I agree with you on this. It is important. This brings to my mind the mask issue. I had not taken it seriously at first, back in 2020-2021 I thought, oh whatever, so maybe it doesn't really work, it's kind of weird to have to wear a mask, but whatever, it's not that big a deal, just to wear it in the grocery store, some people get so upset if you don't, OK. But then, bit by bit, I started to realize, no, actually, the mask is a A Very Big Deal. Because if you got fooled or cave on that, you've caved to a whole raft of godawful shale.
Yes the worst thing we can do is self-edit or comply because we convince ourselves it's no biggie. I used to walk through the market in France with no mask, every second person would scold me and tell me to put one one. It was relentless. If the cops were close by I'd stick it on just to walk past to avoid a fine and trouble. Bad times. Yes this is similar, seems unimportant but it matters. Well done for realising that the mask was a muzzle and a symbol of control and subjugation.
I don't blame you. If I was just going on Candace Owens, I'd be sold. She's so convincing. I lived in France for five years and foolishly said this out loud, that Brigitte Macron was probably a man. It was debunked wholesale over there - after that nobody believed me when I told them about vaccine dangers. It's a very powerful tool to undermine critical thinkers.
Who debunked Macron? The establishment run French mainstream media? Can you give us a list of what we can and can't trust them over please?
Thanks to you, we now know we can trust them on their narratives around high level transgender rumours, and bizarre bloodless stabbings on Parnell square, and unreliable junkie eyewitnesses that you give the nod to.
So what else are the mainstream media good for? Asking for my cronies, thanks. Educate us.
Aisling, I think you would have gotten the same pushback when you talked about the "vaccines" no matter what you'd said before. No matter who you are. Everyone who raised questions and/or objections to the jabs got slammed and smeared— including individuals who were highly published tenured faculty of important universities. I'm thinking of virologist Dr. Byram Bridle, epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch, medical ethicist Dr. Aaron Kheriaty-- so many people. It was flat-out kooky-- and all about befuddling people.
Amazing how they have weaponized a rare medical condition to turn society on it's head. None of this will help genuine gender dysphoric people gain understanding.
I usually like Miri AF, but this is taking the trans thing too far. Saying that Johnny Depp and Brad Pitt are women must be a way of giving trans men(really women)some confidence....The trans men I've seen are never handsome!🤣
I'm 100% agreeing with you on this one, Aisling. I do not think that the sexes of Brad and Angelina are inverted or many of the other people said to be such as Michelle Obama. On the other hand, I've heard from numerous sources who are "insiders" in various ways that Nicole Kidman was born intersex ... which isn't an inversion of sex and isn't all that uncommon. A girl in my class reached puberty early and unbeknownst to me at the time the reason was she was born intersex and needed hormonal treatment. I also knew someone who was born some kind of intersex whose doctor told him he had a 1 in a million chance of fathering a child ... but a couple of years after a casual relationship with a woman he got a phone call from her telling him he was the father of a two-year old daughter. Bit of a surprise!
I read years ago that people who are androgynous tend to be more beautiful and that is why we see more of these people in Hollywood so it could be that the intersex thing is more common among film stars but that's not gender inversion.
You need proof of these things, you can't just say people are gender-inverted without proof.
It's descended into farce Petra. You know I think Miri is great but we need to be able to call these things out and disagree, hopefully without falling out. It's how we strengthen our arguments. Interesting perspective on the intersex angle, also to be considered. I was only watching Nicole Kidman prancing around in her underwear on Eyes Wide Shut the other day, she looked all female, but maybe she was born intersex. As you say, we need proof to support any of these arguments. The whole transvestigations things on the Internet is out of control. They'll be saying we need to clamp down on conspiracy theorists and their false allegations next.
But intersex doesn't really mean that the person isn't really female or male exactly it just means that there's an anomaly of some kind which may not affect their outward appearance in any way. In some cases, the person seems 100% whatever sex they present as, at least, outwardly, whereas in other cases it's more ambiguous, eg, the Algerian boxer, Imane Khelif, does seem quite masculine. Then again people who aren't born intersex can still seem to have qualities of the other sex, eg, men who seem quite feminine and women who seem quite masculine.
The Mary Butler farrago serves as a convenient distraction from the debacle and destruction caused by Storm Eowan.
