Why is journalist James Delingpole acting so weird, pretending he doesn't know about RDH's theory that accuses Saffie Roussos' parents of covering up her death by using a hoax bomb?
You see, I wasn't there, so I can not say either way. We all know the State uses 'crisis actors' and the evidence is clear, but which events are fake and which are real? Does it matter? Its all distraction to draw people's attention away from what is going on behind the scenes. https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/sons-of-liberty?publication_id=746475&post_id=151556485&isFreemail=true&r=1je905&triedRedirect=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email We absolutely must not allow ourselves to become distracted, that is what they did with the covid scam, it was all distraction, all smoke and mirrors! Do not become embroiled in any of it, look to yourselves and keep on prepping, use common sense and due diligence, er, that's it!
Hi Diane, I assure you this isn't a distraction because it ties right into the child stabbings at Southport and the child stabbings in Parnell Square in Dublin, both dismissed as false flags. I'm not satisfied with those conclusions. I sense there's more to the story. I also sense that the conspiratorial gang are being misled by these false flag experts to reach the wrong conclusion. I'm sensing it's a war strategy to deactivate appropriate responses. I think Ole Dammegard is full of nonsense, for example, and everyone repeats him, which is troubling. So it's really not a distraction. Not exactly popular work but who cares! Kind of vital that we figure this out and detect suspicious behaviour. I've loads more topics I want to cover too. The bulk of the Manchester Arena bombing research is complete. It's crystal clear to me RDH has deliberately misled his audience at the expense of the real victims of the blast. Extraordinary. If we go on treating victims like this, without sufficient evidence to support the claim they're crisis actors, we'll be in a very dark place indeed. Standards ensure we don't go there.
Excellent reporting. Delingpole raised my suspicions about himself months ago when he smeared David Icke (one of my hereos, despite his being controversial) in part because Icke is not "Christian." Icke had been on Delingpole's podcast, I believe. Weird.
if you wish to learn more about christianity and the special pineal gland oil,called 'christus' and how it travels down the spine past the 33 vertabrae to the sacrum,once a month,and remains there while being purified for 3 days(and 3 nights) before it rises (from the dead) to the pineal gland. look up 'Santos Bonacci'
Oh yes, loves a bit of Santos although he went a bit cracked there recently. Think he might have been on something and made some very peculiar recordings, which is never a good idea!
Hi Katherine, I'm beginning to wonder if Delingpole is really a Christian - right now he's looking about as christian as Russell Brand! Yes, David Icke is a legend. He's still battling it out bravely on X. Wonder how long they'll let him get the word out.
There is a side of him I quite like. But, I have had some communications with him and I have detected some kind of sensitivity, even a passive aggressiveness. He also offers no solutions to any of the trials we are [supposedly] going through.
Aisling. Knowing so little it would be irresponsible if I were to comment. But good onya for enquiring into an unexplained death and staying with it. Work like that is tough and is rarely acknowledged.
"Aisling. Knowing so little it would be irresponsible if I were to comment. But good onya for enquiring into an unexplained death and staying with it. Work like that is tough and is rarely acknowledged."
It's very peculiar Catherine. I've got to get to the bottom of it! Something is clearly amiss here. The treatment of the Manchester Arena victims has been appalling - I've never witnessed anything like it in all my years. So many have been convinced to treat them like the enemy. Why is Delingpole pretending he doesn't know about RDH's absurd theory on Saffie Roussos? He's a proper journalist - it's his job to understand what he's defending. It's beyond disgusting that he thinks it's ok to treat the Roussos family like this. Something stinks.
If only you knew how ridiculous that sounds. Sorry but Richard D Hall's 'findings' were fed to you so you'd reach the wrong conclusion and sound bananas, which you do. Time to recalibrate.
Not ridiculous at all Aisling. If there was no bomb, there were no victims ( obviously ) Your stance seems to be there were victims so there must have been a bomb. You're not prepared to get involved with proving YOUR supposition whilst at least RDH has made the effort. RDH was a truther when you were still mainstream so your ad hominem comments are pathetic.
You see, I wasn't there, so I can not say either way. We all know the State uses 'crisis actors' and the evidence is clear, but which events are fake and which are real? Does it matter? Its all distraction to draw people's attention away from what is going on behind the scenes. https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/sons-of-liberty?publication_id=746475&post_id=151556485&isFreemail=true&r=1je905&triedRedirect=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email We absolutely must not allow ourselves to become distracted, that is what they did with the covid scam, it was all distraction, all smoke and mirrors! Do not become embroiled in any of it, look to yourselves and keep on prepping, use common sense and due diligence, er, that's it!
