That's right. It makes conspiracy theorists look like assholes and that's its purpose: To undermine the movement and help introduce draconian new laws...
Richard is one of the few real journalists left in the UK. He brought out many good points in his analysis and since when did the truth ever try to prevent people questioning it by taking people to court for daring to ask questions and have an alternate opinion? Sadly we know Western governments do carry out false flag incidents and I am happy to question anything the UK government tells me is true as they have lied so often in the past. I have seen the results of many bomb attacks having lived through the IRA bombing campaign and the pictures from that arena looked nothing like the pictures of those bombings so even at that basic level questions needed to be asked. I thought we had all learned from "Dirty Dancing" not to just assume one type of people are innocents abroad while others are obviously guilty and that we are not permitted to question that assumption without baby being ousted from her own family or .......... sent to the corner as it seems you want to do to Richard.
Sorry you've got it wrong John, Richard D Hall is not a real journalist, he's a faker. His conclusion abou the Manchester Arena attack after so much 'investigative journalism' is utter nonsense. To say nobody died, when we know 22 died that night, is simply ridiculous. We heard from their families these past seven years. They're not lying. To say there was no bomb, when those who were killed and wounded sustained their injuries from a crudely made nuts and bolts bomb, is more nonsense. Incredible how many people he's tricked with his phoney investigations. If he was in a newsroom (at least in my day) the editor would have sent him packing, flimsy 'evidence', doesn't pass the most basic tests. This has exposed some very serious issues with 'our side' believing things that aren't true. I'm stunned.
I've seen Richard Hall's documentary on the Manchester bombing. The evidence he compiles is not simply compelling but conclusive. The evidence backing the official narrative is ... missing.
Iain Davis of Pseudopandemic fame has followed up this investigation with a new book about it. Looking forward to reading it. Just saying.
I grew up through the 'Troubles' in the north of Ireland & know what the aftermath of bombings really looks like.
When I saw images of the Manchester bombing it looked nothing like the aftermath of a real bombing. I said so at the time & was condemned for being 'insensitive'.
We were expected to believe there was a major terrorist incident without any photographic evidence. Just take it on trust because the state & their media are telling you.
Aisling O’Loughlin argues there was a list of the dead. How can that be faked?
This from someone who believes that governments & health professionals conspired massively during Covid pandemic to kill millions worldwide & rob even more of their most basic rights. Yet they wouldn’t be capable of faking a relatively small terrorist incident in Manchester. Gimme a break!
Richard d hall has investigated this event more than Aisling O’Loughlin obviously has & anyone commenting on here has. I just wish those naysayers would do the decent thing; watch his film & read his book.
If you grew up in the North Willie, you'll know well there are different types of bombs with different types of impacts. I've listened to the families of the victims speak. They're not lying. People died. There was a bomb blast and Martin Hibbert and his daughter Eve are in wheelchairs as a result of the home-made nuts and bolts bomb. They were there. They're not lying. Conman Richard D Hall has tricked you into picking on a guy and his daughter in wheelchairs who are trying to get their lives back on track after a bomb blast. It's kind of sick how he's manipulated people into behaving so badly. You've been played.
I don't know anything about this case at all but there are people who are actively conspiring with large groups of people to lead sheep to the slaughter. There might be an element of truth of what both sides are saying but you must weigh the lies as well. https://youtu.be/VwdkeQD6ii0?feature=shared... Sandy Hook, 9/11 Timothy McVeigh, JFK, Batman Shooter, LasVegas, The fact is the media along with vested interests are leading people to hate and fear one another. Throwing us towards trusting their lying science and leading us towards their divisions
I watched the documentary, more like a mockumentary. He's making shit up and passing it off as 'investigative journalism'. It's really bad Simon. I'm sorry to burst your balloon. There was a bomb blast and real people were murdered and injured that night in Manchester, May 22, 2017. You do the victims a great disservice when you believe the lies of a conman.
If you had suggested he was mistaken in this instance I would give you more credibility. But the fact that you have descended to such personal abuse says a lot about your character. The fact that Hall is a friend of your bete noir Gemma O’Docherty may be a contributing factor to this poison you are spreading about him.
The only argument I have against Richard D. Hall is in his attempt to disprove the Manchester Arena incident in the Combine's own courts. He is fighting on their ground not his. And the result is a foregone conclusion.
That said he is absolutely correct in his analysis of what happened or didn't happen that day. His research is irrefutable. That's all that matters to me. I don't care what the mainstream media say about it, or how that makes 'our side' look. The truth is what is important here. And Richard D. Hall has never shied away from it. God bless him.
