Do you ever get that sinking feeling we're being played from every angle with embedded gatekeepers managing our perceptions and tricking good people into bad behaviour?
Why do you put on that ridiculous voice Aisling when you're trying to mock those who believe the bomb was a hoax.? We all have differing opinions on this so the silly mocking voice is not a very good look for a proper INVESTIGATIVE journalist as you purport to be.
Mr Bickerstaff's inappropriate behaviour sticks out a mile, it is odd and it is suspicious. The sounds in the background are clearly people mimicking his specific and highly unusual lone cry.
It's not as odd and suspicious as it's being made out to be, in fairness. We use our camera phones all the time. People are constantly recording themselves. Nick Bickerstaff is being unfairly targetted here. The high pitched cry in the background tells us somebody is clearly in anguish. That's where the focus should be. No not everyone is reacting like that - because they're unaware of the situation. This video has been used as proof there was no bomb and no victims on the night. I'm saying the commentary around it has been deliberately misleading to encourage people to reach the wrong conclusion. I see a man who panicked. I don't blame him. Who knows how any of us would react if we'd seen blown up bodies? The fact remains, there's no proof to support the theory the victims are crisis actors. Internet speculation won't do (hedge trimming accident, car crashes, starter pistol). I'll remain open to new information but right now, there's zilch to support the thesis they were hired to perform for a hoax bomb. Has Nick Bickerstaff been wronged by people who were encouraged to mock him? That's where I'd be looking now because who wants to be part of that mob?
According to this article, Bickerstaff has a daughter called Ellen (the name of the person he's apparently looking for in the video) https://www.rhyljournal.co.uk/news/17636546.prestatyn-butcher-business-five-months-awarded-silver-steak/ . If this is correct, and if the bombing was a planned "faked" operation in which Bickerstaff had been tasked with making a video of himself panicking, why would he be pretending to look for his REAL daughter? I don't think that makes sense.
But he would. If he'd been shouting out a random name this would have been picked up by any checker straight away. They really wanted this to look like the real thing.
Aisling: "You MIGHT just click the camera of your mobile on when searching for your daughter" NO you wouldn't. I feel sorry for Aisling now. SHE'S TRYING SO HARD to rubbish RDH and using every trick in the handbook but it's not working. Her handlers will just have to find a more authentic voice to propagate their disinformation. She's done.
I like Aisling, the way she comes across., but the casual waving away of anomalies such as the above and other relevant points is surely not the way of proper investigation.
It would seem, from what I'm seeing on conservative social media, that The Trump spell is finally wearing off, imagine my surprise! Things are starting to go wrong for the net zero, NWO, WEF mob and as Gerald Celente says, ' when all else fails they take you to war'. Scott Ritter and many other seasoned commentators are saying something similar, the 'leaders' collective west(NATO) are insane enough to prod the nuclear armed Bear just one more time. The thing with bears, is that you can prod them quite a bit, but then they get annoyed and knock your head off, that is the point we are at now, the Russians have put up with no end of provocation, and they have already shown what they are capable of with basic, but accurate, kinetic weapon systems. Do western 'leaders'(ha bloody ha) not see that they are going to get us all killed or at least get every major city obliterated?
Ruth Morrell posted a picture of her leg with a wound on both sides, as if a sizeable object had gone right through it (more than just a piece of glass), yet her jeans clearly have no hole in them in the video. I don't see how an object that caused such a deep wound would leave no hole in the jeans. The only explanation would be if she'd changed her trousers but where would she get them from in the minutes after a blast?
The (totally inappropriate) One Love concert was organized with remarkable speed, which suggests it was part of a pre-planned propaganda spectacle. While I agree that deliberate disinfo has been put out (e.g. quite possibly Ruth Morrell's leg wound) to get people to jump on the conspiracy bandwagon, would the authorities be able to do such a speedy disinfo and propaganda operation for a bombing attack that took them completely by surprise and which they had no hand in or prior awareness of?
Why do you put on that ridiculous voice Aisling when you're trying to mock those who believe the bomb was a hoax.? We all have differing opinions on this so the silly mocking voice is not a very good look for a proper INVESTIGATIVE journalist as you purport to be.
