Where? When? Why? She won enough money in her case against the Independent to basically retire in her 40s! Do you have any facts, or, are you just being calumnious?
No she didn't win enough money to retire in her 40s, that's her cover story so you don't ask any questions about who's financing her operation. Incredible the amount of people who repeat that. She's widely discredited because she can't stop lying and keeps contradicting herself - she's lied about most people in the Resistance movement. Made up big whoppers with zero evidence. Said Dave Cullen vandalised his own house for attention. Said Louise Roseingrave was a Big Pharma shill for reporting on the test that would provide a definitive link between the jab and death. Said Dolores Cahill was a plant even though she warned everybody about the dangers of the jabs. Said Enoch Burke was a psyop, that his religion was 'filth'. She's just can't help herself. The lies keep pouring out and they're so easy to dismantle, but you've got to love the Truth first. You've got to care for it and then you'll see. She's detested for her lies and rightly so. Imagine how powerful we'd be if we collectively didn't tolerate lies or make excuses for them. We'd be magnificent.
How do you know what the settlement was? You say she’s “widely discredited,” but only give your own opinion, not facts. Gemma says things that appear/seem outlandish, and you guys have some beef I know little about. But facts don’t care about our feelings. If you’ve got insider information, spill!
False premise though. It's not as fake as you imagine - like that everyone is a crisis actor playing a role. That's not it and is misleading in and of itself.
In winters, we wear woollen pullovers and jackets along with long pants and stockings, while in summers, we wear cotton shirts that allow air to pass through or dry the sweat easily.
They also wear eye protection
In case of blood splatter !!! And helmets were necessary !!
I watched the long documentary on rumble - a very sensible lady pointed out a lot of things and had plenty of proof. It was a hoax. I think Richard D Hall‘s documentary on the Boston Bombing proves that was a hoax & his documentary about Jo Cox MP proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that that was a hoax and there’s an innocent man languishing in jail for her murder. As far as these recent stabbings go, I think they are for real.
I agree that murders happened in southport but that does not mean the official narrative is the truth. 'False flag' does not mean total psyop, it means what it says on the tin - ie responsibility for said acts are wrongly attributed (wrong flag on the ship as such) .Southport does have a wider agenda and those little girls were murdered as part of a ritual but you need to look into it deeply . I have so far done 2 articles on this https://open.substack.com/pub/callystarforth/p/the-southport-saga-part-1-825?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1eq51l
Powerful! Pertinent! You really do see the big picture, not least because you challenge yourself with the right questions. Your honest professionalism has long gained my respect and made me realise how much the absolute truth matters!
You also pointing out here how elaborate this deception is and what the result is.
Hey Jim, you must have a job monitoring me. You're like my shadow. How are ya? Yes I'll get on to the space deception with Elon Musk's Mars trips. It will make more sense to you then. I know it's a lot to take on board. We've been so conditioned to believe we're third rock from the Sun, spinning around space, in an ever expanding universe. I get it - too much for some people. I'm not trying to be popular! Anyway I'm nailing my colours to the mast. Bring it on. Let's go!
I cut through the BS 'Jim'. Were children stabbed in Parnell Square on November 23, 2023 or weren't they? 'Michael' says no they weren't, then he says they might have brought in some injured children for the production. Daft. Stunned anyone buys into this nonsense. Morto! I'm clearly not under duress. I speak freely It's called having a working brain. I know it's rare these days. Must come as a shock.
I don’t believe anyone was stabbed on Parnell Street. A small country like Ireland couldn’t keep the victims names quiet. And, if the media were doing their jobs, they’d be knocking on doors and getting the “latty tat!” Having little children stabbed at school in Ireland is huge news, but all we hear is crickets. Nothing has been heard or seen of the perpetrator either. It’s all looking very suss.
That little girl was on life support in Temple Street hospital, hanging on by a thread. She's a miracle. I don't blame you for thinking it didn't happen, that's how they've played it - covering up migrant crime. Yes agree, it's very suss - no picture of the perpetrator, no trial, just all this space for speculation.