Oh dear. He's tricked so many of you! Let me assure you his research is far from 'irrefutable'. I believe the victims of the Manchester Arena attack, those who survived to tell the tale. They're not lying. Martin Hibbert and his daughter are really in wheelchairs. They didn't get their injuries elsewhere. You've been grossly misled.
This is very dangerous logic that Aisling O’Loughlin is advancing here. I wonder why she is promoting it.
Put simply it is if you are to challenge the state narrative keep it believable, keep it small. Don’t frighten the NPCs with any major claims - even though they can be substantiated - otherwise the state will use this to blacken any opposition & to introduce totalitarian restrictions on free speech.
So we are to tiptoe around like church mice for fear of being seen by the general population as conspiracy nuts.
This is one good way to keep us all in our boxes.
This comes in the wake of the greatest state conspiracy we have seen in our life times - the Covid plandemic - where millions have died from lockdowns, withdrawal of health care & a toxic drug being forced on them.
Aisling O’Loughlin’s logic argument could be used to negate the entire case exposing the Covid fraud.
Should we have kept quiet about Covid because in the view of many of the mainstream public (‘Normies I believe you call them) to claim this was a ‘conspiracy’ by governments & health professionals around the world is just completely ridiculous & does the cause of truth great damage?
Read Richard D Hall’s book & watch his film , Ms O’Loughlin, before rushing to this ridiculous judgement. He can back up all his claims. Is that not what any good journalist should do?
No Willie I'm just pointing out the lies. Very sad to see so many people hoovering up the lies and repeating them as Truth, a very sorry state of affairs. Richard D Hall's 'evidence' is makey uppy nonsense. It doesn't hold water. It's been fabricated to misguide and make you look stupid. It's worked. You now think nobody died in Manchester on the night of May 22, 2017. He's really done a number on you. I know it's embarrassing to admit you've been conned but YOU'VE BEEN CONNED. And yes there are false flags and all that and yes all those 22s but to conclude nobody died is just embarrassingly stupid.
You have know idea what is true and false. You don’t care. You are protecting the child trafficking bastards because you are scared to go in the room and see the elephant. Thank goodness so many are calling you out and so few are in love with NWO propaganda as you are.
Richard’s work is outstanding, backed with evidence ir often (for the official narrative) a lack of it. Not just for Manchester but for many other false flag attacks.
Iain Davies’ new book also highlights the fact there is zero evidence anyone died in the Manchester ‘bombing’
I get your point that what is being done here, namely the perception that some lunatic conspiracy theorist thinks it was a hoax when it wasn’t (official narrative) but if anyone has seen the sham inquiry, which most shouting loudest won’t have seen, it is so obviously a cover up.
But Jamie Richard D Hall's conclusion that nobody was killed and there was no bomb and it was all a drill is utter nonsense. Do you actually believe that? If you do, it's time for a reassessment. You've been conned. Richard's work is far from 'outstanding'. It's riddled with holes, inconsistencies and contradictions. Do yourself a favour and stop believing lies. Discernment is going to be very important in the coming months. Know your enemy.
I think you may have got this one wrong. I've read Hall's book, and also the excellent Substack by a superb researcher Iain Davis on the background story and a daily witness account of Hall's trial. The whole thing stinks. These possible false flags are a minefield for the non specialist, and I wouldn't dream of giving a definitive opinion one way or the other. Just the old adage, qui bono? Certainly, Gemma's involvement is not helpful to Hall's case.
All waffle. You will never address any of the copious evidence. You will never look at the copious evidence. I can’t tell your motives but I suspect it is a mixture of fear and laziness.
No I'm right on this Dr McCloskey. I've done my research. He's a fraud and he's misled thousands of good people into a very dark place and made them believe absurdities while ruining the reputation of honest 'conspiracy theorists'. The victims are not actors. There was a bomb in the Manchester Arena that night, whether it was some kind of false flag or not is another matter.
He's clearly conned a lot of people. Those are just some examples. He's adept at twisting information to make it sound like 'investigative journalism'. Any newsroom editor would send you packing if you turned up with his 'evidence', at least in my day. He's manipulating info. Wouldn't be surprised if there's a team behind him. This isn't just about Gemma O'Doherty's involvement although it set off alarm bells as she plays the same tricks. I was certainly suspicious when she started goading the alt media into supporting Richard D Hall, the best 'investigative false flag journalist out there' - sorry to break the news, he's job is to mislead. He's not on our side and neither is Gemma O'Doherty.
