18 Comments

It's great to have another reputable investigative journalist/alternative media person, like Nick Cotton, not siding with Richard D Hall!

Expand full comment
author

The good thing about Nick is he is not making his videos to be popular, he's making them because it's the right thing to do. I admire a journalist who doesn't give a hoot about gaining likes and traction. That shows spirit and we need those high moral values to negotiate our way out of this mess. He raises some valid points in James Delingpole is Very Stupid and Not a Christian.

Expand full comment

Don't really see the point of having this chap Nick Cotton on when in the first two minutes he admits to "knowing nothing of the detail" ...This whole debate comes down to detail...Whether it's the detail of the 22 dead or a merchandise stand staying intact etc..

You were very brave in having Iain Davies on and a meaningful discussion was engaged in...But this is now becoming farcical !

Expand full comment

The crucial test of a critical thinker is how they respond to challenges to their beliefs, the most common and egregious failure of the test being a lack of response - your favoured response, Aisling. You still haven't responded to these challenges:

--- the lack of credibility of Adam Lawler's testimony, eg, "eye was almost destroyed" but turned out he only needed a "cataract operation" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGdjSq6i8uo

--- images of children in hospital beds showing zero signs of injury while we are told by paediatric orthopaedic surgeon, Dr Ibrar Majid, that there were "wounds from a battlefield". Contradictions between show and tell are very common in psyops.

CHILDREN IN HOSPITAL BEDS SHOWING ZERO SIGN OF INJURY:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4541026/The-Queen-visits-Royal-Manchester-Children-s-Hospital.html

DR IBRAR MAJID SAYING: "WHAT WE SAW WAS ESSENTIALLY WAR WOUNDS SO THE KINDS OF WOUNDS YOU WOULD SEE ON A BATTLEFIELD."

http://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-40125302/manchester-attack-lead-children-s-surgeon-angry

You are simply immune to reason and wedded to the belief that staged events are not a thing despite evidence of their occurrence since at least Ancient Rome. It's kind of scary to see someone so blatantly incapable of reasoning.

Expand full comment

Still no evidence presented.

Expand full comment

Aisling, why don't you interview Mariana Spring? You seem to have a lot in common.

Expand full comment
author
Sep 27·edited Sep 27Author

That's the trap you've fallen into - if the mainstream media are bad then Tricky Dicky is good. WRONG. They're both gearing towards the same end goal. Richard D Hall gives Marianna Spring plenty of ammunition to shoot US! He's a fraud and she's right to ask: 'Do disaster trolls believe the conspiracy theories they promote?' RDH knows he's pumping out carefully constructed nonsense but he's doing it on purpose to con the easily manipulated who have low moral standards. And quite frankly they deserve to be conned at this point.

Expand full comment

I think all this is distraction, ALL of it. Diddy being thrown under the bus, cowardly politicians and all this other fluff, is just to distract us from the elephant in the room; https://davidicke.com/2024/09/24/reporting-from-the-summit-of-the-future-in-nyc/ I think journalists, main stream and independent are being distracted by fluff and nonsense and the bickering that is going on is just what the PTB operatives and their controllers want.

Expand full comment
author

This moment in history is test of our morals. It's biblical. Do we allow ourselves to be deceived or not? Do we shrug our shoulders when parents are falsely accused of being implicated in the death of their child with ZERO evidence? Are we ok with that? Are we good with lies? Do we repeat them as truth? The whole thing is a test. This is not a distraction. There's an endless supply of news stories to focus on. It never ends. But ultimately this is about the individual and what we accept and tolerate. Free speech means debate and discussion. Let the best argument win. If you want everyone to agree with each other, choose totalitarianism. Democracy means we disagree sometimes and gives us an opportunity to root out the fraudsters, if we have the moral gumption for the task. It's not the popular route but it's a necessary one. This is a refining process.

Expand full comment

I would agree there is a 'test' element to it all and that element is how we use our discretion to see through the 'fluff' of the constant psy ops that are put there to distract, frighten and mislead us.

Expand full comment
author

The Manchester Arena victims are real.

Expand full comment

Absolutely possible! I wasn't there myself, so I can only go on what others say.

Expand full comment

Everyone Must Check In

Expand full comment

It might be worth interviewing Ole Dammegard.....he might be a better option.

Expand full comment
author

Yeah the 'expert' who claims there's a travelling theatre company on tour performing false flags with its own marketing and catering crew. What a joke. I'm stunned by the amount of people falling for this tripe. https://rumble.com/v5dzx31-sit-back-and-relax-its-just-a-movie.-save-your-tears-except-its-not..html

Expand full comment

I don't get why you are so upset by this....and why you feel the need to insult everyone in the process. That is not objectivity and besides are you really stunned? You know how divided this world is.....Ole said there are three kinds of false flags....you need to also do your due diligence and interview the guy not some ex bar tender who now calls himself a journalist. I like you and follow you but you are not listening to your followers and insulting them to boot.

Expand full comment
author

I'm making my way through Nick Cotton's videos. They're very interesting and worth the time because they expose the issue with phoneys and conmen pretending to be on 'our side'. He's providing factual information, not speculation or hypotheses. This is really important. Ole's claim of the travelling false flag troupe is hot air - his 'source' told him kind of nonsense that falls apart on closer inspection. It simply wouldn't wash in the real world of news reporting (in an old school newsroom at least). We've got to be careful with this speculative stuff - it's leading people to jump to all sorts of conclusions that are incorrect and in some cases, very dark. If you think I'm being rude, I'm metaphorically grabbing you by the lapels and saying, 'For the love of God! Can't you see he's misleading you!'.

Expand full comment
Sep 25Liked by Aisling O'Loughlin

For the love of God is why we uncover this evil. I don't have any skin the Manchester Arena bombing debate. As far as I am concerned it is all a big circus with real and made up victims. We are differing on what is real and what is made up. I follow my instincts and they tell me what they tell me and over the years I have learned to trust this. I am not a reporter so I cannot claim to get to the truth of anything. If people were hurt and died they are in God's hands as are we all and God bless their souls.

Expand full comment