You often describe yourself as an 'old school journalist'. Bafflingly, you seem do this with a hint of pride. Those of us paying attention all know that The Nooz™️ is agenda-driven propaganda, whether the lackeys who work for these institutions (aptly named) realise it or not. Who decides which stories make the headlines, given the thousands of things happening every second of the day? The answer: Editors who are prepared to go along with the sanctioned narrative, no questions asked. Why you would keep drawing attention to your history of working for these population-level MK-ultra outfits? I would be hanging my head in shame, not claiming that I 'trained with the best'. More worryingly, your line seems to be, 'one is only allowed to question the things that I, Aisling deem acceptable'. Scary stuff, given the situation we are living through. Perhaps if you properly read the 12-part series by Francis O Neill (and openly debated any points you think don't stand up to scrutiny) rather than just sweeping the entire contents off the table because he has a middle name, that might lend you more credibility. Honestly, you generally seem a little shrill and prone to ad hominem attacks when you can't logically substantiate your emotionally driven gatekeeping.
I'll debate anyone on these subjects but they won't debate me. Imagine doing a 12 part series and still NO proof of crisis actors. That's some effort. All these mega long reports popped up after I declared the 'Emperor has no clothes' and they can't prove me wrong. Step in the ring. I'm ready to go. Old school journalism means you weed out the BS in seconds and you condense your opening argument to one sentence, one paragraph max, no waffle. Great training.
I'm open to the false flag narrative but I've yet to find ANY evidence that supports the victims are crisis actors. Imagine doing a 12 part series and still nothing. David A Hughes the same - 12 articles and counting! There must be something in there. Usually it can be distilled into one paragraph, one sentence even. So much waffle and no evidence.
Surely you understand the nature of Secret Services (clue in the name) and NDAs? Please look closely at some of the witness videos linked in the O Neill articles. The paucity of acting skills is laugh-out-loud funny (if the topic weren't so serious). A five-year-old could spot the inauthenticity. In addition, two things at once can be true. These events can have real victims attached whilst also being staged events. When dealing with deep-state psychopathic clubs that work in a pyramidal structure based on Kompromat and compartmentalisation, you have to entertain the notion that collateral damage of the odd dead peasant to serve a purpose is no biggy. If you can entertain the idea that the WMD narrative was fakery and lies, what exactly do you struggle with on other very publicly amplified homegrown terror events?
Here I go onto the ritual surrounding Southport incident - this is part 2 https://open.substack.com/pub/callystarforth/p/the-southport-saga-part-ii?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1eq51l. Part 1 is Aldo up on my site
I completely agree withe Anna
people are as thick as mince == l fucking despair
It's baaaaaaad.
Spot on again Aisling. I like Mike Yeadon but agree with you that he isn’t getting it right on this one. And with the internet & AI, getting to know exactly what is truth & what isn’t, what is fake & what isn’t, is becoming increasingly difficult. Discernment is needed & many people lack that. I’m beginning to want to detach myself from the ‘world wide web’ which is so appropriately named & probably purposely so. We are all trapped methinks but there might still be time to escape & live up a mountain somewhere with a packet of seeds & a few hens 🙈
Hi Dorothy, yes Dr Yeadon has been a Godsend during the Covid hoax, his knowledge on vaccines was invaluable. He's one of the good guys but this false flag quagmire is nasty. I'm not sure he realises how vicious it is and how it entails being an absolute demon towards real victims (not crisis actors!). Best I can do is interrupt the programming at this stage. So many have fallen for this deception. There's no talking to them. Yes to hens in the mountains. As long as the drones don't show up! What a mess!
Sorry Jim. We'll try harder to please you. Please, go on ahead and defer to the expert. What could possibly go wrong?
You back again! With nothing, zero, nada... Diverting the conversation off topic with your spew!
I have looked into this subject of the so called false flag stabbings on Parnell Square from every angle now and I have concluded that you're correct about the intent of the government and the security apparatus in Ireland to foster the idea that nothing happened to the children in Dublin on that day . In fact the government are conspiring with bad actors in the alternative media to give the false impression that there's nothing to see here people so just walk on now and mind your own business. The invasion of our country by inimical people is nothing to worry about and also none of your concern so stop sticking your nose into where it shouldn't be.