I like a lot of his work and he seems like a decent man, but I was completly taken aback by this when he came out with it. Either he lost the run of himself, or like so many of the UK Truther scene refuses to believe any kind of Jihad is real and every attack is a false flag. Also some of the worst horrors of the attack were covered up. This included terrified and traumatised teen girls being sexually assulted by Taxi Drivers of Peace while they were trying to get home in the fear and confusion. This is well known in Manchester but was all covered up. Then there was the sick Manchester One concert literally dancing on the grave of the murdered kids. It was sordid and Liam Gallagher in his orange jacket keeping and all the NPCs and Normies happy. Morrissey is the only one who called all that carry on out.
Poor decision and poor taste and he is going to pay a massive price for it. A classic example of choose your topics wisely if you can. It's a sad story on every level. This world is a dark place.
Finally a comment that gets it! Great insights as always Thomas, thank you. Imagine believing nobody was killed in that bomb blast and being convinced to pick on a Dad and a daughter in wheelchairs. D Hall's 'evidence' is fantasy land. I'm shocked by the levels of gullibility in the so-called 'awake' community. Fast asleep at the wheel, more like.
Richard D is good friend of Gemma O'Doherty. I was surprised at this. I put it down to him not being in touch with affairs in Ireland. I wrote to him with some of Aislings material on O'Doherty. I don't think it changed his mind.
I've followed Richard D's work for years. If he's a state agent then we all are.
We're all allowed to get it wrong once in a while like Aisling does here I believe with Richard D.
They're similar operations. They cross-promote. If people truly cared about the Truth they'd detect all the lies but sadly people have drifted very very far from God.
Have you actually read & watched all of Richard’s work on the Manchester event? It doesn’t sound like you have in this article
Also have you read any of Iain Davies subsequent work on the event and on Richard’s show trial? Iain was on the Delingpod last week.
I don’t completely discount that Richard might be an intelligence asset playing a role but I don’t think you have depicted his analysis of the Manchester event accurately in this piece because there is a ton of evidence that proves this was a faked event, the fact he wasn’t allowed to present any of it in court is a big clue on its own!
Yes I've studied Richard D Hall. He's not a real investigative journalist. He's certainly not working alone. He's completely flooded the zone with his fake conspiracy stuff to make our side look bad. UFOs to boot and all that fake space crap. It's clearly a set up. Looks like he's put a spell on people, they're actually believing his nonsense and think nobody was injured that night in Manchester. That's a bit thick, am I right?
Seriously, there is no way that Richards incredible investigation is fake. Then of course Ian Davis has also conducted his own. Is Aisling the actual red herring here? You know from the same institution as Marianna Spring?!
Ok if Richard D Hall's 'incredible investigation' is not fake then are the 22 victims from the bombing just pretending to be dead? You can't have it both ways. Is Martin Hibbert just pretending to be in a wheelchair like his daughter? Do you really believe they sustained their injuries elsewhere. Give your head a wobble for goodness sake! You're letting down all the people who rely on real evidence to win arguments. You're buying into nonsense. You've been had. Take it on the chin and learn your lesson.
Well done, it’s the signature hallmark all over of a set up.
Our lot have to work their favouritism & fam girl boy ing at every step.
I thought I was beyond it a few yrs now and then got burnt with Michael McNamara with his abrupt volte face.
But he stayed normal acting for long years until his vote when he joined the main party and backed everything he said he decried.
Every time someone does something incredulous… well it’s credulous. It’s exactly as it looks. Not stupid pple don’t do stupid things. Hence they’ve got game and they’re doing it intentionally.
Don’t give second chances.
The Donegal artist was another plausable one. Then he does this bs made up story and uses the Freemason word to show in k on me of you “token” dropped anywhere in convo, even I’m NOT token.. is token.
Then it’s like oh yeah… multi millionaire the media loved who did a load of creepy occult art, backstory of hating the church (useful to shape occult operatives etc)
I’m not saying go church here at ALL, they did abuse and subjugate and did some good stuff too.
But it’s a modus operandi to further go back and recruit these kids I’ve noticed now.
Anyways sounds tangential but we gotta be discerning and step up OURSELVES. Don’t rely on any “hero’s”
In saying that, I appreciate you and your work, standing along side us, no ego there and you’ve never put a foot wrong.
You spoke about masons & occult stuff from the get go too.