Hi Diane, I assure you this isn't a distraction because it ties right into the child stabbings at Southport and the child stabbings in Parnell Square in Dublin, both dismissed as false flags. I'm not satisfied with those conclusions. I sense there's more to the story. I also sense that the conspiratorial gang are being misled by these false flag experts to reach the wrong conclusion. I'm sensing it's a war strategy to deactivate appropriate responses. I think Ole Dammegard is full of nonsense, for example, and everyone repeats him, which is troubling. So it's really not a distraction. Not exactly popular work but who cares! Kind of vital that we figure this out and detect suspicious behaviour. I've loads more topics I want to cover too. The bulk of the Manchester Arena bombing research is complete. It's crystal clear to me RDH has deliberately misled his audience at the expense of the real victims of the blast. Extraordinary. If we go on treating victims like this, without sufficient evidence to support the claim they're crisis actors, we'll be in a very dark place indeed. Standards ensure we don't go there.
Conspiritorial gang !!!!
Excellent reporting. Delingpole raised my suspicions about himself months ago when he smeared David Icke (one of my hereos, despite his being controversial) in part because Icke is not "Christian." Icke had been on Delingpole's podcast, I believe. Weird.
if you wish to learn more about christianity and the special pineal gland oil,called 'christus' and how it travels down the spine past the 33 vertabrae to the sacrum,once a month,and remains there while being purified for 3 days(and 3 nights) before it rises (from the dead) to the pineal gland. look up 'Santos Bonacci'
Oh yes, loves a bit of Santos although he went a bit cracked there recently. Think he might have been on something and made some very peculiar recordings, which is never a good idea!
Hi Katherine, I'm beginning to wonder if Delingpole is really a Christian - right now he's looking about as christian as Russell Brand! Yes, David Icke is a legend. He's still battling it out bravely on X. Wonder how long they'll let him get the word out.
I think JD is beginning to grift at this stage, and that's a pity.
This Richard D Hall episode has raised my suspicions about his role - even the Christian thing. Detecting peculiar behaviour that's far from honest.
There is a side of him I quite like. But, I have had some communications with him and I have detected some kind of sensitivity, even a passive aggressiveness. He also offers no solutions to any of the trials we are [supposedly] going through.
Aisling. Knowing so little it would be irresponsible if I were to comment. But good onya for enquiring into an unexplained death and staying with it. Work like that is tough and is rarely acknowledged.
I remember well when I had to put up, FOR 16 YEARS, with a Trade Union and Government backed ban on being allowed work in a particular job. Thousands of us were left with little choice but jump on the Mail boat from Dun Laoghaire and try to get The Shtart , as it was called, on some site run by Wimpey ( We Import More Paddies Every Year) or, if you were lucky, become one of McAlpines Fusiliers. Here's the bould Ronnie Drew with the full details: https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=song%20macaplines%20fusil%20videos&FORM=VIRE0&mid=7DE28B5B77F9EB10A2567DE28B5B77F9EB10A256&view=detail&ru=%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dsong%20macaplines%20fusil
I appreciate what you wrote:
"Aisling. Knowing so little it would be irresponsible if I were to comment. But good onya for enquiring into an unexplained death and staying with it. Work like that is tough and is rarely acknowledged."
Seems suspicious but I think they all just want to stay in favour with R D Hall's fans
It's very peculiar Catherine. I've got to get to the bottom of it! Something is clearly amiss here. The treatment of the Manchester Arena victims has been appalling - I've never witnessed anything like it in all my years. So many have been convinced to treat them like the enemy. Why is Delingpole pretending he doesn't know about RDH's absurd theory on Saffie Roussos? He's a proper journalist - it's his job to understand what he's defending. It's beyond disgusting that he thinks it's ok to treat the Roussos family like this. Something stinks.
How many times Aisling? No bomb , no victims !!
If only you knew how ridiculous that sounds. Sorry but Richard D Hall's 'findings' were fed to you so you'd reach the wrong conclusion and sound bananas, which you do. Time to recalibrate.
Not ridiculous at all Aisling. If there was no bomb, there were no victims ( obviously ) Your stance seems to be there were victims so there must have been a bomb. You're not prepared to get involved with proving YOUR supposition whilst at least RDH has made the effort. RDH was a truther when you were still mainstream so your ad hominem comments are pathetic.