The Climate Change Scam has been blown out of the water.
The ability of people in Green approved Housing ,total dependent on electric power ,for heating cooking lighting etc, proves how dangerous this ideology is to survival of people.
No water, no phone charging , no communication, no TV, no fuel at Petrol stations,no credit card transactions. No charging of EV cars.
All dependent on electric power supply.
And of course no sign of an appearance of FF/FG/G.who are responsile for the mess ,by their short signedness and failures to do the basics of Risk assessments of power loss to communities of Ireland and a formulation of contingency plans.
These politicians are on their Jollies and I doubt if there is one among them who could even change a light bulb.
Storm Eowan came 6 weeks late , when it would have exposed these useless incompetent mediocracies as a worthless lot.
I imagine there are many FF/FG/SF Voters realising they were fooled again by these political charlatans and sufffering buyers remorse
I'm very interested in that side of things Daniel. I wonder is this part of the plan to drive people out of the countryside and into smart cities. Make the countryside too 'dangerous'.
So you're saying this Mary Butler story was designed by government to distract a few thousand people from the aftermath of the storm for ten or twenty minutes?
Sorry, how is it nonsense? It is important as far as I'm concerned because it shows how these lunatics are put in power. Look what he has done to mental health services in this country. It is hugely important, how can you say otherwise
These lunatics of F/G//G were put in power by a Nation of fuckwits, who are ill -informed by a captured and controlled Media.who have bamboozled them with BS and irrelevancies.
For Demoracy to flourish requires an educated ,informed, politically intelligent, educated Demos, (Plato).
Ireland has a docile ,gullible naive, braindead electorate , and a corrupted Electoral Register that has not been updated for decades ,containing dead, departed , and questionalble illegal entrants that makes the integrity of any Election dubious.
You are correct ,we are governed by lunatics and the majority of the Electorate have mental health issues and cannot differentiate between sheet and shinola.
May be something in the water causing cognitive deficiency.
Why mention I write under a pen-name if you're not threatening to doxx me? What a weird weird thing to write, unless you're subtly implying I need to shut up talking about things you don't want me talking about.
Anyone reading this stuff really needs to question why AOL went on a trans defending PR campaign the week before people like Mary Butler were about to be appointed to ministerial office. It was out of the blue and it was weird, and there was never any rational explanation as to why people wondering about their true gender suddenly became such an issue.
You have been warned folks. Something is not right here. Shame, a lovely woman otherwise.
Mary Butler is obviously a man in women's clothing. There has never been a more obvious transgender in public life ever, since...well, since Michelle Obama.
Edit: the pen name comment is actually beyond disgusting and seriously disappointing,
This is one of the funniest piles of shite I have ever read. Who is paying or telling you to cover for these weirdo people?
I also don't think the free press article took any issue with the trans child as you implied. Mary Butler looks and acts like a man, and everything she has done to mental services is as described. Whatever it is, he's fair game. He does look like a man, and Mick Barry said what he said.
And Michelle Obama and Brid macron are almost definitely men. More likely than not, you give us no evidence to the contrary. Just 'trust me' is all you've got.
This BS seemed to spring from an account that used some ridiculous 'facial structure mask overlay graphic' that implied that all males and females should have exactly 1 of 2 bone structures + head shapes .. which anyone with half a brain can see throughout society that bone structures+ head shapes & sizes vary considerably--whether male or female!!!!
Thank you for pointing this out Aisling, some of these conspiracies are absolutely ridiculous, and like you rightly say, give us a bad name.
I haven’t been able to trust Miri for some time now, ever since reading her post where she asserts that voting does make a difference, together with her admission of attempting to get onto the political ladder herself.
Women come in so many different shapes and sizes - all these tests put out on the Internet are bunkum, pseudoscience and most definitely not to be trusted. I've seen women with big feet, huge hands, snake hips, flat chests.. on it goes...still women. These investigations are quite sinister in nature and we should resist using them as proof of anything.
Hi Aisling! (Beautiful name by the way). I'm focusing dismorphism really more than body difference due to life style choices and family genetics, in other words, chromosomal, the dominance established between the X and Y chromosomes at conception. How come research seems to focus on exposure levels to hormones instead as an explanation? Don't really understand that yet. In any case I am neither a prosecuting nor defence attorney here,just looking. It may well be a load of bollocks,if so I think John should return all research monies received in the past towards the study of bollocks. Doing a great job Aisling.