Aisling is correct saying that this is all about destroying the reputation of 'conspiracy theorists'. The mainstream media presstitutes are labelling anyone with a different view to them as a pusher of 'misinformation'.
We look nuts when we say nobody died that night in Manchester when clearly they did. Or that there was no bomb when there's Martin Hibbert in his wheelchair, legs gone skinny from lack of use. And we've heard all the other victims' stories. They're not lying. We look cruel and untrustworthy. Richard D Hall has deceived his audience, all on purpose. Another phoney investigative journalist tricking his viewers into false conclusions. We pay a heavy price when we don't use our God-given discernment.
Taking sides is one sure way of being herded into 'consensus' and then steered back into 'belief'. Belief say, in an official narrative which is patently unbelievable.
Consider this. We've learned all about the victims. We've heard from their mothers and fathers. We've sat through the inquiry. We've heard about the security that night. We know the details and yet Richard D Hall has convinced his gullible followers that nobody died and there was no bomb blast. Most people on Telegram went crazy with me for pointing out 22 people did, in fact, die that night and there were injuries consistent with a nuts and bolts homemade bomb. They'd bought into the lie and couldn't work their way back. We need to be operating on a much higher level than this if we're to make it through this onslaught. We can't keep falling for every counterintelligence trick thrown our way. We've got to love love love the Truth!
I wouldn't make a massive issue with this to be honest. This *might* be being used as a distraction to more looming problems, for example the international situation, the WHO 'plandemic treaty' etc (you want to know about treaties, ask Native Americans or The Maori). Y'all gotta focus on the bigger picture, the little things, and this is a little thing despite the drama around it, will sort itself out, either way!
Weeding out traitors is about the most important job there is during a war. This article has exposed our weaknesses in believing counterintelligence baloney and declaring it's incredible 'investigative journalism' when it's no such thing. Anybody who thinks nobody died that night and who thinks it's ok to pick on a father and daughter in wheelchairs has been played cruelly. Let it be a lesson to use our own God given intelligence to figure things out in the future and to have the ability to spot fakers who pretend to be on 'our side' while leading us on a merry dance.
Exactly Aisling. As I have said before, I treat everything as a psy op until circumstances prove otherwise. We all have to be more pro-active and do our own thinking rather than having it conveniently laid out for us by the likes of RTE and the BBC. Alas, most people prefer the latter.
Have you watched every interview by the actors? Have you watched the parents of the man killed by 22 bits of shrapnel? The action g is hilarious, I wish I could post it. The father states, and this is less than 48 hours after he was blown to bits. “ he would have loved to seen the messages, he has made it, stardom… he’s up there now laughing… enjoying every moment. The father… “ I would love to die having all that love… he loves being there, he really enjoyed himself, he was doing selfies before he died!!
This is top class acting!! Nobody died, at 22:30 on the 22nd, by a 22 year old man on the 22 anniversary of the opening.
HOWEVER, the original investigation and all of Halls evidence is by a YT named UK critical Thinker, a lad from Manchester. He suggests that 22 is a special ops team 22 squadron, a strategy of tension, as in 22nd Brussels airport, 22nd Lee Rigby, Munich, London all 2nd. Was hall set up? Why did hall wear a black white check tie at the court trial? Why so UK critical thinker not mentioned?
Madeline mCanne did not exist- she is like the woman in the water who disappeared and Lucy Letby 33 who ‘ killed all those babies. Tv doctor MM who disappeared into the heat and died. Stage stage stage.
Richard is one of the few real journalists left in the UK. He brought out many good points in his analysis and since when did the truth ever try to prevent people questioning it by taking people to court for daring to ask questions and have an alternate opinion? Sadly we know Western governments do carry out false flag incidents and I am happy to question anything the UK government tells me is true as they have lied so often in the past. I have seen the results of many bomb attacks having lived through the IRA bombing campaign and the pictures from that arena looked nothing like the pictures of those bombings so even at that basic level questions needed to be asked. I thought we had all learned from "Dirty Dancing" not to just assume one type of people are innocents abroad while others are obviously guilty and that we are not permitted to question that assumption without baby being ousted from her own family or .......... sent to the corner as it seems you want to do to Richard.