You are also correct about the A.I. digital panoptigon that's now being pushed as an instrument of safety and protection by the Trump oligarchic technocratic team mates Musk, Besos Zuckerberg and Ellison. It's coming and will be installed in Trump's term because that's why he was chosen for president.
I simply never have trusted Mike Yeadon either as he's been an insider for most of his life and my intuition told me not to fall for his posturing.
Good job and a well written comprehensive article Aisling.
Thanks Tom. It seems to be very important to counterintelligence that us critical thinkers fall for the false flag scenario and convince ourselves the victims of these various attacks are crisis actors. Those relentlessly pushing this narrative have outed themselves in my book. They protest too much. Plus you can see the network and how they endorse each other's BS. They put a lot of time, energy and money into trying to deceive us. We must be awfully important!
Now that the cultish “trust the plan “ Q psy-opped Trump supporters have been tricked into believing that they are winning the message has gone out to the infiltrated alternative media to stall all criticism of Trump with the wait and see dictum . Now anyone who questions the winning team is to be isolated and attacked without any qualms. This has spread far and wide into the consciousness of the dissidents who are now very reluctant to speak their minds on other subjects like the very strange behaviour of the authorities regarding the viscous attack on the children and the teacher in Parnell Square. They now want the faithful to think that the war is over when it's only just begun.
The mind games are off the charts Tom. Another refining process where we see those repeating 'wait and see' about Trump revealing where their allegiance lies. Are they being paid? Are they compromised? How come they're all saying the same thing? Are they just repeating it unconsciously? Yes some subjects like Parnell Square and excess deaths are off the menu for the new social credit score system in who gets ahead in the alternative media. If you want to say Brigitte Macron is a man, you're up three points instantly.
Exactly, Candace Owens is now engaged in this Brigitte Macron business big time, trying to lead us all up a cul de sac of irrelevant nonsense when the real story is Trump and the technocratic oligarchs teaming up to advance bio-digital convergence with the use of A.I. and transhumanist development in “warpspeed “ !
Hi Aisling, I have just watched the latest video by Candace Owen in which she said that she has three young boys under the age of six I believe so I may have been too hard on her in my earlier comment. This makes a big difference to her as her first instinct as a mother is to protect her children and in this instance as she's determined to root out paedophilia and bring into the light the probable grooming of the very young Macron by a teacher , female or male ,of 39 years old. She's a great researcher and presenter so I'm in mind to cut her some slack here on the Brigitte Macron subject.
Hey Tom, Candace Owens is one of the best presenters out there. She's very impressive but she's wrong on Brigitte Macron being a man. Looks like she's been set up to fail. She doesn't speak French and doesn't know the terrain in France. She's been fed this second hand info and has foolishly bet her career on it for some unknown reason. Now Brigitte Macron will end up being the victim and the whole narrative will be reframed.
Aisling What you just wrote above was my first thought and intuition as like yourself I read and speak French very well but when I heard Candace say that she had three young boys I asked a female friend of mine that had three children also about how she and other mothers felt after giving birth and she told me that she was like a protective mother hen for five or six years after the children were born. I was wondering could this be a factor in her being set up like this because we all know that these people have no scruples whatsoever. As a mother yourself does my analysis have any validity or is she just glory hunting?
You say Gemma O’Doherty is “widely discredited.” By who? What? Where? When? Why? She won enough money in her case against the Independent to basically retire in her 40s! Do you have any facts, or, are you just being calumnious?
No she didn't win enough money to retire in her 40s, that's her cover story so you don't ask any questions about who's financing her operation. Incredible the amount of people who repeat that. She's widely discredited because she can't stop lying and keeps contradicting herself - she's lied about most people in the Resistance movement. Made up big whoppers with zero evidence. Said Dave Cullen vandalised his own house for attention. Said Louise Roseingrave was a Big Pharma shill for reporting on the test that would provide a definitive link between the jab and death. Said Dolores Cahill was a plant even though she warned everybody about the dangers of the jabs. Said Enoch Burke was a psyop, that his religion was 'filth'. She's just can't help herself. The lies keep pouring out and they're so easy to dismantle, but you've got to love the Truth first. You've got to care for it and then you'll see. She's detested for her lies and rightly so. Imagine how powerful we'd be if we collectively didn't tolerate lies or make excuses for them. We'd be magnificent.