John Manning is a British researcher well-known for his work on the 2D:4D ratio (the ratio of the length of the index finger to the ring finger) and its implications for sexual dimorphism and various psychological, behavioral, and health-related traits. His work has significantly contributed to the understanding of how finger length ratios might reflect prenatal hormone exposure and influence later-life characteristics.
Here are some key works by John Manning that delve into the finger proportionality differences between men and women:
1. Manning, J. T. (1995). The Finger Length Ratio: A Predictor of Sexual Orientation?
In this early paper, Manning explored the 2D:4D ratio as a potential predictor for various aspects of human development, including sexual orientation. He observed that males typically have a lower 2D:4D ratio (indicating a shorter index finger relative to the ring finger) than females, and speculated that this difference could be linked to the effects of prenatal testosterone.
2. Manning, J. T. (2002). The 2D:4D Ratio and the Prenatal Hormonal Environment.
This article provided a more detailed examination of the 2D:4D ratio, focusing on its relationship with prenatal hormone exposure, particularly the influence of testosterone and estrogen. Manning suggested that the lower the 2D:4D ratio, the higher the prenatal testosterone exposure. He found that, on average, men tend to have a lower 2D:4D ratio than women, which was interpreted as reflecting sex differences in the in-utero hormonal environment.
3. Manning, J. T., & Fink, B. (2008). Digit Ratio (2D:4D) and Testosterone Exposure and Use of Steroids in Women Athletes.
In this study, Manning and colleagues expanded on the connection between the 2D:4D ratio and athletic performance, particularly among female athletes. They found that women with a lower 2D:4D ratio (associated with higher prenatal testosterone) were more likely to use anabolic steroids, further linking the finger length ratio to hormonal influences and behaviors related to testosterone.
4. Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Wilson, J., & Lewis-Jones, D. I. (1998). The Ratio of 2nd to 4th Digit Length: A Predictor of Spermatogenic Impairment in Men.
This work by Manning and colleagues investigated the relationship between the 2D:4D ratio and male fertility. They found that a lower 2D:4D ratio (again, indicating higher prenatal testosterone exposure) was associated with better sperm quality and fertility, offering a biological explanation for why this ratio might be relevant in understanding male reproductive health.
5. Manning, J. T. (2008). Digit Ratio: A Pointer to Fertility, Behavior, and Health.
In this book, Manning synthesized much of his earlier research and provided an in-depth exploration of the 2D:4D ratio. He discussed how this ratio could be a reliable marker of prenatal testosterone exposure and linked it to various traits like sexual behavior, aggression, athletic ability, and even susceptibility to certain health conditions. The book presented compelling evidence that finger length differences between men and women are not merely cosmetic but may reflect deeper biological and behavioral patterns.
John Manning's research has shown that the 2D:4D ratio can be an insightful tool for understanding the physiological and behavioral differences between men and women, suggesting that the relative length of these fingers is influenced by hormonal factors during fetal development. While his studies have been groundbreaking, they also sparked debate and further research on the implications and reliability of the 2D:4D ratio in various fields.
I agree with you on this. It is important. This brings to my mind the mask issue. I had not taken it seriously at first, back in 2020-2021 I thought, oh whatever, so maybe it doesn't really work, it's kind of weird to have to wear a mask, but whatever, it's not that big a deal, just to wear it in the grocery store, some people get so upset if you don't, OK. But then, bit by bit, I started to realize, no, actually, the mask is a A Very Big Deal. Because if you got fooled or cave on that, you've caved to a whole raft of godawful shale.
Yes the worst thing we can do is self-edit or comply because we convince ourselves it's no biggie. I used to walk through the market in France with no mask, every second person would scold me and tell me to put one one. It was relentless. If the cops were close by I'd stick it on just to walk past to avoid a fine and trouble. Bad times. Yes this is similar, seems unimportant but it matters. Well done for realising that the mask was a muzzle and a symbol of control and subjugation.
Kudos to you for standing against the mask when it really counted. I know that was not easy, not at all.
I agree with you on all of this EXCEPT for Brigitte Macron... what Ive read about her/him? is really quite intriguing.