Sorry you've got it wrong John, Richard D Hall is not a real journalist, he's a faker. His conclusion abou the Manchester Arena attack after so much 'investigative journalism' is utter nonsense. To say nobody died, when we know 22 died that night, is simply ridiculous. We heard from their families these past seven years. They're not lying. To say there was no bomb, when those who were killed and wounded sustained their injuries from a crudely made nuts and bolts bomb, is more nonsense. Incredible how many people he's tricked with his phoney investigations. If he was in a newsroom (at least in my day) the editor would have sent him packing, flimsy 'evidence', doesn't pass the most basic tests. This has exposed some very serious issues with 'our side' believing things that aren't true. I'm stunned.
You are wasting your time. Others have actually examined the evidence. Only the gullible and lazy will pay attention to your ignorance of the facts.
https://www.podbean.com/site/EpisodeDownload/PB16C0C0FYFQUN This may help.
I've seen Richard Hall's documentary on the Manchester bombing. The evidence he compiles is not simply compelling but conclusive. The evidence backing the official narrative is ... missing.
Iain Davis of Pseudopandemic fame has followed up this investigation with a new book about it. Looking forward to reading it. Just saying.
I grew up through the 'Troubles' in the north of Ireland & know what the aftermath of bombings really looks like.
When I saw images of the Manchester bombing it looked nothing like the aftermath of a real bombing. I said so at the time & was condemned for being 'insensitive'.
We were expected to believe there was a major terrorist incident without any photographic evidence. Just take it on trust because the state & their media are telling you.
Aisling O’Loughlin argues there was a list of the dead. How can that be faked?
This from someone who believes that governments & health professionals conspired massively during Covid pandemic to kill millions worldwide & rob even more of their most basic rights. Yet they wouldn’t be capable of faking a relatively small terrorist incident in Manchester. Gimme a break!
Richard d hall has investigated this event more than Aisling O’Loughlin obviously has & anyone commenting on here has. I just wish those naysayers would do the decent thing; watch his film & read his book.
If you grew up in the North Willie, you'll know well there are different types of bombs with different types of impacts. I've listened to the families of the victims speak. They're not lying. People died. There was a bomb blast and Martin Hibbert and his daughter Eve are in wheelchairs as a result of the home-made nuts and bolts bomb. They were there. They're not lying. Conman Richard D Hall has tricked you into picking on a guy and his daughter in wheelchairs who are trying to get their lives back on track after a bomb blast. It's kind of sick how he's manipulated people into behaving so badly. You've been played.
No due diligence. Shame on you.
I don't know anything about this case at all but there are people who are actively conspiring with large groups of people to lead sheep to the slaughter. There might be an element of truth of what both sides are saying but you must weigh the lies as well. https://youtu.be/VwdkeQD6ii0?feature=shared... Sandy Hook, 9/11 Timothy McVeigh, JFK, Batman Shooter, LasVegas, The fact is the media along with vested interests are leading people to hate and fear one another. Throwing us towards trusting their lying science and leading us towards their divisions
I have just read Iain’s book and it’s a great follow-up to Richard’s own.
I watched the documentary, more like a mockumentary. He's making shit up and passing it off as 'investigative journalism'. It's really bad Simon. I'm sorry to burst your balloon. There was a bomb blast and real people were murdered and injured that night in Manchester, May 22, 2017. You do the victims a great disservice when you believe the lies of a conman.
Richard D Hall is not a con man.
If you had suggested he was mistaken in this instance I would give you more credibility. But the fact that you have descended to such personal abuse says a lot about your character. The fact that Hall is a friend of your bete noir Gemma O’Docherty may be a contributing factor to this poison you are spreading about him.
Either way it speaks very poorly of you.
You are a lazy parrot. You have not examined the evidence.
The only argument I have against Richard D. Hall is in his attempt to disprove the Manchester Arena incident in the Combine's own courts. He is fighting on their ground not his. And the result is a foregone conclusion.
That said he is absolutely correct in his analysis of what happened or didn't happen that day. His research is irrefutable. That's all that matters to me. I don't care what the mainstream media say about it, or how that makes 'our side' look. The truth is what is important here. And Richard D. Hall has never shied away from it. God bless him.
Oh dear. He's tricked so many of you! Let me assure you his research is far from 'irrefutable'. I believe the victims of the Manchester Arena attack, those who survived to tell the tale. They're not lying. Martin Hibbert and his daughter are really in wheelchairs. They didn't get their injuries elsewhere. You've been grossly misled.
This is very dangerous logic that Aisling O’Loughlin is advancing here. I wonder why she is promoting it.
Put simply it is if you are to challenge the state narrative keep it believable, keep it small. Don’t frighten the NPCs with any major claims - even though they can be substantiated - otherwise the state will use this to blacken any opposition & to introduce totalitarian restrictions on free speech.