How do you know what the settlement was? You say she’s “widely discredited,” but only give your own opinion, not facts. Gemma says things that appear/seem outlandish, and you guys have some beef I know little about. But facts don’t care about our feelings. If you’ve got insider information, spill!
False premise though. It's not as fake as you imagine - like that everyone is a crisis actor playing a role. That's not it and is misleading in and of itself.
Just like the staged event that was The Manchester Arena staged event?
Why don’t you post some of the overwhelming evidence showing that was a staged event?
Aisling O'Laughlin...Independent, alt-media journalist..
"Getting to the heart of the matter"🤣🤣
https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.Qnpo7-yHc-7HCyLxnwfTxQHaL4?rs=1&pid=ImgDetMain
We need to start from the premise that ALL NEWS IS FAKE until proven otherwise.
As I posted before parademics in shirt sleeves ? On a very cold windy day
Temp was 10deg wind speed was 35kph , and paramedics in their summer gear ? Sleeves rolled up !!
Paramedics always wear short sleeves, all year round. They have to to keep their hands and wrists free. That was misdirection, Jim.
In winters, we wear woollen pullovers and jackets along with long pants and stockings, while in summers, we wear cotton shirts that allow air to pass through or dry the sweat easily.
They also wear eye protection
In case of blood splatter !!! And helmets were necessary !!
Ok JIm.
No they do not Aisling
I watched the long documentary on rumble - a very sensible lady pointed out a lot of things and had plenty of proof. It was a hoax. I think Richard D Hall‘s documentary on the Boston Bombing proves that was a hoax & his documentary about Jo Cox MP proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that that was a hoax and there’s an innocent man languishing in jail for her murder. As far as these recent stabbings go, I think they are for real.
Richard D Hall is a fraud. I wouldn't believe any of his investigations, unless you trust counterintelligence.
I agree that murders happened in southport but that does not mean the official narrative is the truth. 'False flag' does not mean total psyop, it means what it says on the tin - ie responsibility for said acts are wrongly attributed (wrong flag on the ship as such) .Southport does have a wider agenda and those little girls were murdered as part of a ritual but you need to look into it deeply . I have so far done 2 articles on this https://open.substack.com/pub/callystarforth/p/the-southport-saga-part-1-825?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1eq51l
Powerful! Pertinent! You really do see the big picture, not least because you challenge yourself with the right questions. Your honest professionalism has long gained my respect and made me realise how much the absolute truth matters!
You also pointing out here how elaborate this deception is and what the result is.
This is hard hitting, gloves off.
I love it!
Big respect
Awesome!!!
I am shocked to learn Dr. Mike Yeadon has been taken in! He is my Covid hero.
Hey Jim, you must have a job monitoring me. You're like my shadow. How are ya? Yes I'll get on to the space deception with Elon Musk's Mars trips. It will make more sense to you then. I know it's a lot to take on board. We've been so conditioned to believe we're third rock from the Sun, spinning around space, in an ever expanding universe. I get it - too much for some people. I'm not trying to be popular! Anyway I'm nailing my colours to the mast. Bring it on. Let's go!
I cut through the BS 'Jim'. Were children stabbed in Parnell Square on November 23, 2023 or weren't they? 'Michael' says no they weren't, then he says they might have brought in some injured children for the production. Daft. Stunned anyone buys into this nonsense. Morto! I'm clearly not under duress. I speak freely It's called having a working brain. I know it's rare these days. Must come as a shock.
I don’t believe anyone was stabbed on Parnell Street. A small country like Ireland couldn’t keep the victims names quiet. And, if the media were doing their jobs, they’d be knocking on doors and getting the “latty tat!” Having little children stabbed at school in Ireland is huge news, but all we hear is crickets. Nothing has been heard or seen of the perpetrator either. It’s all looking very suss.
That little girl was on life support in Temple Street hospital, hanging on by a thread. She's a miracle. I don't blame you for thinking it didn't happen, that's how they've played it - covering up migrant crime. Yes agree, it's very suss - no picture of the perpetrator, no trial, just all this space for speculation.