I don't blame you. If I was just going on Candace Owens, I'd be sold. She's so convincing. I lived in France for five years and foolishly said this out loud, that Brigitte Macron was probably a man. It was debunked wholesale over there - after that nobody believed me when I told them about vaccine dangers. It's a very powerful tool to undermine critical thinkers.
Who debunked Macron? The establishment run French mainstream media? Can you give us a list of what we can and can't trust them over please?
Thanks to you, we now know we can trust them on their narratives around high level transgender rumours, and bizarre bloodless stabbings on Parnell square, and unreliable junkie eyewitnesses that you give the nod to.
So what else are the mainstream media good for? Asking for my cronies, thanks. Educate us.
Aisling, I think you would have gotten the same pushback when you talked about the "vaccines" no matter what you'd said before. No matter who you are. Everyone who raised questions and/or objections to the jabs got slammed and smeared— including individuals who were highly published tenured faculty of important universities. I'm thinking of virologist Dr. Byram Bridle, epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch, medical ethicist Dr. Aaron Kheriaty-- so many people. It was flat-out kooky-- and all about befuddling people.
Brad Pitt is not a woman, just a big pussy
Oh dear , another one lost down the rabbit hole. Mind you ,she has always been borderline brilliant/nutcase ;)
Amazing how they have weaponized a rare medical condition to turn society on it's head. None of this will help genuine gender dysphoric people gain understanding.
Very true. It's actually evil when you see it play out.
I usually like Miri AF, but this is taking the trans thing too far. Saying that Johnny Depp and Brad Pitt are women must be a way of giving trans men(really women)some confidence....The trans men I've seen are never handsome!🤣
I'm 100% agreeing with you on this one, Aisling. I do not think that the sexes of Brad and Angelina are inverted or many of the other people said to be such as Michelle Obama. On the other hand, I've heard from numerous sources who are "insiders" in various ways that Nicole Kidman was born intersex ... which isn't an inversion of sex and isn't all that uncommon. A girl in my class reached puberty early and unbeknownst to me at the time the reason was she was born intersex and needed hormonal treatment. I also knew someone who was born some kind of intersex whose doctor told him he had a 1 in a million chance of fathering a child ... but a couple of years after a casual relationship with a woman he got a phone call from her telling him he was the father of a two-year old daughter. Bit of a surprise!
I read years ago that people who are androgynous tend to be more beautiful and that is why we see more of these people in Hollywood so it could be that the intersex thing is more common among film stars but that's not gender inversion.
You need proof of these things, you can't just say people are gender-inverted without proof.
It's descended into farce Petra. You know I think Miri is great but we need to be able to call these things out and disagree, hopefully without falling out. It's how we strengthen our arguments. Interesting perspective on the intersex angle, also to be considered. I was only watching Nicole Kidman prancing around in her underwear on Eyes Wide Shut the other day, she looked all female, but maybe she was born intersex. As you say, we need proof to support any of these arguments. The whole transvestigations things on the Internet is out of control. They'll be saying we need to clamp down on conspiracy theorists and their false allegations next.
But intersex doesn't really mean that the person isn't really female or male exactly it just means that there's an anomaly of some kind which may not affect their outward appearance in any way. In some cases, the person seems 100% whatever sex they present as, at least, outwardly, whereas in other cases it's more ambiguous, eg, the Algerian boxer, Imane Khelif, does seem quite masculine. Then again people who aren't born intersex can still seem to have qualities of the other sex, eg, men who seem quite feminine and women who seem quite masculine.
The Mary Butler farrago serves as a convenient distraction from the debacle and destruction caused by Storm Eowan.
The Climate Change Scam has been blown out of the water.
The ability of people in Green approved Housing ,total dependent on electric power ,for heating cooking lighting etc, proves how dangerous this ideology is to survival of people.
No water, no phone charging , no communication, no TV, no fuel at Petrol stations,no credit card transactions. No charging of EV cars.
All dependent on electric power supply.
And of course no sign of an appearance of FF/FG/G.who are responsile for the mess ,by their short signedness and failures to do the basics of Risk assessments of power loss to communities of Ireland and a formulation of contingency plans.
These politicians are on their Jollies and I doubt if there is one among them who could even change a light bulb.
Storm Eowan came 6 weeks late , when it would have exposed these useless incompetent mediocracies as a worthless lot.