So we are to tiptoe around like church mice for fear of being seen by the general population as conspiracy nuts.
This is one good way to keep us all in our boxes.
This comes in the wake of the greatest state conspiracy we have seen in our life times - the Covid plandemic - where millions have died from lockdowns, withdrawal of health care & a toxic drug being forced on them.
Aisling O’Loughlin’s logic argument could be used to negate the entire case exposing the Covid fraud.
Should we have kept quiet about Covid because in the view of many of the mainstream public (‘Normies I believe you call them) to claim this was a ‘conspiracy’ by governments & health professionals around the world is just completely ridiculous & does the cause of truth great damage?
Read Richard D Hall’s book & watch his film , Ms O’Loughlin, before rushing to this ridiculous judgement. He can back up all his claims. Is that not what any good journalist should do?
No Willie I'm just pointing out the lies. Very sad to see so many people hoovering up the lies and repeating them as Truth, a very sorry state of affairs. Richard D Hall's 'evidence' is makey uppy nonsense. It doesn't hold water. It's been fabricated to misguide and make you look stupid. It's worked. You now think nobody died in Manchester on the night of May 22, 2017. He's really done a number on you. I know it's embarrassing to admit you've been conned but YOU'VE BEEN CONNED. And yes there are false flags and all that and yes all those 22s but to conclude nobody died is just embarrassingly stupid.
You have know idea what is true and false. You don’t care. You are protecting the child trafficking bastards because you are scared to go in the room and see the elephant. Thank goodness so many are calling you out and so few are in love with NWO propaganda as you are.
Richard’s work is outstanding, backed with evidence ir often (for the official narrative) a lack of it. Not just for Manchester but for many other false flag attacks.
Iain Davies’ new book also highlights the fact there is zero evidence anyone died in the Manchester ‘bombing’
I get your point that what is being done here, namely the perception that some lunatic conspiracy theorist thinks it was a hoax when it wasn’t (official narrative) but if anyone has seen the sham inquiry, which most shouting loudest won’t have seen, it is so obviously a cover up.
But Jamie Richard D Hall's conclusion that nobody was killed and there was no bomb and it was all a drill is utter nonsense. Do you actually believe that? If you do, it's time for a reassessment. You've been conned. Richard's work is far from 'outstanding'. It's riddled with holes, inconsistencies and contradictions. Do yourself a favour and stop believing lies. Discernment is going to be very important in the coming months. Know your enemy.
Five days ago and nothing. She's a gatekeeper.
I think you may have got this one wrong. I've read Hall's book, and also the excellent Substack by a superb researcher Iain Davis on the background story and a daily witness account of Hall's trial. The whole thing stinks. These possible false flags are a minefield for the non specialist, and I wouldn't dream of giving a definitive opinion one way or the other. Just the old adage, qui bono? Certainly, Gemma's involvement is not helpful to Hall's case.
As for Iain Davis, he's just repeating Richard D Hall's manipulated 'evidence' and doesn't seem to realise he's been played.
All waffle. You will never address any of the copious evidence. You will never look at the copious evidence. I can’t tell your motives but I suspect it is a mixture of fear and laziness.
No I'm right on this Dr McCloskey. I've done my research. He's a fraud and he's misled thousands of good people into a very dark place and made them believe absurdities while ruining the reputation of honest 'conspiracy theorists'. The victims are not actors. There was a bomb in the Manchester Arena that night, whether it was some kind of false flag or not is another matter.
Please view:
https://rumble.com/v5deq2t-richard-d-halls-outrageous-investigative-journalism.html
https://rumble.com/v5dgir9-richard-d-hall-fake-investigative-journalist.html
https://rumble.com/v5dhc45-richard-d-hall-phoney-investigative-journalism-for-the-easily-manipulated.html
He's clearly conned a lot of people. Those are just some examples. He's adept at twisting information to make it sound like 'investigative journalism'. Any newsroom editor would send you packing if you turned up with his 'evidence', at least in my day. He's manipulating info. Wouldn't be surprised if there's a team behind him. This isn't just about Gemma O'Doherty's involvement although it set off alarm bells as she plays the same tricks. I was certainly suspicious when she started goading the alt media into supporting Richard D Hall, the best 'investigative false flag journalist out there' - sorry to break the news, he's job is to mislead. He's not on our side and neither is Gemma O'Doherty.