Mr Bickerstaff's inappropriate behaviour sticks out a mile, it is odd and it is suspicious. The sounds in the background are clearly people mimicking his specific and highly unusual lone cry.
It's not as odd and suspicious as it's being made out to be, in fairness. We use our camera phones all the time. People are constantly recording themselves. Nick Bickerstaff is being unfairly targetted here. The high pitched cry in the background tells us somebody is clearly in anguish. That's where the focus should be. No not everyone is reacting like that - because they're unaware of the situation. This video has been used as proof there was no bomb and no victims on the night. I'm saying the commentary around it has been deliberately misleading to encourage people to reach the wrong conclusion. I see a man who panicked. I don't blame him. Who knows how any of us would react if we'd seen blown up bodies? The fact remains, there's no proof to support the theory the victims are crisis actors. Internet speculation won't do (hedge trimming accident, car crashes, starter pistol). I'll remain open to new information but right now, there's zilch to support the thesis they were hired to perform for a hoax bomb. Has Nick Bickerstaff been wronged by people who were encouraged to mock him? That's where I'd be looking now because who wants to be part of that mob?
According to this article, Bickerstaff has a daughter called Ellen (the name of the person he's apparently looking for in the video) https://www.rhyljournal.co.uk/news/17636546.prestatyn-butcher-business-five-months-awarded-silver-steak/ . If this is correct, and if the bombing was a planned "faked" operation in which Bickerstaff had been tasked with making a video of himself panicking, why would he be pretending to look for his REAL daughter? I don't think that makes sense.
It would be a bit odd if he was looking for a fictitious daughter wouldn' t it? They missed a trick there to muddy the waters though.
If he'd been put up to making a fake video as part of some planned operation, I don't think he would go looking for and naming his real daughter.
But he would. If he'd been shouting out a random name this would have been picked up by any checker straight away. They really wanted this to look like the real thing.
That would mean his daughter was part of the operation as well. I don't see enough need for a fake video for them to go to that length to create one.
Aisling: "You MIGHT just click the camera of your mobile on when searching for your daughter" NO you wouldn't. I feel sorry for Aisling now. SHE'S TRYING SO HARD to rubbish RDH and using every trick in the handbook but it's not working. Her handlers will just have to find a more authentic voice to propagate their disinformation. She's done.
I like Aisling, the way she comes across., but the casual waving away of anomalies such as the above and other relevant points is surely not the way of proper investigation.
I thought this to begin with but I think it's far from conclusive that he's pretending, or that this was filmed before the explosion occurred.
We're all entitled to our opinions. We just hold different ones. That's life!!
Happy to be listening and to be among desenters of disenters ...maybe t seed of the grassroots!
It would seem, from what I'm seeing on conservative social media, that The Trump spell is finally wearing off, imagine my surprise! Things are starting to go wrong for the net zero, NWO, WEF mob and as Gerald Celente says, ' when all else fails they take you to war'. Scott Ritter and many other seasoned commentators are saying something similar, the 'leaders' collective west(NATO) are insane enough to prod the nuclear armed Bear just one more time. The thing with bears, is that you can prod them quite a bit, but then they get annoyed and knock your head off, that is the point we are at now, the Russians have put up with no end of provocation, and they have already shown what they are capable of with basic, but accurate, kinetic weapon systems. Do western 'leaders'(ha bloody ha) not see that they are going to get us all killed or at least get every major city obliterated?
Ruth Morrell posted a picture of her leg with a wound on both sides, as if a sizeable object had gone right through it (more than just a piece of glass), yet her jeans clearly have no hole in them in the video. I don't see how an object that caused such a deep wound would leave no hole in the jeans. The only explanation would be if she'd changed her trousers but where would she get them from in the minutes after a blast?
The (totally inappropriate) One Love concert was organized with remarkable speed, which suggests it was part of a pre-planned propaganda spectacle. While I agree that deliberate disinfo has been put out (e.g. quite possibly Ruth Morrell's leg wound) to get people to jump on the conspiracy bandwagon, would the authorities be able to do such a speedy disinfo and propaganda operation for a bombing attack that took them completely by surprise and which they had no hand in or prior awareness of?