I imagine there are many FF/FG/SF Voters realising they were fooled again by these political charlatans and sufffering buyers remorse
I'm very interested in that side of things Daniel. I wonder is this part of the plan to drive people out of the countryside and into smart cities. Make the countryside too 'dangerous'.
So you're saying this Mary Butler story was designed by government to distract a few thousand people from the aftermath of the storm for ten or twenty minutes?
Tell us more
No , This Govt of clowns are too stupid to create this distraction.
It is but tittle tattle fish-wife nonsense BS and gossip that is best treated with contempt derision and ignored.
Known as 'filler ' on a slow day in the Newsroom by journalists.
There are far too many other serious issues that require scrutiny,dissection and intelligent, informed comment.
Sorry, how is it nonsense? It is important as far as I'm concerned because it shows how these lunatics are put in power. Look what he has done to mental health services in this country. It is hugely important, how can you say otherwise
These lunatics of F/G//G were put in power by a Nation of fuckwits, who are ill -informed by a captured and controlled Media.who have bamboozled them with BS and irrelevancies.
For Demoracy to flourish requires an educated ,informed, politically intelligent, educated Demos, (Plato).
Ireland has a docile ,gullible naive, braindead electorate , and a corrupted Electoral Register that has not been updated for decades ,containing dead, departed , and questionalble illegal entrants that makes the integrity of any Election dubious.
You are correct ,we are governed by lunatics and the majority of the Electorate have mental health issues and cannot differentiate between sheet and shinola.
May be something in the water causing cognitive deficiency.
Agree with most of that sir
Only idiots do not recognise that Mirianna Anna Sloboda Finch is poseur shallow idiot.
😂😆😂
The brightest & best of what: the most feeble 'plants & time vampire vultures' in all state subterfuge history?
She is feeble mind for feeble minds. No wonder you are so upset.
Maybe you should read better writers with something to actually say ?
Why mention I write under a pen-name if you're not threatening to doxx me? What a weird weird thing to write, unless you're subtly implying I need to shut up talking about things you don't want me talking about.
Anyone reading this stuff really needs to question why AOL went on a trans defending PR campaign the week before people like Mary Butler were about to be appointed to ministerial office. It was out of the blue and it was weird, and there was never any rational explanation as to why people wondering about their true gender suddenly became such an issue.
You have been warned folks. Something is not right here. Shame, a lovely woman otherwise.
Mary Butler is obviously a man in women's clothing. There has never been a more obvious transgender in public life ever, since...well, since Michelle Obama.
Edit: the pen name comment is actually beyond disgusting and seriously disappointing,
This is one of the funniest piles of shite I have ever read. Who is paying or telling you to cover for these weirdo people?
I also don't think the free press article took any issue with the trans child as you implied. Mary Butler looks and acts like a man, and everything she has done to mental services is as described. Whatever it is, he's fair game. He does look like a man, and Mick Barry said what he said.
And Michelle Obama and Brid macron are almost definitely men. More likely than not, you give us no evidence to the contrary. Just 'trust me' is all you've got.
Sure Jim. You keep on believing that. Good man yerself.
Keep dodging the points.
Well said Aisling. We can all see and hear and smell a man and a woman. It's very simple.
This BS seemed to spring from an account that used some ridiculous 'facial structure mask overlay graphic' that implied that all males and females should have exactly 1 of 2 bone structures + head shapes .. which anyone with half a brain can see throughout society that bone structures+ head shapes & sizes vary considerably--whether male or female!!!!
Thank you for pointing this out Aisling, some of these conspiracies are absolutely ridiculous, and like you rightly say, give us a bad name.
I haven’t been able to trust Miri for some time now, ever since reading her post where she asserts that voting does make a difference, together with her admission of attempting to get onto the political ladder herself.
Brad passes the hand test, Angelina and Mary don't unfortunately.
The hand test is a load of bollox though.
Why so?
Women come in so many different shapes and sizes - all these tests put out on the Internet are bunkum, pseudoscience and most definitely not to be trusted. I've seen women with big feet, huge hands, snake hips, flat chests.. on it goes...still women. These investigations are quite sinister in nature and we should resist using them as proof of anything.