I like a lot of his work and he seems like a decent man, but I was completly taken aback by this when he came out with it. Either he lost the run of himself, or like so many of the UK Truther scene refuses to believe any kind of Jihad is real and every attack is a false flag. Also some of the worst horrors of the attack were covered up. This included terrified and traumatised teen girls being sexually assulted by Taxi Drivers of Peace while they were trying to get home in the fear and confusion. This is well known in Manchester but was all covered up. Then there was the sick Manchester One concert literally dancing on the grave of the murdered kids. It was sordid and Liam Gallagher in his orange jacket keeping and all the NPCs and Normies happy. Morrissey is the only one who called all that carry on out.
Poor decision and poor taste and he is going to pay a massive price for it. A classic example of choose your topics wisely if you can. It's a sad story on every level. This world is a dark place.
Finally a comment that gets it! Great insights as always Thomas, thank you. Imagine believing nobody was killed in that bomb blast and being convinced to pick on a Dad and a daughter in wheelchairs. D Hall's 'evidence' is fantasy land. I'm shocked by the levels of gullibility in the so-called 'awake' community. Fast asleep at the wheel, more like.
Finally another lazy gullible fool who has not looked at the evidence. Neither of you can alter reality. Both of you enable the control grid.
You silly tit.
You have clearly not looked at this at all.
Richard D is good friend of Gemma O'Doherty. I was surprised at this. I put it down to him not being in touch with affairs in Ireland. I wrote to him with some of Aislings material on O'Doherty. I don't think it changed his mind.
I've followed Richard D's work for years. If he's a state agent then we all are.
We're all allowed to get it wrong once in a while like Aisling does here I believe with Richard D.
Its when it becomes a pattern there's a problem.
They're similar operations. They cross-promote. If people truly cared about the Truth they'd detect all the lies but sadly people have drifted very very far from God.
I agree-Gemma is poisonous, and probably worse.
Have you actually read & watched all of Richard’s work on the Manchester event? It doesn’t sound like you have in this article
Also have you read any of Iain Davies subsequent work on the event and on Richard’s show trial? Iain was on the Delingpod last week.
I don’t completely discount that Richard might be an intelligence asset playing a role but I don’t think you have depicted his analysis of the Manchester event accurately in this piece because there is a ton of evidence that proves this was a faked event, the fact he wasn’t allowed to present any of it in court is a big clue on its own!
Yes I've studied Richard D Hall. He's not a real investigative journalist. He's certainly not working alone. He's completely flooded the zone with his fake conspiracy stuff to make our side look bad. UFOs to boot and all that fake space crap. It's clearly a set up. Looks like he's put a spell on people, they're actually believing his nonsense and think nobody was injured that night in Manchester. That's a bit thick, am I right?
I believe nothing ever. Belief is insane. It is you that believes. Some of us go by reality, evidence, which you point blank refuse to examine.
There is not one single point Richard raises that you can offer any rebuttal to.
Belief is the problem. Belief is often a result of school damage or parental indoctrination, and it is a blight on the development of intellect.
My father had an old saying. "Don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see" . As a child I didn't understand it but now I do.
Richard D Hall has that very same motto........
Seriously, there is no way that Richards incredible investigation is fake. Then of course Ian Davis has also conducted his own. Is Aisling the actual red herring here? You know from the same institution as Marianna Spring?!
Ok if Richard D Hall's 'incredible investigation' is not fake then are the 22 victims from the bombing just pretending to be dead? You can't have it both ways. Is Martin Hibbert just pretending to be in a wheelchair like his daughter? Do you really believe they sustained their injuries elsewhere. Give your head a wobble for goodness sake! You're letting down all the people who rely on real evidence to win arguments. You're buying into nonsense. You've been had. Take it on the chin and learn your lesson.
You know NOTHING about this.
Well done, it’s the signature hallmark all over of a set up.
Our lot have to work their favouritism & fam girl boy ing at every step.
I thought I was beyond it a few yrs now and then got burnt with Michael McNamara with his abrupt volte face.
But he stayed normal acting for long years until his vote when he joined the main party and backed everything he said he decried.
Every time someone does something incredulous… well it’s credulous. It’s exactly as it looks. Not stupid pple don’t do stupid things. Hence they’ve got game and they’re doing it intentionally.
Don’t give second chances.
The Donegal artist was another plausable one. Then he does this bs made up story and uses the Freemason word to show in k on me of you “token” dropped anywhere in convo, even I’m NOT token.. is token.
