10 Comments
User's avatar
Kevin K's avatar

If the moon is made of plasma then how does it have craters on it?

Expand full comment
Josh's avatar

Not craters. Stop looking at CGI video or photoshopped images of the moon. There are too many different types of gases between us and the moon to confirm what the moon actually is. I believe Foster was on to the “Global” Lie and B.S. so he was quickly silenced and completely erased along with his credentials along with anyone who simply passed him on the street. U.N. made sure there r was no evidence of his existence whatsoever.

Expand full comment
Proton Magic's avatar

AL did a good investigation on Foster but your comment is just about the only rational thing said about the silly plasma (=gas) story which is propaganda to discredit the moon landing deniers coming soon and who were right, there was no moon landing. Here, the moon in 1795 painting looked just like it looks now, if it was a plasma gas it would not look the same and a painting in 1795 wasn't CG or a hologram.

https://www.themagazineantiques.com/article/john-russell-a-moon-with-a-view/

Expand full comment
Joe Valenzuela's avatar

We used to go camping a lot before a lot of times the moon will be so bright I would setup a telescope and just look at it till my eyes starts to hurt from looking through the telescope and I also started to see the stars thru the moon. I tend to just ignore the latter thinking it’s what it does to my eyes because I’m staring at the moon for too long so my dad tells me. After watching this clip I want to stare at the moon again till I see through it and this time I will record it.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

He has such a strong accent that the chances of his name being Robert Foster are close to zero.

Expand full comment
Proton Magic's avatar

Richard Foster Flint's bio reads like a typical scientist spook. The plasma guy may be him but he is smirking and clearly making a propaganda vid. As we can look at the moon with binoculars or small scopes, we can see craters and ridges proving it is solid. The silly "Plasma Moon" idea is propaganda aimed at discrediting those who in 4 years will be moon landing deniers who would be correct and thus would also be labeled as silly (and still are labeled as such). This propaganda also makes a part of the masses believe in any silly thing, like you need to twist a swab coated with disinfectant and who knows what up your nose near your brain to check for something in your lungs that would be in your spit.

Expand full comment
𝐃𝐮𝐕𝐀𝐘 𝐊𝐍𝐎𝐗's avatar

MOON=PLASMA. Agreed. SUN, too. The PHENOMENA surrounding both these SATELLITES makes it plain.

Expand full comment
David Quinn's avatar

Interesting article Aisling. Clearly something bogey albout Mr foster. Who knows what the moon is made of but regardless it is pretty easy to disprove the ridiculous theory of gravity that they came up with to hold their pathetic spinning ball lie together. I am starting to think that the best way to wake the most amount of people up quickly would be to expose the heliocentric model for the joke it is. In a way I think it would also be the easiest as it can be done using simple logic and basic observational skills unlike exposing most of the other scams which require looking into the history books and secondary sources which get more and more muddied over time and people have little interest in.

Expand full comment
Dawn's avatar

So good to find you in my search for this Prof Foster gentleman. Currently writing on whether Parallel Cities are even possible and went down a rabbit hole, as usual. I intend to tie in a bit of geocentricity in this piece. Your writing style is lovely.

Expand full comment