Hi Aisling! (Beautiful name by the way). I'm focusing dismorphism really more than body difference due to life style choices and family genetics, in other words, chromosomal, the dominance established between the X and Y chromosomes at conception. How come research seems to focus on exposure levels to hormones instead as an explanation? Don't really understand that yet. In any case I am neither a prosecuting nor defence attorney here,just looking. It may well be a load of bollocks,if so I think John should return all research monies received in the past towards the study of bollocks. Doing a great job Aisling.
John Manning is a British researcher well-known for his work on the 2D:4D ratio (the ratio of the length of the index finger to the ring finger) and its implications for sexual dimorphism and various psychological, behavioral, and health-related traits. His work has significantly contributed to the understanding of how finger length ratios might reflect prenatal hormone exposure and influence later-life characteristics.
Here are some key works by John Manning that delve into the finger proportionality differences between men and women:
1. Manning, J. T. (1995). The Finger Length Ratio: A Predictor of Sexual Orientation?
In this early paper, Manning explored the 2D:4D ratio as a potential predictor for various aspects of human development, including sexual orientation. He observed that males typically have a lower 2D:4D ratio (indicating a shorter index finger relative to the ring finger) than females, and speculated that this difference could be linked to the effects of prenatal testosterone.
2. Manning, J. T. (2002). The 2D:4D Ratio and the Prenatal Hormonal Environment.
This article provided a more detailed examination of the 2D:4D ratio, focusing on its relationship with prenatal hormone exposure, particularly the influence of testosterone and estrogen. Manning suggested that the lower the 2D:4D ratio, the higher the prenatal testosterone exposure. He found that, on average, men tend to have a lower 2D:4D ratio than women, which was interpreted as reflecting sex differences in the in-utero hormonal environment.
3. Manning, J. T., & Fink, B. (2008). Digit Ratio (2D:4D) and Testosterone Exposure and Use of Steroids in Women Athletes.
In this study, Manning and colleagues expanded on the connection between the 2D:4D ratio and athletic performance, particularly among female athletes. They found that women with a lower 2D:4D ratio (associated with higher prenatal testosterone) were more likely to use anabolic steroids, further linking the finger length ratio to hormonal influences and behaviors related to testosterone.
4. Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Wilson, J., & Lewis-Jones, D. I. (1998). The Ratio of 2nd to 4th Digit Length: A Predictor of Spermatogenic Impairment in Men.
This work by Manning and colleagues investigated the relationship between the 2D:4D ratio and male fertility. They found that a lower 2D:4D ratio (again, indicating higher prenatal testosterone exposure) was associated with better sperm quality and fertility, offering a biological explanation for why this ratio might be relevant in understanding male reproductive health.
5. Manning, J. T. (2008). Digit Ratio: A Pointer to Fertility, Behavior, and Health.
In this book, Manning synthesized much of his earlier research and provided an in-depth exploration of the 2D:4D ratio. He discussed how this ratio could be a reliable marker of prenatal testosterone exposure and linked it to various traits like sexual behavior, aggression, athletic ability, and even susceptibility to certain health conditions. The book presented compelling evidence that finger length differences between men and women are not merely cosmetic but may reflect deeper biological and behavioral patterns.
John Manning's research has shown that the 2D:4D ratio can be an insightful tool for understanding the physiological and behavioral differences between men and women, suggesting that the relative length of these fingers is influenced by hormonal factors during fetal development. While his studies have been groundbreaking, they also sparked debate and further research on the implications and reliability of the 2D:4D ratio in various fields.
You say you don't need a DNA test to know a male from a female,your eyes will confirm. Fair enough, confirm to image attached then.
https://www.google.com/search?q=elle+bradford+&sca_esv=02ffffb80f2add66&udm=2&biw=384&bih=677&sxsrf=AHTn8zqYKpqmO7FRoE-wrZbJ2lcB2OUxSg%3A1738144292026&ei=JPqZZ7ulAeXEwPAP4ZT1YA&oq=elle+bradford+&gs_lp=EhJtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1pbWciDmVsbGUgYnJhZGZvcmQgMgQQIxgnMgQQABgeMgQQABgeMgYQABgKGB4yBBAAGB5IiiZQtQlY7xdwAHgAkAEAmAH4AaABtguqAQYxLjEwLjG4AQPIAQD4AQGYAgmgAqMIwgIIEAAYgAQYogSYAwCIBgGSBwMxLjigB6Mc&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-img#vhid=QalFSWpj5xyInM&vssid=mosaic