Then it’s like oh yeah… multi millionaire the media loved who did a load of creepy occult art, backstory of hating the church (useful to shape occult operatives etc)
I’m not saying go church here at ALL, they did abuse and subjugate and did some good stuff too.
But it’s a modus operandi to further go back and recruit these kids I’ve noticed now.
Anyways sounds tangential but we gotta be discerning and step up OURSELVES. Don’t rely on any “hero’s”
In saying that, I appreciate you and your work, standing along side us, no ego there and you’ve never put a foot wrong.
You spoke about masons & occult stuff from the get go too.
Thanks !
Ultimately this will be the people saying no and turning back to the Truth/God. That's where we're headed. Thank you Sara.
Aisling is correct saying that this is all about destroying the reputation of 'conspiracy theorists'. The mainstream media presstitutes are labelling anyone with a different view to them as a pusher of 'misinformation'.
We look nuts when we say nobody died that night in Manchester when clearly they did. Or that there was no bomb when there's Martin Hibbert in his wheelchair, legs gone skinny from lack of use. And we've heard all the other victims' stories. They're not lying. We look cruel and untrustworthy. Richard D Hall has deceived his audience, all on purpose. Another phoney investigative journalist tricking his viewers into false conclusions. We pay a heavy price when we don't use our God-given discernment.
What is this "our side" meme?
Taking sides is one sure way of being herded into 'consensus' and then steered back into 'belief'. Belief say, in an official narrative which is patently unbelievable.
Certainly seems that that is the plot, one way or another. Is it all distraction though? Given what is going on on the international front.
Consider this. We've learned all about the victims. We've heard from their mothers and fathers. We've sat through the inquiry. We've heard about the security that night. We know the details and yet Richard D Hall has convinced his gullible followers that nobody died and there was no bomb blast. Most people on Telegram went crazy with me for pointing out 22 people did, in fact, die that night and there were injuries consistent with a nuts and bolts homemade bomb. They'd bought into the lie and couldn't work their way back. We need to be operating on a much higher level than this if we're to make it through this onslaught. We can't keep falling for every counterintelligence trick thrown our way. We've got to love love love the Truth!
Another who has not examined the evidence.
If Sky News reported all those people as dying in the Manchester bomb then it must true.
Deary me.
Go check for yourself Willie. They're dead. Cop on.
I wouldn't make a massive issue with this to be honest. This *might* be being used as a distraction to more looming problems, for example the international situation, the WHO 'plandemic treaty' etc (you want to know about treaties, ask Native Americans or The Maori). Y'all gotta focus on the bigger picture, the little things, and this is a little thing despite the drama around it, will sort itself out, either way!
Weeding out traitors is about the most important job there is during a war. This article has exposed our weaknesses in believing counterintelligence baloney and declaring it's incredible 'investigative journalism' when it's no such thing. Anybody who thinks nobody died that night and who thinks it's ok to pick on a father and daughter in wheelchairs has been played cruelly. Let it be a lesson to use our own God given intelligence to figure things out in the future and to have the ability to spot fakers who pretend to be on 'our side' while leading us on a merry dance.
Exactly Aisling. As I have said before, I treat everything as a psy op until circumstances prove otherwise. We all have to be more pro-active and do our own thinking rather than having it conveniently laid out for us by the likes of RTE and the BBC. Alas, most people prefer the latter.
Have you watched every interview by the actors? Have you watched the parents of the man killed by 22 bits of shrapnel? The action g is hilarious, I wish I could post it. The father states, and this is less than 48 hours after he was blown to bits. “ he would have loved to seen the messages, he has made it, stardom… he’s up there now laughing… enjoying every moment. The father… “ I would love to die having all that love… he loves being there, he really enjoyed himself, he was doing selfies before he died!!
This is top class acting!! Nobody died, at 22:30 on the 22nd, by a 22 year old man on the 22 anniversary of the opening.
HOWEVER, the original investigation and all of Halls evidence is by a YT named UK critical Thinker, a lad from Manchester. He suggests that 22 is a special ops team 22 squadron, a strategy of tension, as in 22nd Brussels airport, 22nd Lee Rigby, Munich, London all 2nd. Was hall set up? Why did hall wear a black white check tie at the court trial? Why so UK critical thinker not mentioned?
Madeline mCanne did not exist- she is like the woman in the water who disappeared and Lucy Letby 33 who ‘ killed all those babies. Tv doctor MM who disappeared into the heat and died. Stage stage stage.